Utopia Talk / Politics / rapist Kavanaugh vs lying whores

tumbleweed the wanderer	Sun Sep 23 21:57:27 the hearing is Thursday (supposedly): D senator: "Mr. Kavanaugh, did you put your dick in some drunk girl's face at a Yale party?" Kavanaugh: "You're goddamn right I did!" (^a 2nd weaker allegation has emerged) ...at least now the Supreme Court justices know what to do at his initiation party
tumbleweed the wanderer	Sun Sep 23 22:11:37 Michael Avenatti (or 'Creepy Porn Lawyer' to those who watch the joke News channels) has also posted this letter he sent to the committee about Kavanaugh at gang-rape parties: http://pbs.twimg.com/media/Dn0mJm8WsAAX2kI.jpg & tweeted: " Brett Kavanaugh must also be asked about this entry in his yearbook: "FFFFFFFourth of July." We believe that this stands for: Find them, French them, Feel them, Finger them, F*ck them, Forget them. As well as the term "Devil's Triangle." Perhaps Sen. Grassley can ask him. " now we've got ourselves a show worthy of Trump
obaminated Member	Sun Sep 23 22:21:48 yeah, it is almost as though the left is organized in their efforts to slander a man's reputation and career sans any evidence, all because they really don't want trump to succeed.
tumbleweed the wanderer	Sun Sep 23 22:30:30 were you a Roy Moore fan too?
tumbleweed the wanderer	Sun Sep 23 22:35:07 and presumably you think Trump is being honest when he says ALL of the women who accuse him of sexual assault & harassment are liars (despite admitting to the behavior)... while also accepting w/ no issue that he lied about cheating on his wife
hood Member	Sun Sep 23 22:54:36 "were you a Roy Moore fan too?" He was, yes.
tumbleweed the wanderer	Sun Sep 23 22:56:44 if Kavanaugh has balls he'll say 'yeah, we got girls drunk to have sex w/ them, as was the style at the time' (& still) recall the Seinfeld where Jerry gets the girl to pass out to play with her toys... what do people think the joke was there? this was the way things were done :p
obaminated Member	Sun Sep 23 23:09:21 ah jeez, he drank booze when he was a teen and became horny. Oh the infamy!
tumbleweed the wanderer	Sun Sep 23 23:34:35 right, he should own it there's compelling evidence he was an alcohol-guzzling douchebag
Forwyn Member	Sun Sep 23 23:41:50 Is being a frat boy a disqualifying factor now?
Im better then you 2012 UP Football Champ	Sun Sep 23 23:47:24 Yes, for example this guy was too much of a party animal for this exact same seat. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Douglas_H._Ginsburg
Hot Rod Revved Up	Sun Sep 23 23:52:26 tw, along with his leaders and cohorts are habitual liars and their brains, what is left of them, is pure evil.
Dukhat Member	Sun Sep 23 23:52:45 Cuckservatives always have some idiot conspiracy theory that they heard through the grapevine that turns out to be patently false. Fucktards can’t admit the obvious. Trump is a fucking imbecile that doesn’t vet his nominations which is why so many have gone down in flames despite total GOP control. Fucking ignorant cunts.
obaminated Member	Mon Sep 24 00:41:22 cuckhat likes to believe accusations. he doesn't care about evidence.
hood Member	Mon Sep 24 00:49:15 Like benghazi?
obaminated Member	Mon Sep 24 00:55:53 only there was evidence in that case. but yeah hood, let's distract from the issue because the left really has nothing to stand on with these flimsy 40 year old accusations.
hood Member	Mon Sep 24 01:01:37 There wasn't any evidence of what the republicans claimed, despite their 6!? investigations. "let's distract from the issue" If it works for the administration... But really, what these accusations amount to is that Kavanaugh is a fucking horrible pick. At best, he clearly makes some pretty fucking bad decisions and it is epidemic. At worst, he's a borderline (or full on?) rapist.
