Utopia Talk / Politics / YouTube under attack

tumbleweed the wanderer	Tue Apr 03 15:32:14 active shooter at YouTube hopefully someone puts it on YouTube
Allahuakbar Member	Tue Apr 03 15:43:34 Should not have deleted so many IS videos.
Paramount Member	Tue Apr 03 15:49:56 Youtube shut down some extreme right winged channels recently, didn’t they?
Paramount Member	Tue Apr 03 15:56:33 Oh well, its just another day in America. Another gun nut with hurt feelings, most likely.
Sam Adams Member	Tue Apr 03 15:57:49 This is a really hard guess the race. Muslim? Angry former employee or ex? Redneck pissed off at youtubes politics?
hood Member	Tue Apr 03 15:58:51 This won't be an YouTube. But I'm sure LiveLeak will have a video
Im better then you 2012 UP Football Champ	Tue Apr 03 16:17:02 FEMALE SUSPECT?!?!? thats new
Average Ameriacn Member	Tue Apr 03 16:20:39 Can't find live streams on YT!?!?
Rugian Member	Tue Apr 03 16:31:31 Given YouTubes policies as of late, this is just basically a cleansing.
delude Member	Tue Apr 03 16:35:18 love triangle shooting.
tumbleweed the wanderer	Tue Apr 03 16:44:48 seems like confirmed as female shooter 4 victims sent to hospital, only shooter confirmed dead
tumbleweed the wanderer	Tue Apr 03 16:48:17 so seems score is now 94 to 3 (according to the first website i found on mass shooters by gender)
Paramount Member	Tue Apr 03 16:49:06 Maybe she was a militant lesbian and vegan?
tumbleweed the wanderer	Tue Apr 03 16:53:53 perhaps... maybe check her home for an unfinished woodworking project
Sam Adams Member	Tue Apr 03 16:57:51 "FEMALE SUSPECT?!?!? thats new" Ya. Big ol curveball on that one.
Forwyn Member	Tue Apr 03 17:05:17 Totally triggered by the Damore sympathizers.
Cthulhu Tentacle Rapist	Tue Apr 03 17:28:18 FEMALE SUSPECT?!?!? thats new' SJW that's irate that any opinion she doesn't agree with is allowed to be on youtube. Probably middle class caucasian
Average Ameriacn Member	Tue Apr 03 17:36:20 Probably black transgender lesbian.
Cthulhu Tentacle Rapist	Tue Apr 03 17:47:43 One that was born a white male though, right?
Sam Adams Member	Tue Apr 03 18:15:57 Sounds like a typical "im gonna shoot my ex and kill myself" thing. Not sure why people wanna kill the person they just loved, but hey, the world is full of retards.
State Department Member	Tue Apr 03 19:59:43 #neveragain
Aeros Member	Tue Apr 03 22:38:40 Suspect was Nasim Aghdam A Female, vegan, turkish muslim, who was buttmad over youtube demonitizing her shitty dance videos. .... That's it. I believe that somehow we managed to fork reality and we are all living in a reality dominated by a chaos god.
Aeros Member	Tue Apr 03 22:51:42 Correction, apparently an Iranian jew maybe. Just wow.
tumbleweed the wanderer	Tue Apr 03 23:03:10 33% of female mass shooters are vegan, bodybuilder, persian, muslim, disgruntled YouTube users
Sam Adams Member	Tue Apr 03 23:25:48 So we have a crazed iranian peta member and fringe liberal conspiracy theorist who ranted on youtube and also had a youtuber employee ex? Hmmm... im confused at what to laugh at first.
Sam Adams Member	Tue Apr 03 23:28:18 Oh ya i missed the female body builder parts. Interesting combo.
Y2A Member	Tue Apr 03 23:44:29 Total nutjob http://youtu.be/fYA1S0tF1vI
Y2A Member	Tue Apr 03 23:45:15 Iranian but is clearly mentally deranged, not Islamic terrorism
Stalker Member	Tue Apr 03 23:59:02 http://www.nasimesabz.com/ BE AWARE! Dictatorship exists in all countries but with different tactics! They only care for personal short term profits & do anything to reach their goals even by fooling simple-minded people, hiding the truth, manipulating science & everything, putting public mental & physical health at risk, abusing non-human animals, polluting environment, destroying family values, promoting materialism & sexual degeneration in the name of freedom,..... & turning people into programmed robots! "Make the lie big, Make it simple, Keep saying it, And eventually they will believe it" Adolf Hitler... There is no free speech in real world & you will be suppressed for telling the truth that is not supported by the system. Videos of targeted users are filtered & merely relegated, so that people can hardly see their videos! .There is no equal growth opportunity on YOUTUBE or any other video sharing site, your channel will grow if they want to!!!!!
