Welcome to the Utopia Forums! Register a new account
The current time is Thu Sep 18 23:41:38 UTC 2025
Utopia Talk / Politics / Eu bans strike anywhere matches
Sam Adams
rank | Sun Aug 12 23:30:27 2018 Lol@seb http://www...-ban-chemicals-Brussels-Brexit |
Seb
rank | Mon Aug 13 01:05:40 2018 Lol@Sam. Do you think that the EU has actually banned strike anywhere matches? The reality is in the first couple of paragraphs. |
Seb
rank | Mon Aug 13 01:13:09 2018 It appears that a particular phosphorus compound has been banned because of that compounds properties. Which means that products using it - of which this one brand of matches is one such product - have either had to substitute an alternative compound or discontinue the product. This is like describing banning asbestos as banning fire retardant panels. Sam falls for tabloid shit like this every time because he's an idiot. |
obaminated
rank | Mon Aug 13 01:17:20 2018 lol, seb, you moron. the point is the EU is dictating what can be done in the UK. Your complete lack of independent spirit and astoundingly sad. |
Paramount
rank | Mon Aug 13 08:27:14 2018 You mean like how the feds can dictate on what can be done in certain states in the US? |
Seb
rank | Mon Aug 13 09:03:47 2018 Obaminated: Yes. The EU, with its British MEPs, it's British commissioner, it's British representation on the council, it's British judges etc. is empowered to regulate various things in the UK thanks to British legislation giving it power to do so. This arrangement being due to the single market policy - which is a little like your interstate commerce rule - a policy dreamed up by Thatcher's government and pushed through by the UK precisely because removing the basis for non tarrifs barriers is essential for reducing trade friction and achieving a level of economic efficiency beyond simple "free trade agreement" as it removes the need for customs and customs checks. When we achieve the supposed nirvanah of leaving the EU, any match manufacturer will enjoy the bounteous and righteous freedom to choose to use carcinogens banned in the EU to manufacture matches, though in practice they will conform to EU standards so they can sell matches there, it being a bigger market than the UK, only then they will also be subject to checks at the border, increasing their relative cost and losing market share. All without British MEPs, British Commissioners, and the British govt on the council to represent our interests. Truly, we will be restored to our full theoretical sovereignty to do exactly whatever the EU (or US) determines in product, financial and other standards or not participate. Sovereignty = choice between options. Power = setting those options. Leaving the EU is an exercise in trading real power for the formal trappings of sovereignty. |
Seb
rank | Mon Aug 13 09:05:02 2018 It's quite likely the British govt in some way supported the ban on this chemical; it's unlikely wed ever reinstate it if we left. |
Nimatzo
rank | Mon Aug 13 09:05:59 2018 ^lol pwned your rugged individualistic asses. You know atleast the Brits voted for the EU at some point. Did you all vote for the federal government deciding what carcinogens you can’t have in your foods? |
Nimatzo
rank | Mon Aug 13 09:06:45 2018 That was in response to Paramount. |
Nimatzo
rank | Mon Aug 13 09:07:16 2018 But it made sense either way :) |
show deleted posts |