jergul large member	Mon Sep 24 01:06:19 Obam Is the information credible? Is it relevant? What should happen? I find it credible in both cases. I find it relevant in both cases. No confirmation until after the midterms. The GOP can confirm some other Trump candidate if it still has the power to do so. The alternative looks like the GOP can confirm, but suffer voter mobilization as a backlash that will likely cost them house and senate.
jergul large member	Mon Sep 24 01:06:50 endemic*
jergul large member	Mon Sep 24 01:13:58 I should also mention that the allegations in themselves render him unfit for the office. How is he supposed to maintain an objective opinion on legal position that even touch on he said she said rulings?
jergul large member	Mon Sep 24 01:22:28 http://www...-college-years-deborah-ramirez Ouch.
tumbleweed the wanderer	Mon Sep 24 01:28:00 " [Kavanaugh's roommate] said that he never witnessed Kavanaugh engage in any sexual misconduct, but did recall him being “frequently, incoherently drunk.” " frat boy goin down... maybe...
obaminated Member	Mon Sep 24 01:28:48 He drank alcohol in college!
hood Member	Mon Sep 24 01:50:26 "He drank alcohol in college and allegedly assaulted women!" ^ fixed that for you.
Dukhat Member	Mon Sep 24 02:47:48 Kavanaugh’s anthem in college was, "No means yes. Yes means Anal." Which is of course the rallying cry of Sam and obaminated and all the other cuckservatives at their all-male meetings. But for those of us not in prison; all these accusations shed a light on a rich white frat boy at best and a rapist at worst. Which isn’t to say I don’t disagree with those say that Kavanaugh’s legal record and work should have more weight. But given that Republicans have stonewalled access to much of his writings while working for Bush and that his record shows a level of extreme devotion to corporate interests over the public good along with the typical ness of his neocon views; the country is undeniably better without another Thomas on the court. Funny thing is Trump could’ve picked someone that was an actual Boy Scout like Gorsuch off his handpicked shortlist of candidates. He chose Kavanaugh instead because he wanted a goon that would protect him from Mueller.
mexicantardnado Member	Mon Sep 24 03:33:37 Duuuuuur I drink duuuuur it doesn't duuuur lessen my duuuur inhibitions duuuuur at all duuuuuuur.
werewolf dictator Member	Mon Sep 24 12:56:45 kavanaugh has careful calendar schedule from supposed year of ford accusation listing all his plans.. he was mostly not in town during that summer and at no time has mention of party with people ford alleges [and none of those people ford says was there remembering it either] in new allegation the new york times and washington post had story but wouldn't run it.. ramirez wasn't sure if it was kavanaugh but claimed a number of other people were there.. and again nobody supposedly there knows what she's talking about also worth noting that liberal feminists [like debra katz] was all saying that it was no big deal if everything paula jones said was true of bill clinton because that's not harassment much less assault
Dukhat Member	Mon Sep 24 13:27:33 Werewolf with breitbart talking points most as always
werewolf dictator Member	Mon Sep 24 13:32:55 more like new york times and washington post talking points and liberal feminist democrats talking points years after alleged kavanaugh accusation in college [so leftist jackasses can't give "norms have changed since then" bullshit]
Dukhat Member	Mon Sep 24 13:59:47 No Breitbart talking points. We all know you don't read and are illiterate in every field.
Sam Adams Member	Mon Sep 24 14:05:08 "Werewolf with breitbart talking points" Says the guy that never takes an opinion that contradicts huffpo.
werewolf dictator Member	Mon Sep 24 14:05:24 very consistent and convincing arguments as usual dumbass
tumbleweed the wanderer	Mon Sep 24 14:24:40 the calendar has little meaning... (and why does he have a 35 yr old calendar?) the 'party' was like 6 people, doesn't sound like a planned event that one would put on a calendar
werewolf dictator Member	Mon Sep 24 14:29:58 it had to be planned if ford claim is true that these "parties" were spread word-of-mouth beforehand why are people keeping old yearbooks and crap.. personally i could get hold of lots of old notebooks and crap from when i was 17 if i had some reason
hood Member	Mon Sep 24 14:32:46 "it had to be planned if ford claim is true that these "parties" were spread word-of-mouth beforehand" You're retarded.