Stalker Member	Wed Apr 04 00:02:16 Her other video account is still up for now: http://www.dailymotion.com/yesilnasim
Y2A Member	Wed Apr 04 00:04:21 13 followers
Sam Adams Member	Wed Apr 04 00:06:10 Yup. Total psycho. We probably shouldnt let psychos own guns. Just saying.
smart dude Member	Wed Apr 04 07:04:11 Seb will blame YouTube
Paramount Member	Wed Apr 04 11:14:01 Looks like it was someone who took vlogging very seriously. Maybe other vloggers will get inpired by her. I hope the NSA and FBI will keep track on all of them.
hood Member	Wed Apr 04 11:19:34 She's definitely a rugian/forwyn type, considering her rants about Google/YouTube censorship.
Paramount Member	Wed Apr 04 11:21:33 ...or a ”life is not fair” type :)
Forwyn Member	Wed Apr 04 13:39:42 There's hood with our daily dose of retardation. "Muh content providers can't censor on a massive scale, only ISPs can do that! hurrr you once made an offhand comment about censorship too hurrr"
Dukhat Member	Wed Apr 04 14:09:04 Forwyn reveals once again he has no idea what Net Neutrality is. Total fucktard all around.
hood Member	Wed Apr 04 14:16:07 Completely unrelated, tardwyn. But nice try.
Forwyn Member	Wed Apr 04 14:17:30 Unrelated to what, fuck face? You sad attempts at random trolling? No need to relate directly to your retarded shit.
Rugian Member	Wed Apr 04 14:19:04 I could have sworn I once read somewhere that one of the benefits of net neutrality is that it would prevsnt ISPs from censoring the internet at will. ----- "Making sure all surfers on the Web enjoy the same speed no matter which website they visit is a fundamental free speech issue, Sen. Al Franken (D-Minn.) said on Tuesday. “It is absolutely the First Amendment issue of our time,” Franken said at a Capitol Hill forum sponsored by the advocacy group Free Press. “Do we want deep-pocketed corporations controlling what information you get at what speed?” he added." http://the...st-amendment-issue-of-our-time Never change, Dukhat. As for Hoods ridiculous claim that I would have some sort of connection with this woman...she was 39. I believe Ser Meryn had a saying about people that age.
hood Member	Wed Apr 04 14:33:54 Calling her a rugian type implies connection?
tumbleweed the wanderer	Wed Apr 04 14:45:37 here's a rant by her http://www.liveleak.com/view?t=si7s4_1522814052 all people w/ video rants should be rounded up for questioning
Forwyn Member	Wed Apr 04 15:06:01 http://imgur.com/gallery/n8umjWj
hood Member	Wed Apr 04 15:10:12 Tardwyn, I'm not sure you understand what's going on here. Yes, you are a being a retard. Are you suggesting that it's for the lols? Ok, I guess. Not really all that funny. My comment is based on fact. This dead lady shares common ground with both you and rugian by way of rants about social media censorship (in her case, YouTube). It is fact that both you and rugian have made similar comments. We could go find the exact posts of you want. Methinks you need to pull an Aghdam here and get yourself dead.
McKobb Member	Wed Apr 04 15:13:40 Vegan's got a gun! The whole world's come undone
Forwyn Member	Wed Apr 04 15:17:24 I'm gonna go out on a limb here and say that you can probably find someone else that aligns a little closer to vegan bodybuilder Bahai leftist. But sure, you do you. "Censorship is bad, even if it's not IPs" is a niche political position, I know. Retard.
