Welcome to the Utopia Forums! Register a new account
The current time is Fri Dec 15 19:41:27 PST 2017

Utopia Talk / Politics / Worst global warming model most accurate
Nimatzo
iChihuaha
Wed Dec 06 12:20:45
Meanwhile in science.

http://phy...re-severe-climate-accurate.amp

The climate models that project greater amounts of warming this century are the ones that best align with observations of the current climate, according to a new paper from Carnegie's Patrick Brown and Ken Caldeira published by Nature. Their findings suggest that the models used by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, on average, may be underestimating future warming.
jergul
large member
Wed Dec 06 12:37:35
I am not surprised. There are a lot conditional sinks that have to work and they are pretty conditional.

But modelling is always a work in progress (at least for valid models). So accuracy is a moving target.

Hurricane frequency models are also under review incidentally.

http://www...arm_hurr/Obs_vs_zetac_hurr.png

But you always have dotards grasping at their dotage.
Dukhat
Member
Wed Dec 06 14:09:49
If you go to conservative websites, you'd think the opposite and it's full of non-college educated whites screaming about how it's entirely a conspiracy.

The stupidity of the white working class in America is going to help destroy this planet.
Dukhat
Member
Wed Dec 06 14:10:12
Actually you don't have to go there. Just look at Sam who supposedly has a college education. Group of fucking retards.
Sam Adams
Member
Wed Dec 06 14:21:06
Lol. The world is warming a little and the lemmings lose their fucking minds. Cuckhat and jergul trying to comprehend science. Lol.

This reminds me of the chicks with mental breakdowns crying as your airliner flies through light turbulence. Hilariously pathetic.
jergul
large member
Wed Dec 06 14:32:28
Sammy
The problem is you not understanding science.

Any risk analysis will tell you that global warming is not a good idea. Or in socio-economic terms: the costs are not worth benefits.

Your underlying principle beyond obfustication is externalizing costs. It does not cost you anything you can see, and global warming otherwise provides you with benefits (amongst them employment. The more climate, the more you can predict crap or whatever the hell it is you do).

My main issue with global warming is you basically. It is rotting your mind.
Sam Adams
Member
Wed Dec 06 14:45:44
Lol jergul please explain how the oceans are warming by 60w/m2 again. That was funny. Or how you cant use hyrdostatics on gasses because gasses arent fluids. Lulz.
jergul
large member
Wed Dec 06 14:53:20
Sammy
Lulz. I forgot misrepresentation.

Of your 80w/m2, 60w/m2 comes from the oceans. You know. Where hurricanes get their energy.

Gases are fluids. My issue was your trying to use hydrostatics to describe dynamic processes (what equilibrium are you predicting sammy?).

Meanwhile, you were off 3 orders of magnitude in your 4th order rantings. That is serious sammy. And it took Seb several threads to make you realize your huge error.

Obfustication makes you a tool.
Sam Adams
Member
Wed Dec 06 15:19:18
Once every so often jergul says something correct and i feel bad for being a dick.

Of course, now is not one of those times.
Dukhat
Member
Wed Dec 06 15:28:50
Sam digs his own hole. Nobody believes him except the alt-right peanut gallery and they didn't even bother to read what he said anyways; they just want to "get at them liberals."
Sam Adams
Member
Wed Dec 06 16:03:45
The belief of idiots is irrelevent.
McKobb
Member
Wed Dec 06 16:34:39
Unless you are religious
Sam Adams
Member
Wed Dec 06 19:44:51
Or a politician
show deleted posts

Your Name:
Your Password:
Your Message:
Bookmark and Share