werewolf dictator Member	Mon Sep 24 14:35:53 so she heard of party beforehand that wasn't planned sure
tumbleweed the wanderer	Mon Sep 24 14:39:51 they are at a pool or beach (she had a swimsuit on)... 'hey let's go to ___'s house', some guy: 'hang on a sec while i invite my drunken rapist friend' done & done
werewolf dictator Member	Mon Sep 24 14:44:29 "She said she often spent time in the summer at the Columbia Country Club pool in Chevy Chase, where in those pre-cellphone days, teenagers learned about gatherings via word of mouth. She also doesn’t recall who owned the house or how she got there." - wapo ... "Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh is planning to give the Senate Judiciary Committee calendars from his high school years his legal team argues will back up his denial of sexual misconduct allegations, The New York Times reported on Sunday. The calendars reportedly show that Kavanaugh was away for most of the summer in 1982, the year that Christine Blasey Ford claims Kavanaugh assaulted her at a party. According to the Times, the calendars include details about other gatherings that he attended, but do not include details about a party similar to the one detailed by Ford. Kavanaugh's lawyers acknowledged to the Times that Kavanaugh could have attended a party that he did not list on the calendars, but they are planning to argue that it proves there is no corroboration for her account. - the hill ... it would be convenient if this "party" with sjw was not one put in calendar [and that none of the people there remember.. just like with even more multiple witnesses in room seeing supposed incident with other sjw]
werewolf dictator Member	Mon Sep 24 14:53:06 also i like the woman from high school who said it was big rumor buzz at all girl school in summer [when ford told no one for decades and who says kavanaugh definitely did this].. and then she deletes her social media and has no idea if allegation is true
tumbleweed the wanderer	Mon Sep 24 14:53:52 did he note on his calendar when he proudly joined the "Beach Week Ralph Club"? (ralphing means vomiting) "in those pre-cellphone days, teenagers learned about gatherings via word of mouth" this actually backs up not being a calendar-worthy event... you would only note pre-cellphone if you meant it was a spontaneous event, if it was days in advance, who cares about having cellphone access all 6 could've been at the pool same time & went together, or ran into each other at some nearby restaurant
werewolf dictator Member	Mon Sep 24 14:54:42 "who says kavanaugh definitely did this" - meaning woman who says she remembers rumor buzz
werewolf dictator Member	Mon Sep 24 15:00:53 he could have attended party with big foot with loch ness monster in pool since absolutely proving negative is impossible but this comes about as close as conceivable to such vague claims.. where only specifics have no recollections from people allegedly there
werewolf dictator Member	Mon Sep 24 15:13:31 imagine scenario where paula jones claimed she thinks bill clinton groped her feminine body parts and pulled out his penis in a room full of witnesses.. and nobody supposedly there remembered anything about it this is kind of things that needs to be believed if at least some of these accusers aren't lying or having false memories about some potential supreme court justice from the wrong party they don't want there
The Sentinel Member	Mon Sep 24 15:34:04 Werewolf is right. Waiting 30 years to report sexual assault or abuse my priest is an outrage. By women though we should doubt em.
patom Member	Mon Sep 24 15:39:26 The fix is in. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has declared that Kavanaugh is innocent and will soon be sworn in and seated on the Supreme Court. If I were guilty of a crime, I would love to hear one of my Judges declare my innocence before the trial is even heard. Win Win Win.
tumbleweed the wanderer	Mon Sep 24 15:50:20 yeah, Mitch has given no indication he cares about any allegations... although he's been shameless throughout, i'm sure he'd have no problem nominating someone in Trump's final year despite what he did w/ Merrick Garland the Avenatti allegations are a lot stronger than the penis to the face one :p but i don't have full faith he'll come through with the supposed accuser
Sam Adams Member	Mon Sep 24 15:50:36 Half the dems have judged him guilty at the same time.