Rugian Member	Wed Apr 04 15:17:58 Hood, You characterized our benevolent enlightening of UP on the important subject of content hosters and internet censorship as "rants." How did you think Forwyn would take it?
hood Member	Wed Apr 04 15:34:00 "How did you think Forwyn would take it?" Oh, I fully expected him to take it exactly like the whiny bitch he is. I'm not at all surprised by either his reaction or yours. "you can probably find someone else that aligns a little closer to vegan bodybuilder Bahai leftist." I wouldn't disagree. But it seems the important factor here was the crazy ranting about perceived censorship. I don't think she went off to YouTube headquarters with a gun because she's a vegan. "But sure, you do you. "Censorship is bad, even if it's not IPs" is a niche political position, I know." Nowhere did I imply what you're ascribing to me. You should try facts.
hood Member	Wed Apr 04 15:35:29 Rugian, Just googled the Meryn reference. Was. Not. Expecting. That.
Dukhat Member	Wed Apr 04 15:40:50 Hood owned Forskin so hard he had to retreat into his alt-right safe space and respond with a meme. Retarded to the extreme.
Hrothgar Member	Wed Apr 04 15:55:00 With all of the social media data collected on everyone in this nation, it's would be completely feasible to add info on social media posts to a background check. ... of course that would mean none of us here could ever buy a firearm because we've all had our moments of posting bat shit insane stuff over the years.
delude Member	Wed Apr 04 16:02:17 Anyone else find it ironic out of the many threads and posts that forwyn and rugian have posted in regards to censorship and the first amendment. A person who is quite similar in thoughts has expressed the rhetoric and then went to the extreme, now they vehemently want to distant themselves from them denying they have no similarities at all.
Forwyn Member	Wed Apr 04 16:48:17 "I fully expected him to take it exactly like the whiny bitch he is." So you're trolling like a retard, as I said initially. I will note your acknowledgement. "But it seems the important factor here was the crazy ranting about perceived censorship." You're ignoring the personal factor. She wanted to be a social media star, and perceived demonetization as a direct attack. General statements about content provider censorship being troubling isn't really comparable, if you aren't a retard. "Nowhere did I imply what you're ascribing to me." What are you doing in this thread? rofl
Forwyn Member	Wed Apr 04 16:49:20 Also rofl at Cuckhat and delude, "hurrrr remarking on corporate censorship means you need to distance yourself from a shooter who was demonetized, hurrrr owned, hurrrr" retards, top kek
Forwyn Member	Wed Apr 04 16:50:43 "I heard James Damore likes cheerios, ironic that cheerios-eaters vehemently want to distance themselves" kek
hood Member	Wed Apr 04 17:06:39 "So you're trolling like a retard, as I said initially." No. Trolling is posting to elicit a reaction. Recognizing what reaction you will elicit and specifically attempting to elicit that reaction are separate things. I made an observation for the sake of the observation. I knew that your bloody period would get smeared all over the thread. I also knew rugian would take it in stride and respond in kind. I still stand by the accuracy of my statements. "General statements about content provider censorship being troubling isn't really comparable, if you aren't a retard." General statements, sure, right. Is that why you divert topics to social media censorship? Because it's just a general statement? Is that why you blindly oppose NN? Because you generally observe that non-isp companies also censor? "What are you doing in this thread? rofl" Someone's trolling here and it isn't me. You've agreed with my statement of fact: that both you and the ninja warrior (and rugian) have taken specific umbrage to the recent trend that social media has been censoring their users. Whereas I have not suggested that it is highly uncommon for people to be against censorship of all kinds. If you weren't amazingly retarded, you would have recognized that I too take issue with companies like Facebook/Google/Twitter censoring people. I simply recognize the legal problems with attempting to legislate some sort of compliance and ridicule stupid fucks like you who attempt to relate social media censorship to internet access. But surely, the next time this topic comes up you will just continue to misconstrue my position as being compliant with social media censorship (because your IQ rivals that of a vegetable).
