Welcome to the Utopia Forums! Register a new account
The current time is Thu Apr 25 06:22:21 2024
Utopia Talk / Politics / Soyuz disintegrated with men aboard
Sam Adams
Member | Thu Oct 11 08:39:11 But the capsule was intact and landed safely some 200 miles downrange. An American and russian were crew and are both reported uninjured. Woa! Helluva ride! Thats pretty cool. |
Cthulhu
Tentacle Rapist | Thu Oct 11 10:17:08 Sure beats what happens when a space shuttle disintegrates with men on board. |
jergul
large member | Thu Oct 11 10:41:19 http://tass.com/ Timestamp was interesting. It took Tass 28 minutes to make an emergency notice on a possible disaster after it initially posted about the launch. As opposed to close to a week to publish information on the Chernobyl meltdown. |
jergul
large member | Thu Oct 11 10:42:44 Lulz, the launch had a 70 million dollar insurance policy. |
Sam Adams
Member | Thu Oct 11 10:57:40 Sounds like a major failure near stage 1 cutout and stage 2 light. Pretty high altitude and speed. Plenty of debris on the video and launch control seemed surprise so i think "disintegration" is the right word to use. Less violent than challenger but still it sounds like capsule jettison worked properly and saved their lives! |
Paramount
Member | Thu Oct 11 11:01:50 Is there a video? |
Cthulhu
Tentacle Rapist | Thu Oct 11 11:19:25 'Lulz, the launch had a 70 million dollar insurance policy' Probably with a list of exemptions as long as your arm. The underwriters will determine that one of the engineers was negligent and it will never pay. Lulz! |
hood
Member | Fri Oct 12 07:22:08 "Lulz, the launch had a 70 million dollar insurance policy." Assuredly less than the cost of the rocket. Not like someone's gonna scuttle a rocket for $70 mil insurance. |
Seb
Member | Fri Oct 12 09:27:05 I think you can only insure the payload. |
hood
Member | Fri Oct 12 09:55:38 Sounds reasonable. But payloads generally don't want to have to collect insurance. |
Seb
Member | Fri Oct 12 10:29:02 Hood: Yeah, absolutely. But at least it's better than also being £100m out of pocket too! |
hood
Member | Fri Oct 12 10:38:05 Certainly. It just sounded like jergul was suggesting some sort of intent to destroy the rocket with insurance payouts involved. Thats just not likely at all. |
Seb
Member | Fri Oct 12 12:55:55 Oh, I see. I didn't pick up on that - thought he was more likely lulzing on the payout. |
hood
Member | Fri Oct 12 15:38:54 Also possible. |
jergul
large member | Sat Oct 13 01:31:56 I was lulzing that the launch was not self-insured. |
jergul
large member | Sat Oct 13 01:32:29 State actors usually roll that way. |
jergul
large member | Sat Oct 13 01:35:04 Gah. I should get coffee first. Anyway, in my ongoing stream of consciousness; the payload was owned by the state (obviously). |
Seb
Member | Sat Oct 13 02:39:42 Hmmm Yeah, if the payload is Russian cosmonauts that's a bit unusual. Normally it's the owner of the payload that gets issuance against the launch operator blowing up their precious satellite. |
Hrothgar
Member | Sat Oct 13 13:58:20 Amazing that the emergency procedures worked out just as envisioned. From recognition there was a problem to successful separation of the module from the rocket. |
Cthulhu
Tentacle Rapist | Wed Oct 24 13:08:46 'Hmmm Yeah, if the payload is Russian cosmonauts that's a bit unusual. ' Why not insure the cosmonauts? You can easily do it under a key employee business policy. How much does it cost to train one of them? |
Seb
Member | Wed Oct 24 13:36:43 Cthulhu: It's easier and cheaper for the state to self insure. Same reason few states use private providers for their direct employees pension schemes. |
show deleted posts |