Welcome to the Utopia Forums! Register a new account
The current time is Fri Mar 29 10:47:55 2024

Utopia Talk / Politics / Trumpicantards gonna Trump
FoxNEWS
Member
Thu Jan 18 17:08:28
Fisherman who jumped into river to avoid oncoming motorboat sues helmsman

Larsen told The Oregonian the accusation against him was “fake news.” He pleaded not guilty to the charges and said the lawsuit was unnecessary because no one was seriously hurt. His son-in-law, who was also on the boat at the time of the accident, told investigators he warned Larsen to pay attention and that he’d been using his cellphone off and on all morning.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=agWmkZYu31Q


Trumpicantards rejoice as they continue to drop the American IQ.
Cold Rod
Member
Thu Jan 18 17:13:52
Wow! And totally something hot rod would have done and said.
Hot Rod
Revved Up
Thu Jan 18 18:25:32

Not likely shit face.

The water was cold and the boat was scratched beyond repair. Plus they lost a good day of fishing and they possibly shit their pants.

There are rules for boating just as there are for driving on the highway. You can bet Larsen is guilty of something that could warrant a civil suit.

Cold Rod
Member
Thu Jan 18 18:59:56
Yes likely shit face.
Hot Rod
Revved Up
Thu Jan 18 21:17:58

I bet my shit face is much better looking than that ugly shit face of yours, foreigner.

Cold Rod
Member
Fri Jan 19 10:30:23
Lol hot rod so mad.
Paramount
Member
Fri Jan 19 11:59:40
Who cares if they lost a good day of fishing. Shit happens. It’s not a fking human right to fish.
Hot Rod
Revved Up
Fri Jan 19 17:16:35

It is a "fking human right" to not get run over by a careless slob in a motor boat.

delude
Member
Fri Jan 19 17:41:56
"Not likely shit face. "

Yes likely. Undeniable facts of actions that took place supported by evidence. And you would call it "fake news."

You're welcome.
Hot Rod
Revved Up
Fri Jan 19 17:56:29

HUH?

delude
Member
Fri Jan 19 18:07:07
I am agreeing with CR that this would be something that you would do. I know words confuse you, but try slowly comprehending the sentiment.
Hot Rod
Revved Up
Fri Jan 19 18:09:54

ERR...

Are you sure that you are in the right thread?

Hot Rod
Revved Up
Fri Jan 19 18:12:54

You could not possibly be in the right thread because cr is fill of shit.


Go look at the video and then yell me the idiot in the motor boat is correct.

delude
Member
Sat Jan 20 02:19:48
Yeah, you're pretty dumb. Let's try this again and do it step by step.

CR: "And totally something hot rod would have done and said. "

What could CR possibly be referring? Perhaps the video and the comment attached that came from an article by fox news it appears.

::Larsen told The Oregonian the accusation against him was “fake news.” He pleaded not guilty to the charges and said the lawsuit was unnecessary because no one was seriously hurt. His son-in-law, who was also on the boat at the time of the accident, told investigators he warned Larsen to pay attention and that he’d been using his cellphone off and on all morning.::

Now from deductive reasoning I can presume he [CR] meant this --

a) The person that crashed the boat into the fisherman is denying he crashed his boat into the others due to being distracted and not paying attention.

and

b) By calling it "fake news" as Larsen did - you know the one that piloted the boat. Is in the situation of being shown at fault with the attachments of witnesses or witness and video.

To which goes with CR's sentiment and my agreement with it:

"Yes likely. Undeniable facts of actions that took place supported by evidence. And you would call it "fake news."



By because you have an historically abysmal record of poor comprehension and a track record when it comes to evidence and facts. You would be like Larsen and call it "fake news" despite of.
delude
Member
Sat Jan 20 02:21:33
Why?* Because...*
Hot Rod
Revved Up
Sat Jan 20 07:48:27

Except for one minor little detail.

I think Larsen should be hung out to dry.

Idiots.

Delude
Member
Sat Jan 20 07:59:02
Yes. That is all well and good for you to say. But the sentiment still remains. That minor little detail you tend to look over as fail to comprehend.
Hot Rod
Revved Up
Sat Jan 20 17:35:47

You are the one that fails in that area.

Delude
Member
Sat Jan 20 18:31:03
No. You have demonstrated your failure here and many other threads.
Hot Rod
Revved Up
Sat Jan 20 18:39:37

As do you.



Delude
Member
Sat Jan 20 21:00:22
Point it out...
Hot Rod
Revved Up
Sat Jan 20 21:34:44

This thread.

Delude
Member
Sun Jan 21 05:17:04
The same thread that perfectly points out that when faced with facts ad evidence you refuse to accept and would call it 'fake news that you are currently undertaking in other threads?

Denial must be a wonderful thing for you.
Hot Rod
Revved Up
Sun Jan 21 06:49:56

So, you think it is just fine and dandy to get a huge motor boat and run over smaller boats.

What happens if you kill or maim some people along the way?

Is that OK too?

Personally I do not think so.

delude
Member
Sun Jan 21 06:51:52
No where did I say that. See, you're stupid.
Hot Rod
Revved Up
Sun Jan 21 07:06:36

You claimed that his defense is the same one I would use.

Obviously I would not.

So I can only assume that you think Larsen was in the right.

delude
Member
Sun Jan 21 07:09:19
Your logical argument fails on so many levels.

The premise is that you would take similar actions when faced with facts, evidence, and proof. You would call it 'fake news' as an attempt to discount and deny the truth because you are incorrigible or don't like the situation.

"Obviously I would not. "

You have a history of it...
Hot Rod
Revved Up
Sun Jan 21 07:21:33

Give me some facts.

how have I called truth, fake news.

Five should be enough to convince me. Don't count this one because you have it wrong.

delude
Member
Sun Jan 21 07:25:43
Take a look at the current threads now. More specifically apple thread.
delude
Member
Sun Jan 21 07:29:20
Take a look at the quotes presented by various other posters of you with links attached showing that you said it. Only then for you to discount it because as said "incorrigible or don't like the situation.'

There is too many years of such documentation that you would have to make a formal request for the archivist to take the time out of his day to pull up such information that corroborates with your actions of caring not about facts and ignore them.

You even have a mockery of your actions talking about your mental status and a step by step instruction on how to 'debate' hot rod. Which was hilarious.

You have a history of this throughout the years. And you want to say that you never done this?

Hot Rod
Revved Up
Sun Jan 21 07:34:30

I merely stated that APPLE broke no laws.

Do you have ***PROOF*** that they were breaking a law by keeping the money overseas?


We are interested in facts, Right?


Right?

delude
Member
Sun Jan 21 07:35:09
Do you even read your own threads and the discussion that has been occurring?
Hot Rod
Revved Up
Sun Jan 21 07:55:14

I asked a simple question. One that even a simpleton like you should be able to answer.


"Do you have ***PROOF*** that they were breaking a law by keeping the money overseas?"


Waiting...

delude
Member
Sun Jan 21 08:02:08
"I asked a simple question. One that even a simpleton like you should be able to answer.


"Do you have ***PROOF*** that they were breaking a law by keeping the money overseas?"


Waiting... "

Read your apple thread, rod.
Hot Rod
Revved Up
Sun Jan 21 08:09:30

You have zero proof because I am right and you are wrong.

-30-

delude
Member
Sun Jan 21 08:17:52
Every proof of me saying that you hate and ignore facts is tainted in just about every thread your are participating in.

See the ones you are fleeing from as you prove my points.

Good job.
show deleted posts

Your Name:
Your Password:
Your Message:
Bookmark and Share