Forwyn Member	Wed Apr 04 17:16:28 "I made an observation for the sake of the observation" i.e. you're a fucking retard, and a piece of shit retard at that. "Methinks you need to pull an Aghdam here and get yourself dead." - sake of observation "Is that why you divert topics to social media censorship?" lie. In the thread provided, you will see I enter a conversation already diverted. "Is that why you blindly oppose NN?" Also a lie. I have remarked that NN wouldn't be necessary if not for government-enabled monopolies. Overall, I have remained rather neutral on the issue beyond noting that it is hypocritical to play Chicken Little regarding ISPs and completely ignore content providers. "If you weren't amazingly retarded, you would have recognized that I too take issue with companies like Facebook/Google/Twitter censoring people. I simply recognize the legal problems with attempting to legislate some sort of compliance and ridicule stupid fucks like you who attempt to relate social media censorship to internet access." Actually, you haven't brought up that issue at all. What you discuss here is "reach", because you pretend that social media entities don't have enormous reach and influence. http://www...hread=82169&time=1520540576787 "misconstrue my position" I'm terribly sorry if I misconstrued your position while you compared me to a mass shooter "as an observation", fucking mongoloid.
hood Member	Wed Apr 04 17:34:33 ""Methinks you need to pull an Aghdam here and get yourself dead." - sake of observation" A post made in response to you calling me a troll. So fucking retarded. "i.e. you're a fucking retard, and a piece of shit retard at that." For noting that people share opinions? I think you need to build up a little personal armor, lest you remind people of floppy, whining vaginas. "Also a lie. I have remarked that NN wouldn't be necessary if not for government-enabled monopolies." An inaccurate and retarded statement on its own. "Overall, I have remained rather neutral on the issue beyond noting that it is hypocritical to play Chicken Little regarding ISPs and completely ignore content providers." Then you do not understand what net neutrality is. To make this comparison is to further the false comparison of those who oppose NN. Perhaps you are ignorantly retarded. If so, I will apologize for ascribing malice to what was simple stupidity. It is not exactly the best argument to make, however, considering the meme you posted about retards. "Actually, you haven't brought up that issue at all. What you discuss here is "reach"" ... You realize that there exists more than 1 thread on NN, right? Try again, ignorant tard. "you pretend that social media entities don't have enormous reach and influence." Everything is relative. If you cannot understand the basic concept that your ISP can quite literally cut you off of the entire internet, compared to twitter only blocking you on twitter, I cannot help you. Recognizing this and pointing it out doesn't pretend that social media entities don't have reach. "I'm terribly sorry if I misconstrued your position while you compared me to a mass shooter "as an observation", fucking mongoloid." I can't say that I'm not amused by how fucking mad you are over this, because it is quite hilarious, unintentional as it may be. However, you should see above about having some fucking balls (I previously referred to it as building armor). Yeah, I compared you to this woman. She happens to have shot up a business. Welcome to fucking UP. You could always pull a hot rod and fake your death if your delicate emotions can't handle the odd unflattering comparison.
hood Member	Wed Apr 04 17:48:46 Also, a hardy bit of amusement, directly from forwyn's link: hood Thu Mar 08 14:22:56 ... Don't mistake my point though: I agree with you on the whole free speech thing. I find it excessively stupid that people get banned from social media for being offensive or "wrong." I find it dangerous that a little public backlash could get one fired from their job. I also recognize the difficulty in creating a law that is actually legal to correct the idiocy. We can't force Twitter to allow you to use its service.
Rugian Member	Wed Apr 04 17:59:31 "delude Member Wed Apr 04 16:02:17 Anyone else find it ironic out of the many threads and posts that forwyn and rugian have posted in regards to censorship and the first amendment. A person who is quite similar in thoughts has expressed the rhetoric and then went to the extreme, now they vehemently want to distant themselves from them denying they have no similarities at all." Holy shit dude, false equivalency much? Also, I haven't actually made an effort to distance myself at all. The sum total of my comments in this thread so far have been to (a) express support to whoever was cleansing Youtube, (b) make fun of Dukhat' s stupidity, (c) make a pedophile joke and (d) make a self-congratulatory post extolling my noble efforts to educate you savages. Well, and now this post defending myself against your usual cretiny.