TJ Member	Mon Sep 24 15:53:49 Half is being overly generous.
tumbleweed the wanderer	Mon Sep 24 15:59:25 if the 'frequently incoherently drunk' is the case, combined w/ stuff like his 'tit & clit' society, i think it's fair to call him a liar in denying anything ever happened i wouldn't trust his memory at all, if he comes out & says i spent my youth as a drunken womanizer but i am a changed man then i'd respect him :p (i'm going to doubt he'll do that though)
werewolf dictator Member	Mon Sep 24 16:02:01 the sentinel is right if accused of pulling out penis in room of [x] number of witnesses and 100% of [x] don't remember [or lie about not remembering] then it should be believed [not sure x has been disclosed but it's multiple and more than in high school incident next] then when another guy in room where football player is failing to rape younger girl and possibly kill her.. and 100% streak of no memory continues.. then believe.. and 100% streak of two others in house who might remember party or odd screaming.. or that 100% could not remember being source of rumor reaching all girls school in summer.. then listen and believe this 100%.record of forgotten memories [or lying about not recalling] is much more plausible than a tiny percentage of people vaguely in kavanaugh's life [or more distant] who could possibly lie or have false memories about supreme court nominee of party they're against also.. gloria steinam was great feminist supporting bill clinton against paula jones and totally right about satanic ritual abuse epidemic
Rugian Member	Mon Sep 24 18:22:34 Dukhat Member Sun Sep 23 23:52:45 Fucktards can’t admit the obvious. Trump is a fucking imbecile that doesn’t vet his nominations which is why so many have gone down in flames despite total GOP control. Okay, I'll bite. What sort of vetting process would have reasonably been likely to expose claims of a 36 year old groping incident?
Dukhat Member	Mon Sep 24 19:45:51 The solution is so simple. Withdraw his nomination and pick someone else. This guy wasn't even on the shortlist the Republicans gave Trump. Trump picked him because he wanted an executive privelege guy who would cover his ass against the Mueller investigation.
Hot Rod Revved Up	Mon Sep 24 22:22:17 Wrong asshole.
kargen Member	Mon Sep 24 22:31:19 "Trump picked him because he wanted an executive privelege guy who would cover his ass against the Mueller investigation." We all know Trump would be off the hook long before anything got to the Supreme Court.
tumbleweed the wanderer	Mon Sep 24 22:37:07 how do we know that? if Trump tries to duck a subpoena it could end up at the Supreme Court Kavanaugh decided after wanting to know how many times Monica sucked Bill's dick that a President shouldn't be hassled w/ investigations while in office
tumbleweed the wanderer	Mon Sep 24 23:18:59 "The Democrats are working hard to destroy a wonderful man, and a man who has the potential to be one of our greatest Supreme Court Justices ever, with an array of False Accusations the likes of which have never been seen before!" ~guess - greatest justice in history - accusations the likes of which have never been seen in history ...this guy is such an idiot
Aeros Member	Mon Sep 24 23:20:38 "Withdraw his nomination and pick someone else." And give #metoo a victory with nothing more then unproven accusations, no evidence, and none of the accusers making official testimony under penalty of felony perjury? No.
Hot Rod Revved Up	Mon Sep 24 23:58:46 I agree with Aeros.
Pillz Member	Tue Sep 25 00:00:32 It's worth the sacrifice, just hold on aeros.
Dukhat Member	Tue Sep 25 00:13:16 Aeros went full retard. The accusers wanted an fbi investigation and their accusations have been corroborated enough to be credible. Mark Judge the asshole friend vehemently denied the event ever happening when interviewed by conservative sources and then refused to testify saying he didn’t recall the event thereby changing his story. The gop could easily clear the air by taking the time to provide some kind of due process. They aren’t. No fbi background check. No callin up of any witnesses. Just a mad rush to put a lying piece of shit on the supreme court. Funny to see Aeros cuck himself. Go ahead and Vote with your emotions instead of your brains. Nobody gives a fuck.
hood Member	Tue Sep 25 00:15:48 "And give #metoo a victory with nothing more then unproven accusations, no evidence, and none of the accusers making official testimony under penalty of felony perjury? No." Yes, fuck yourself in your already broken asshole with a dragon dildo just because you want to spite some people. Great fucking idea.
Dukhat Member	Tue Sep 25 00:21:22 The Hawiian senator that triggered aeros has stage iv cancer btw. She interrupted her treatment to go back to vote to save the ACA so that all americans could have access to healthcare. Judge people by their deeds and not some anecdotal bullshit. Kavanaugh was a shitty judge anyways and he has constantly dissembled throughout the whole process. The fact that he was probably the typical rich kid frat boy is the icing on a shit case.
Dukhat Member	Tue Sep 25 00:21:39 Cake*
Aeros Member	Tue Sep 25 00:44:57 I will be more then willing to entertain that these accusations are true if there is something to back it up. Testifying under the threat of 5 years in prison does fall under evidence incidentally. Right now there is nothing but consequence free statements with nothing to back it up. If Ford is willing to risk half a decade in prison (and considering the stakes here, maximum punishment would be certain) to keep up the accusation, then that definitely lends support to her charge.
kargen Member	Tue Sep 25 00:49:53 "Mark Judge the asshole friend vehemently denied the event ever happening when interviewed by conservative sources and then refused to testify saying he didn’t recall the event thereby changing his story." How the fuck can you recall an event that never happened? Seems to me he is sticking to his story. Wouldn't be much in the way of testimony. Question were you ever in a room where an incident like this occurred. Answer, no. End of testimony. " and their accusations have been corroborated enough to be credible." corroborated by who and/or what? We have a therapists notes that Ford herself has said are not accurate and nothing else. If Ford could remember even one more person that was at the party that would be a start. But she can't so nothing is all they got. "The gop could easily clear the air by taking the time to provide some kind of due process." They are even with democrats fighting them at every turn. There were six FBI background checks. There are no witnesses because Ford can't remember when it happened, where it happened nor anything else related to the night it was supposed to have taken place. She has already changed her mind on how many people were there and how much everybody had to drink. "The fact that he was probably the typical rich kid frat boy is the icing on a shit case." Sounds as if Ford was the typical rich kid sorority girl so kinda hard to play the rich white kid card on this one.
tumbleweed the wanderer	Tue Sep 25 01:10:23 Mark Judge should absolutely testify Kavanaugh can go in there and say he never drank heavily & was only sexually attracted to men... who is there to challenge or verify anything he says? why are the R's so determined not to have him (or anyone else testify) is the question
Aeros Member	Tue Sep 25 01:15:36 Kavenaugh cannot testify until after Ford has testified. That is standard practice. The accused must respond to the accuser. Doing it the other way around is patently unfair, as the the accused needs to know what precisely he is being accused of and what his defense needs to be. And you cannot do that until after the accuser has laid out their side of the story. It is why in court trials the prosecution makes the first opening statement, and the defense makes the last closing statement.
Dukhat Member	Tue Sep 25 01:17:20 Mark judge is unwilling to testify nothing happened. If he is sure, then he would risk 5 years prison like aeros says. But he knows that shit like that happened all the time because he is an alcoholic like Kavanaugh. Corroborated enough to be credible and warrant further investigation which the white house is not allowing. Bush 1 did it for thomas and it took 3 days. The background checks you listed are bullshit and ocurred before the allegations. There should be an independent fbi investigation into the allegations to determine their credibility. Republicans stonewalling means they have no intention of getting at the truth. All the changing her mind stuff is exaggerated. The importwnt information is there including most importantly the presence of mike judge. If kavanaugh and judge were to both testify, then the weight would be against ford. But judge refuses and kavanaugh has already been caught lying about many other things already. Bashing the victim is very hot in conservative circles but that time has passed for the rest of us. Ford is not the one being accused of being a rapist and more importantly a seat on the supreme court. Every day is revealing more information. Kavanaugh's yale roommate for example has added he believes the 2nd accuser and said Kavanaugh was a chronic alcoolic. Another accuser is currently talking to Maryland police. One women may be lying but two? How about 3 or 4? The power of metoo was in the pattern of deviancy. Kavanaugh's a shithead anyways. Nominate hardiman and be done with it. This is trump trying to cover his own fucking ass which he knows is toast despite partisans like kargen thinking thst truno is innocent.
Dukhat Member	Tue Sep 25 01:18:25 Trump is innocent*
tumbleweed the wanderer	Tue Sep 25 10:45:39 @Aeros (at the moment) Ford is set to testify Thursday, then Kavanaugh, then no one to verify or contradict anything so a fairly useless exercise Avenatti supposedly having another accuser come forward w/in 48 hrs but he better watch out for false flag ops from people (like Fox News hosts) who want to bring him down + the Kavanaugh accusers
hood Member	Tue Sep 25 11:08:37 "Kavenaugh cannot testify until after Ford has testified. That is standard practice." Never become lawyer, because you're retarded (and wrong). Yes, the prosecution (or plaintiff's side) begins first, but there's not a single ounce of rule that states the actual accuser must testify.
Republican Rod Member	Tue Sep 25 11:20:55 Did you know that all of the ones being accused of sexual misconduct were once Democrats. That should tell you something.
tumbleweed the wanderer	Tue Sep 25 13:14:42 the old men have hired a female lawyer to do the questioning... but won't release her name "for her safety"... hard to imagine that's the real concern as presumably she won't be wearing a mask at the hearing
obaminated Member	Tue Sep 25 14:21:26 " The accusers wanted an fbi investigation and their accusations have been corroborated enough to be credible. " Do you even know what an FBI background check is? They look into criminal history, any laws on the books that have been broken. asking the FBI to investigate a 36 year old sexual assault case is a way to distract ignorant people like you who don't know that the FBI doesn't do that. That'd be local PD who have already said there isn't enough evidence to merit investigating. "Yes, the prosecution (or plaintiff's side) begins first, but there's not a single ounce of rule that states the actual accuser must testify." What a pointless statement. No lawyer in the world would agree to have their client testify before knowing any specifics of what they are being accused of. Truly a remarkably stupid point you are trying to make there, hood.
obaminated Member	Tue Sep 25 14:22:44 "but won't release her name "for her safety"... hard to imagine that's the real concern as presumably she won't be wearing a mask at the hearing" yeah, it isn't like rabid leftists are chasing ideological opponents out of public places, sending death threats and in general being goaded by liberal politicians into behaving borderline violently.
obaminated Member	Tue Sep 25 14:27:13 Re-hood - you are also wrong, read up on the 6th amendment.
tumbleweed the wanderer	Tue Sep 25 14:42:52 "No lawyer in the world would agree to have their client testify before knowing any specifics of what they are being accused of" well he was happy to go on Fox News & address the accusations w/ well-rehearsed answers last night however, this is moot, she's going first on Thursday... unless spooked
obaminated Member	Tue Sep 25 14:45:23 "well he was happy to go on Fox News & address the accusations w/ well-rehearsed answers last night " it is pretty funny that you bitch about us becoming idiocracy, and then you post that and think it somehow applies to what i wrote.
kargen Member	Tue Sep 25 15:20:23 "The importwnt information is there including most importantly the presence of mike judge." Okay one more time just for you. She has named two people claiming something was done at an unspecified date and unspecified time when she may or may not (depending on which time she told the story) have been so drunk she couldn't remember how she got to the party nor how she got home. She can't remember one other person that was at the party nor how many people may have been at the party. She can't remember where the party was. All she has is one summer in a house somewhere something happened. How the fuck would bringing in judge clear anything up at all. What is there to testify about related to this case? We all know the Democrats would ask him have you ever seen Kavanaugh drink a beer then when he says yes they all shout AH-HA and start their dribble about him not being qualified. I doubt there is a DA anywhere in the country that would proceed on a case with such a small amount of evidence. Ford will get to say her piece Kavanaugh will get to respond then the Senate can decide should he be a judge or not. Stretching out the process in farther with "witnesses" would do nothing but waste time.
Dukhat Member	Tue Sep 25 15:23:34 The people will decide if that is enough. We already know what the cuckservative peanut gallery thinks. And Murkowski is now saying that an FBI investigation would help clear things up. It's the Republican women who have power this time around.
hood Member	Tue Sep 25 15:25:13 "No lawyer in the world would agree to have their client testify before knowing any specifics of what they are being accused of." You're retarded. Once you figure out what testify means and how it relates to a trial, you may correct your extreme stupidity. "Re-hood - you are also wrong, read up on the 6th amendment." You are again extremely retarded. In fact, I'm worried that you're a danger to yourself. Nobody (except a judge) has any rights to force someone to testify. The 6th amendment means you have the right to know your accuser, to to know the charges/accusations. It doesn't mean that the accuser must actually stand up in court and provide evidence to the court. Be sure to wear your helmet before leaving the house.
obaminated Member	Tue Sep 25 15:45:01 Hood, if some twat accuses you of raping her, you have the right to challenge her. She can't plead the fifth like a defendant can. you moron.
hood Member	Tue Sep 25 16:09:39 That doesn't mean she has to testify, you fucknut.
tumbleweed the wanderer	Tue Sep 25 16:25:19 judging by Kavanaughs' Fox News interview where he claimed to be a wholesome choir boy, Judge (or others) should be there to give their accounts so the judges can judge his character for the judge position properly
hood Member	Tue Sep 25 16:28:06 Example #1: This fictional twat submits a hospital record of a positive rape kit and DNA testing matching yours. Evidence is fairly convincing and doesn't require the twat to make a peep in open court. Example #2: Witnesses can testify (take care to see how this word is fucking used) to judge/jury/whoever that they saw you bring a drink to the twat, she was unconscious a few minutes later, and they saw you dragging her to an empty bedroom and lock the door. Again, twat likely doesn't have to say a word in court. Example #3: Home surveillance records a video of you attacking the twat outside of her home, pinning her against the wall, forcing yourself inside the twat's twat, all with clear and visible resistance from said twat. I, again, doubt that the twat would ever have to utter a word in court. You clearly do not understand words or what testify means. Don't forget your helmet, you are retarded.
kargen Member	Tue Sep 25 16:41:33 Maybe something is wrong with the process. I suggest we change things up a little. Bring a keg into the hearing and everybody get a pitcher. Each Senator gets to ask five "I never" questions. yep just play a game of I never. Any time you've done something one of the senators claim to have not done you drink. Not just the nominee drinks but everybody drinks. At the end of the questioning if the nominee is more sober than the senators he is in. And of course they all have to be honest in their drinking. If it is to close to call the nominee gets to ask 10 questions. And we could play at home!
obaminated Member	Tue Sep 25 16:44:01 None of your 3 examples apply to this case. There is no dna evidence. No video evidence. No corroborating witnesses. This is why i literally framed my scenario yo match what we are actually talking about, not some random jewboy fantasy you come up with to make your claim valid. If it is a she said he said, as in this case, she needs to testify and kav has the right to challenge her. Moron.
obaminated Member	Tue Sep 25 16:55:07 If she doesn't testify, there is no case and itd be dismissed. Now obviously this is in front of congress and not a judge (you are also wrong, Congress can compel you to answer their questions, not just judges). But the same expectations of law and order should be applied before we tar and feather a guy who has otherwise had a spotless career in the public sector.
hood Member	Tue Sep 25 16:58:38 "None of your 3 examples apply to this case." Nobody fucking claimed they did, you ignorant fucknut. Let me rerun this for you: 1. Aeros claimed that the plaintiff must always testify before the defendant, it was a standard. 2. I pointed out that not only is he heinously wrong, but that the plaintiff doesn't even have to fucking testify (and nor does the defendant, really). 3. You saw "[no] rule that states the actual accuser must testify" and went full on retard about completely unrelated 6th amendment crap. "If it is a she said he said, as in this case, she needs to testify and kav has the right to challenge her. Moron." Sure, I never disputed that. However, that was completely unrelated to my post addressing Aeros' mental deficiencies. Aeros claimed that Kavanaugh's accuser must testify first per some fantasy standard he made up. He is wrong. If you would like to defend his statement, feel free. If you're just budding in with something completely unrelated, well there's this thing about going full retard and how you shouldn't do it. So to sum up: - Yes, the lady in this (Kavanaugh's) case will have to testify. - No, there is no standard to who must testify first. - obaminated cannot comprehend hypothetical or theorycraft discussions. - In general, there is no compulsion of a plaintiff to testify.
Forwyn Member	Tue Sep 25 18:29:04 rofl ----- tumbleweed the wanderer Sun Sep 23 22:11:37 Michael Avenatti (or 'Creepy Porn Lawyer' to those who watch the joke News channels) has also posted this letter he sent to the committee about Kavanaugh at gang-rape parties: http://pbs.twimg.com/media/Dn0mJm8WsAAX2kI.jpg & tweeted: " Brett Kavanaugh must also be asked about this entry in his yearbook: "FFFFFFFourth of July." We believe that this stands for: Find them, French them, Feel them, Finger them, F*ck them, Forget them. As well as the term "Devil's Triangle." Perhaps Sen. Grassley can ask him. ----- rofl
tumbleweed the wanderer	Tue Sep 25 18:51:15 here's his yearbook synopsis w/ multiple questionable items including the FFFFFFFourth & Devil's Triangle references & two Keg items i'd heard the 'beach week ralph club' before, not sure why some are excluding him designating himself as the largest contributor (of vomit... unless someone has a different interpretation) http://ima...tory_image/DnTyG9MUwAYDSku.jpg (annotations not by me) i'm not saying being a drunken dick disqualifies him, but lying about it does
tumbleweed the wanderer	Tue Sep 25 18:54:09 "Renate Alumnius" is a reference to him & buddies all doing something? with a girl named Renate & making a yearbook joke of her... as noted in another thread here
tumbleweed the wanderer	Tue Sep 25 18:59:54 Boofing: "The act of inserting drugs into the anus for a longer trip." ~urban dictionary not sure if that's his definition, but why not ask? :p (i would guess sex is his definition)
McKobb Member	Tue Sep 25 19:31:20 https://bloximages.chicago2.vip.townnews.com/tucson.com/content/tncms/assets/v3/editorial/4/39/4398674d-3484-5e81-ae0b-318cde7ed23c/5ba51d427abee.image.jpg?resize=1200%2C835
McKobb Member	Tue Sep 25 19:31:42 http://blo...ee.image.jpg?resize=1200%2C835
American Democrat Member	Wed Sep 26 05:05:59 I love it when people talk about court proceedings and they are completely ignorant of what actually takes place. And then compare a congressional hearing and court room and cannot tell the difference. Or the fact they do not understand what amendments actually allow you to do or not to do. "No corroborating witnesses." Except for four.
American Democrat Member	Wed Sep 26 05:20:46 "Do you even know what an FBI background check is? They look into criminal history, any laws on the books that have been broken. asking the FBI to investigate a 36 year old sexual assault case is a way to distract ignorant people like you who don't know that the FBI doesn't do that. That'd be local PD who have already said there isn't enough evidence to merit investigating. " I've addressed this with kargen already and you fail victim to it as well as you don't understand what the background check entails for a supreme justice nominee. "Among the questions -------- was asked: Have you ever engaged in kinky sex? Did you shoplift as a kid? What about any associations with groups like the Klu Klux Klan? Ever abuse a girlfriend? Engage in cruelty to animals? And tell us about sex in college: How often, how many women, and did you ever contract a venereal disease?" http://www...hind-supreme-court-nominations
mexicantardnado Member	Wed Sep 26 06:53:46 Duuuuuuuur I duuuur just duuuur joke duuur around and duuur leave duuur I'm duuuur not duuur expected duuur to have duuuuuur any duuuur subject matter duuuuur knowledge
Hot Rod Revved Up	Wed Sep 26 07:30:37 Liberals are EVIL.
Hot Rod Revved Up	Wed Sep 26 07:30:56 -30-
	show deleted posts