Forwyn Member	Wed Apr 04 18:12:35 "A post made in response to you calling me a troll. So fucking retarded." You trolled, got called out on it, and acted like a troll in response. Just admit you're a retarded troll. It's fine, this an anonymous message board, basically built for trolls who have outgrown 4chan. Don't worry, you're not totally lumped in with Cuckhat. Even though you're a retarded troll, you occasionally post something of merit. "For noting that people share opinions?" Are you asking if people should stop responding to you? That's fine, too. "An inaccurate and retarded statement on its own." Coming from a retarded troll who lies to make his point, not overly concerned there. "Then you do not understand what net neutrality is." We disagree about what scope merits response. Hardly ignorance there. "You realize that there exists more than 1 thread on NN, right?" Feel free to post one. I try not to post outright lies, even when trolling, unlike you. So if you'll provide it, I'll gladly admit my error. "If you cannot understand the basic concept that your ISP can quite literally cut you off of the entire internet, compared to twitter only blocking you on twitter" The former would face a great deal more backlash than the latter gets. Twitter is an extreme in any case. Google listing practices are far more analogous where scope is concerned. "umad" You're trying awfully hard to spin as "muh soppy vagina, umad?" when I'm just calling you out as a retard. You comparison was bad, your bait was bad. Me responding doesn't make me mad, that's what we do here. Sorry that you're butthurt about being a retard, but telling me to off myself doesn't change that. At the end of the day, you're still a retard.
Forwyn Member	Wed Apr 04 18:17:08 To reiterate delude's idiocy, which is on par with Cuckhat's, adjustment of monetization policy is not censorship.
Delude Member	Wed Apr 04 19:39:54 Awww the two blubbering vaginas are upset.
Delude Member	Wed Apr 04 19:42:36 Rugian, let us not forget the thread of dedication you've made in order to stifle posters because they annoyed you. Let us not forget the many different posts and multiple threads of you whining about censorship "on the line." It is ironic that you have someone who bitched about the same thing decided to shoot up the place.
hood Member	Wed Apr 04 20:05:25 Tardwyn exemplifies the notion that stupid people generally gravitate to warmer climates.
Hot Rod Revved Up	Wed Apr 04 21:01:40 Moving to a warmer climate is intelligent. Remaining in the cold and suffering is what is stupid.
Dukhat Member	Wed Apr 04 22:45:27 Forwyn's really grasping for straws. One of the most forthright and obvious examples of cognitive dissonance ever on this board. KABOOM.
Forwyn Member	Wed Apr 04 22:59:15 I'd really rather not have to go in for sloppy seconds on your wife, obaminated tends to leave it pretty messy.
Dukhat Member	Wed Apr 04 23:07:00 So angry. Kaboom!
Forwyn Member	Wed Apr 04 23:54:37 Hood, Delude, and Cuckhat - the unholy trinity of "umad" fags kek
Average Ameriacn Member	Thu Apr 05 02:44:11 Clinton was President at that time: http://www...sim-aghdam-20180404-story.html Aghdam entered the country as a refugee roughly two decades ago, a family member said.
Cherub Cow Member	Thu Apr 05 05:36:54 ..so it was U.S./Western culture that made her violent! We of the West can only blame ourselves for indoctrinating these people with our poor values. Before the West, there were rivers made of chocolate where children like Aghdam laughed and played with gumdrop smiles!
Paramount Member	Thu Apr 05 05:50:31 Perhaps there wasn’t any rivers of chocolate, but there certainly was no children being murdered by guns on that continent before the white man came. The white man brought slavery, mass shootings, and racism.
Hot Rod Revved Up	Thu Apr 05 09:09:12 I read a book one time where the Indians would attack the settlers homes. They would take the babies and smash them up against the wall of the cabin.
Dukhat Member	Thu Apr 05 10:11:40 Get caught making retarded stupid comment because you read trash alt-right sources. Check. Get angry when logical fallacy pointed out. Check. Proceed to double down and argue irrelevant minutae. Check. Proceed to go into rage with memes and personal attacks. Check. Scream some more and make more memes and personal attacks. Check. Repeat constant personal attacks while seeking comfort and assurance from other mentally disabled alt-right members for all eternity. Check. ***************** Forwyn cucked himself so good.
Cherub Cow Member	Fri Apr 06 19:13:58 "Perhaps there wasn’t any rivers of chocolate, but there certainly was no children being murdered by guns on that continent before the white man came. The white man brought slavery, mass shootings, and racism." lol — I love the myth of the "noble savage" :D
Sam Adams Member	Fri Apr 06 19:46:00 "The white man brought slavery, mass shootings, and racism." That might be the single dumbest thing ever posted on up.
	show deleted posts

Your Name:
Your Password:
Your Message: