Welcome to the Utopia Forums! Register a new account
The current time is Sat Sep 19 23:23:58 2020

Utopia Talk / Politics / Liberal media seems pro kiddy porn
Habebe
Member
Mon Sep 14 23:51:00
Now I want to clarify a few things. That is not hyperbole which do often use in my posts.

This is regarding the movie " cuties" which admittedly I have not watched.

I have however seen edited clips and descriptions of. Enough that I can say it's kiddie porn.

This should not be a left or right wing issue. I can also attest that I know plebty of liberals and none have supported this film anf seem as disgusted with it as anyone else.

Tulsi, a moderate Democrat has even caught flack for calling this out as softcover child porn .

Rolling stone and the new Yorker however claim such positions are alt-right extremism. Outside of these super-liberal* echo chambers I know no one who has such views.

Fox news> The Net Yorker/ Rolling Stone.... At least in this situation.

http://youtu.be/GvFyhqSE51A

The link is a review and description of the movie. It also highlights several ultra liberal media articles in it.

These are extremists in the vocal far left. Most liberals Would probably actually agree this movie is terrible.

Also there is a post about Tulsi going pro Qannon in here, I think Rugian posted it.The post isnpointing out the absurdity of the claim.
hood
Member
Tue Sep 15 00:03:49
Cheerleader outfits = porn? Yeah, "not hyperbole." hot rod strikes again.
Habebe
Member
Tue Sep 15 00:07:11
First off, there is apparently underage bare breasts.

Also the movie has repeated close ups of 11 year olds dancing proactively and twerking in panties all in close ups of ass and crotch.

The link has edited clips. By edited I mean they put a clown face over the close ups of childrens assets and crotches. See for yourself.

I really don't think you know what your talking abput here.
Im better then you
2012 UP Football Champ
Tue Sep 15 00:26:59
Jesus you people are fucking idoits... The directer may have gone too far but her goal was clearly to condemn sexing of children.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cuties

The plot revolves around a French-Senegalese girl with a traditional Muslim upbringing who is caught between traditional values and Internet culture. According to the filmmakers, the film is intended to criticize the hypersexualisation of pre-adolescent girls
Habebe
Member
Tue Sep 15 00:32:24
Ibty, And in order to this she needed repeated scenes of close ups of 11 year old girls asses and crotches?

Initially I was skeptical as well, thinking people were just being overly wierd about it, but seeing the clips and descriptions, this is clearly aimed at pedophiles and normalizing pedophilia.
Habebe
Member
Tue Sep 15 00:34:24
http://youtu.be/GvFyhqSE51A

Again do this review has some good info on it.

See the clips, decide for yourself.
Wrath of Orion
Member
Tue Sep 15 00:37:03
Yeah, because nothing removed from its wider context has ever come across badly or been portrayed to be something it's not intended to be...

I have no idea about the movie and have no interest in watching it. But I certainly wouldn't be making claims it's attempting to normalize pedophilia without actually watching the entire film. That's just retarded.
Im better then you
2012 UP Football Champ
Tue Sep 15 00:38:45
I know the poster is werid and the trailer is gross, but this isn't a political if anything it promotes "family values".
hood
Member
Tue Sep 15 00:40:38
"First off, there is apparently underage bare breasts."

Absolute hearsay. And further, I am 99.9999999999999% certain a complete fucking lie. Such a scene would almost instantly make every single person involved in the movie criminals in almost any country. That said, this would -actually- count as porn. Feel free to provide proof of this claim.


"the movie has repeated close ups of 11 year olds dancing proactively"

This is not porn.


"twerking in panties all in close ups of ass and crotch."

This is not porn.


"The link has edited clips. By edited I mean they put a clown face over the close ups of childrens assets and crotches. See for yourself."

I checked it. There was no porn. Perhaps, in your limited vocabulary, you were not able to grasp words like "lewd" or phrases like "sexualizing children" to properly express yourself. Note: neither of those concepts are porn. Porn is sexual acts or organs displayed to elicit sexual pleasure. Clothed acts to elicit sexual pleasure is, in fact, not porn. Or, it hasn't been since at least Betty Paige's era.

Anyone defending the show by saying "it isn't porn" (pending the long shot of your bare breasts comment being true) is accurate.




And then I read that the movie is French. My arguments all stand, except for my confidence that underage breasts don't make an appearance. Confidence level dropped to 50%.
kargen
Member
Tue Sep 15 00:41:07
When this first started getting attention there was a meme of the poster and below what was suppose to be Netflix description of the movie. The description was fabricated to provide shock. Most the indignation came from that.
Then Netflix replaced the poster with a less provocative poster. Another series of messages appeared stating Netflix changed to a less provocative poster and changed the description. It then went on to post the original description (the false one) to create a 2nd wave of indignation.
There is no underage bare breasts. According to some that have seen the film the eleven year old girls look at a social media site of some woman getting likes for baring her breasts and they wonder if they should do things like that.
Here is a decent commentary on the film.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=asxBUrx-Wfg
Habebe
Member
Tue Sep 15 00:41:41
"But I certainly wouldn't be making claims it's attempting to normalize pedophilia without actually watching the entire film"

Yeah, because you couldn't tell from clips and reviews that Debby does Dallas is a porno...

Or that starwars is a sci fi movie about space wizards.
Habebe
Member
Tue Sep 15 00:43:09
Hood, The guy who calls me hotrod 2, literally defending child exploitation videos...

Projecting much?
Habebe
Member
Tue Sep 15 00:48:43
Ever hear the story of the jewish child molester?

He would jump out of the bushes and say " Hey little boy, want to BUY some candy?"

His name was hood.
Im better then you
2012 UP Football Champ
Tue Sep 15 00:50:06
Pretty lame story.
Wrath of Orion
Member
Tue Sep 15 00:52:43
I asked Retard Rod this a number of times, and now I'm going ask version 2.0 the same thing. How the fuck do you even make it through a single day with such a low intellect?
Paramount
Member
Tue Sep 15 00:58:13
” The plot revolves around a French-Senegalese girl with a traditional Muslim upbringing who is caught between traditional values and Internet culture.”


So it’s basically a movie about a young muslim girl who is caught between traditional decent values and American culture such as twerking?
Habebe
Member
Tue Sep 15 01:03:31
That's hilarious coming from.woo.

When was the last competent statement he has made that actually added anything of substance to anything?

Perhaps a little dunning-kruger effect going on there?
Wrath of Orion
Member
Tue Sep 15 01:04:29
Uh, try this thread, retard.
Habebe
Member
Tue Sep 15 01:04:57
Eyeroll*
Wrath of Orion
Member
Tue Sep 15 01:07:43
Let me spell it out for you, since you're obviously incapable of figuring this out on your own.

If we're to believe Cuties is really criticizing the hypersexualization of young girls, it sounds like it's using subtext to do so. Directly doing so would more likely be a documentary, not an actual film. And it doesn't sound like a documentary.

So using two examples of understanding something about films that requires no subtext is FUCKING RETARDED when comparing that to a film that almost certainly requires subtext to make its point.
hood
Member
Tue Sep 15 01:08:12
"literally defending child exploitation videos"

Actually, defending the purity of porn. But I can see how you would mistake the two. See, in my world, children and porn don't mix.
Wrath of Orion
Member
Tue Sep 15 01:09:01
Yeah, I know you don't think pretty much destroying your idiotic position is contributing anything, but it actually is.
Habebe
Member
Tue Sep 15 01:10:32
The point is if what the creator was actually going for was what she claims, there is no need for scenes of 11 year olds taking pictures of there nude vagina, there is no need to zoom in on there asses or crotches in sexualized dance scenes.

What is the point of such scenes?
Wrath of Orion
Member
Tue Sep 15 01:13:26
Films have been criticizing things by showing them and making audiences uncomfortable for decades upon decades. That's certainly not anything new.

But again, not having watched it, I can't really judge.

Also, I question whether this...

"there is no need for scenes of 11 year olds taking pictures of there nude vagina"

...is actually shown in the film.
Habebe
Member
Tue Sep 15 01:13:52
"If we're to believe Cuties is really criticizing the hypersexualization of young girls, it sounds like it's using subtext to do so"

And in order to do that they need close ups of children twerking in underwear and leather shorts why?

Wrath of Orion
Member
Tue Sep 15 01:15:03
See above.
Habebe
Member
Tue Sep 15 01:16:03

Woo, It is in the film. It doesn't show the nudity but it's definitely in there.

http://youtu.be/yfFvJn-SmyY
Habebe
Member
Tue Sep 15 01:16:04

Woo, It is in the film. It doesn't show the nudity but it's definitely in there.

http://youtu.be/yfFvJn-SmyY
Wrath of Orion
Member
Tue Sep 15 01:17:39
Again, I have no desire to see any of the film. I'm not following your links, but I also do not trust your judgement of what is actually in the film and isn't. You're clearly off the deep end here on at least some things, so there's no telling where else you're wrong.
Habebe
Member
Tue Sep 15 01:20:58
So you deny the shit Im claiming exists, and refuse to acknowledge the proof.

And yet were thw same on to claim one should watch the entire* film before criticizing

As you sit here and critisize me claiming im " off the deep end" while you refuse to even acknowledge proof....gotchya.
Wrath of Orion
Member
Tue Sep 15 01:22:03
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt9196192/parentalguide

Doesn't sound like nudity to me. So once again, it's very likely you're wrong...yet again.
Paramount
Member
Tue Sep 15 01:24:01
” there is no need for scenes of 11 year olds taking pictures of there nude vagina,”


Are there nude vaginas in the movie?
Wrath of Orion
Member
Tue Sep 15 01:25:13
According to my link, no.
Habebe
Member
Tue Sep 15 01:25:25
Would you feel better if it was labled as near porn?

This may be your dumbest argument yet, and that is saying something.

If porn is pixled out is it no not still a porno? I mean technically there is no nudity.
Wrath of Orion
Member
Tue Sep 15 01:26:33
Let's do a little test here... What do you think my argument actually is?
Habebe
Member
Tue Sep 15 01:28:56
Paramount, I never said ther was. I said

"
"there is no need for scenes of 11 year olds taking pictures of there nude vagina"

I never said they showed the pic of her vagina. But she clearly pulls her pants and underwear down and snaps a photo of her crotch.


http://youtu.be/yfFvJn-SmyY
Wrath of Orion
Member
Tue Sep 15 01:30:44
It's understandable that someone would think you meant there was nudity. I mean, you did post...

"First off, there is apparently underage bare breasts."

You claimed there was nudity. It's easy to see how someone could read that other quote of yours as claiming nudity.
Habebe
Member
Tue Sep 15 01:35:21
Can you not read " apparently"?

"as far as one knows or can see."

There was some controversy over whethet the breasts were of a minor or not. Now apparently* ( there is that word again) she was over 18.
Habebe
Member
Tue Sep 15 01:35:51
Also you are mixing up statements and intentionally being misleading.
Wrath of Orion
Member
Tue Sep 15 01:36:38
Fucking hell, lmfao...

You can't even own up to claiming there is underage nudity. Like I said, how the fuck do you even make it through a day?
Wrath of Orion
Member
Tue Sep 15 01:38:27
So let's go back to...

"Let's do a little test here... What do you think my argument actually is?"
Paramount
Member
Tue Sep 15 01:46:43
”she clearly pulls her pants and underwear down and snaps a photo of her crotch.


Yeah, but it is Western/American culture. The movie is showing how muslim culture is colliding with American culture, and it wants the viewer (us) to talk about this American culture and ask ourselves if twerking and taking photos of vaginas is something that it is good or not.

Maybe the movie can be seen as anti-American in the sense that it wants(?) people to get angry and attack a part of American traditions/culture with the aim of eradicating it and Islamicize America? lol
Habebe
Member
Tue Sep 15 01:46:58
You really are dense.

As for the argument O was referencing.

You said

" I certainly wouldn't be making claims it's attempting to normalize pedophilia without actually watching the entire film"

Then you go on to say

"
Also, I question whether this...

"there is no need for scenes of 11 year olds taking pictures of there nude vagina"

...is actually shown in the film."

Followed by you saying this.

"

I'm not following your links"

These are your words.
Habebe
Member
Tue Sep 15 01:48:47
Paramount, It takes place in France.
Wrath of Orion
Member
Tue Sep 15 01:50:59
How can you miss the point so badly? Is it possible you're actually dumber than the original Retard Rod?

The second quote is referencing the nudity part. I was not questioning whether the scene as a whole took place.

And again it looks like I was correct. My link claims there is no actual nudity. Now, you can claim you weren't saying there was actually nudity in that scene. Fair enough, but I've already addressed that point in a different post.
Wrath of Orion
Member
Tue Sep 15 01:52:12
So let's go back to...

"Let's do a little test here... What do you think my argument actually is?"

Why are you running from this question?
Paramount
Member
Tue Sep 15 01:54:30
” Paramount, It takes place in France”

Yes, but the phenomen of twerking comes from the US. It is an American tradition.
habebe
Member
Tue Sep 15 01:56:28
Must I spell it out to you?

you claim without seeing proof of things you won't make a judgement, and yet you beat around the bush ifnit by saying " Indoubt that is jn there" and refuse to accept the proof.

This would be like saying "I'm not going to make a judgement whether the world is flat or not because U havnt seen it from space, but I also refuse to to see any proof"

that is retarded, even for you.
habebe
Member
Tue Sep 15 01:58:45
paramount,Ok, but it's not so much the twerking itself as how it is shot and portrayed that is my issue.

This to me isn't wven a political issue.
Paramount
Member
Tue Sep 15 02:08:22
I’m guessing it is shot in the same way a man/boy would look at a woman/girl who is twerking.

I’m not against twerking. If women wants to twerk they can do it. I just think it looks fun or sometimes a bit ridicolous. Dunno about young children though. Their parents should probably teach their young children to stay away from it until they got older.
Wrath of Orion
Member
Tue Sep 15 02:08:39
My dear Retard Rod 2.0, you have missed the point again. That's why I like to have you spell things out - because it's hilarious to see you prove that you've missed the point so badly again and again.

"you claim without seeing proof of things you won't make a judgement, and yet you beat around the bush ifnit by saying " Indoubt that is jn there" and refuse to accept the proof."

While I understand you think this is retarded, you've pretty much mischaracterized my position by leaving out a lot of details. This is why I'm asking you to state what you think my position actually is.

I'm still waiting on that, btw. And you're still apparently running from the question.
Wrath of Orion
Member
Tue Sep 15 02:09:54
What kind of retarded gymnastics will you do this time to avoid answering that simple question?
Paramount
Member
Tue Sep 15 02:14:17
Not sure where twerking originates from (maybe from strip clubs?) and if it is meant to arouse men and if its purpose is to invite men for sex or to throw money at the woman.
habebe
Member
Tue Sep 15 02:15:01
I have answered your question numerous times, your just that retarded, I cant help you.
Wrath of Orion
Member
Tue Sep 15 02:16:15
Wow, then you're even more off base on what my position actually is than I thought. Those were your actual answers?

Good fucking lord...
Paramount
Member
Tue Sep 15 02:17:25
I’m going to watch the movie though. Hopefully I get to do it before the mob manage to get Netflix to censor it or ban it.
habebe
Member
Tue Sep 15 02:18:15
More brilliance from pedo woo.
Wrath of Orion
Member
Tue Sep 15 02:19:58
Someone please archive this thread. This is such a massive fail by Retard Rod 2.0 that it needs to be saved. And the best part is that he doesn't even realize it. This is TC multi levels of stupidity.
habebe
Member
Tue Sep 15 02:24:45
Please do archive this.

You seem to be having a breakdown.
habebe
Member
Tue Sep 15 02:27:01
I almost feel bad, your ranting in circles like your on the deep end of the spectrum.
Wrath of Orion
Member
Tue Sep 15 02:28:37
Says the person that can't even identify my point even though it has been stated in clear, simple English. Sure.
Wrath of Orion
Member
Tue Sep 15 02:30:14
One more try to prove you're not as retarded as I think you are. What is my position in this thread?
habebe
Member
Tue Sep 15 02:30:23
Please summarize your point and support that with your previous statements then.

Or are we back to your normal posting methids of beating around the bush and denial?
habebe
Member
Tue Sep 15 02:32:16
You have made several arguments/points in this thread. I clearly pointed out with cites what I was referencing.

Iys not my fault you lack basic reading and comprehension skills.
Wrath of Orion
Member
Tue Sep 15 02:32:44
I will have no problem doing that - once you state what my position in this thread it. One sentence will do.

Because, as evidenced by your previous posts, I fully believe you have no fucking clue whatsoever. So prove me wrong.
Wrath of Orion
Member
Tue Sep 15 02:33:35
I have made a number of minor points relating to things you posted/brought up along the way. However, I still have one overall point in this thread that I have not deviated from.
habebe
Member
Tue Sep 15 02:38:13
Ok but, your questioning me about what I think argument is came right after I stated how retarded that claim was.

I have stated what I was referencing when I said that.

Im done trying to explain it to you over and over again. You clearly need more help than I can offer.
Wrath of Orion
Member
Tue Sep 15 02:41:59
You don't need to explain anything to me. You're dodging the question yet again by basically saying, "I already said it." But I've already told you that's comically wrong, so you know that. So yes, you're dodging the question. Because you have no fucking idea what my position actually is.

How can it be this hard for you? It's spelled out in the first post.
habebe
Member
Tue Sep 15 03:09:19
You truly are the dumbest person Ive ever talked to.

sigh...Lets try this again.

So when I said your argument was retarded, I was referencing not your " overall argument" but a specific point

Which is sort of two part.

1. Your claim that you cant judge something without seeing it in its entirety. Which while alone is not that bad, but wrong. You can clearly watch 15 minutes of Friday the 13th and determine its a horror film. That is notnthe same as taking somethingnout of context.

2. Is related and here comes the retarded part. You psuedo judge that " you doubt that scene is in the movie"

And then refuse to accept evidence that it is indeed in the movie. Which is important because you will make these pseudo judgments doubting And such that the film is

But then when displayed proof or evidence that the movie is borderline kiddie porn, you ignore it.

Do you understand why it is retarded to state " Its probably not that bad" and yet refuse to accept evidence of how bad it is?

Thats like me saying " The earth is probably flat because I never seen evidence the contrary, but I also refuse to note any evidence"

habebe
Member
Tue Sep 15 03:11:15
"Which is important because you will make these pseudo judgments doubting And such that the film is * borderline kiddie porn*"

Wrath of Orion
Member
Tue Sep 15 03:26:14
Remember when I said you mischaracterized my position? You're still doing it. You still have no idea what I was saying. You just don't get it.

I get what you're saying - I always have. It's just that what you're saying is a mischaracterization of my position. You don't get the overall point or even the minor point that referencing.

So I was correct. You really do have no idea at all. Thanks.
Wrath of Orion
Member
Tue Sep 15 03:26:44
that *you're referencing
habebe
Member
Tue Sep 15 03:30:20
Now who is dodging?

What specifically did I mischaracterize?
Wrath of Orion
Member
Tue Sep 15 03:44:51
Pretty much everything.

"Your claim that you cant judge something without seeing it in its entirety."

Nope. While I'm sure you think this is what I meant, it's not what I said. My first post lays out my position very clearly. Now while I'm sure you're going to point to the post where I used the word "judge," that was clearly in reference to my initial point. If you're too stupid to get that, that's on you.

"You can clearly watch 15 minutes of Friday the 13th and determine its a horror film."

I never claimed you couldn't (though it would probably depend on which 15 minutes you're talking about, but I'll take your point as I'm sure you meant it).

"That is notnthe same as taking somethingnout of context."

You're correct, it's not the same thing as taking something out of context. The context of it being a horror film is supplied by the appropriate 15 minute clip (presumably of slasher footage, again taking your point as I assume you meant it).

You've again misunderstood and mischaracterized my point of this being a retarded comparison to a movie that most assuredly gets its point across through subtext laced through the entire film.

"You psuedo judge that 'you doubt that scene is in the movie'"

I've already addressed this point. It was the claim of nudity, not the scene, to which I was referring. And as I also said, if you want to claim you weren't suggesting there was actually nudity there, that's fine. But I also explained how it is very easy to see how someone might think you were claiming nudity there since you had already made a nudity claim earlier in the thread. A point you were again wrong on.

And as I already explained, yet again, you're off the fucking deep end on some of this shit (like claiming the intention of the film is to normalize pedophilia), so I was not willing to trust your judgement on anything related to the film. However, I did go find my own link which specifically states there is no nudity. So your links were not needed. And I knew they wouldn't be needed, because I know parental guides like that exist and contain plenty of details.

"Do you understand why it is retarded to state ' Its probably not that bad'"

Again mischaracterizing my position. I never said anything like that.

I could go on and on, but why bother? My current point is clear.
habebe
Member
Tue Sep 15 04:02:27
"Now while I'm sure you're going to point to the post where I used the word "judge," that was clearly in reference to my initial point. "

No, Im going by this post.

" I certainly wouldn't be making claims it's attempting to normalize pedophilia without actually watching the entire film"

Its not just the scenes in the film but the attitude about the film by certain media outlets.

"yet again, you're off the fucking deep end on some of this shit (like claiming the intention of the film is to normalize pedophilia"

Perhaps I did not explain my reasoning on this well enough.

The fact that they had these scenes that were not necessary over and over again inclusing the close ups etc.

coupled with the these extremist views from select outlets that this is just right wing prude thinking to say these scenes are by there nature innapropriate is why I take this position.

As shoeonhead stated " its like making a movie about where you just go around murdering people and then at the end go " murder bad"



""Do you understand why it is retarded to state ' Its probably not that bad'"

Again mischaracterizing my position. I never said anything like that."

"Films have been criticizing things by showing them and making audiences uncomfortable for decades upon decades. That's certainly not anything new.

But again, not having watched it, I can't really judge.

Also, I question whether this...

"there is no need for scenes of 11 year olds taking pictures of there nude vagina"

...is actually shown in the film."

That entire post can be summed up as just that.

You can claim otherwise all you want but its pretty clear to see your alluding that while you won't make a clear stance on the film since you havnt watched it you doubt its as bad as the claims.
habebe
Member
Tue Sep 15 04:03:22
Also you lefy out theninportant part of that quote. The part about you refusing to look at the evidence.
Wrath of Orion
Member
Tue Sep 15 04:10:38
Right, so you've seen clips from the film and read some reactions and you're convinced it's an attempt to normalize pedophilia... Fuck you, you're a worthless idiot. Period.

"That entire post can be summed up as just that."

Wrong. Again, you're obviously too stupid to ever get this. That post responds to YOUR OWN FUCKING QUESTION...

"What is the point of such scenes?"

That is the only reason I brought it up - to answer your own goddamn retarded question with one possibility. Films have been doing that pretty much since they've been in existence. Is that what this one is doing? I have no idea, but it's one possibility that answers your question. But I can't judge that because it would take watching the entire film to know that since it would be based on subtext...

And the nudity bit has already been addressed.

Jesus fucking Christ. Seriously... Your IQ must be just above the official cutoff for mental handicap. Please, just stop embarrassing yourself.
Wrath of Orion
Member
Tue Sep 15 04:11:52
"Also you lefy out theninportant part of that quote. The part about you refusing to look at the evidence."

Already addressed it. Found my own link proving you wrong about nudity.
Habebe
Member
Tue Sep 15 04:30:22
For someone who won't judge you spend alot of time defending attacks on a pedo movie....

I have no interest in arguing with retarded pedophiles such as yourself.
Wrath of Orion
Member
Tue Sep 15 04:32:13
lol, buh bye.
Rugian
Member
Tue Sep 15 05:35:20
Jesus. All of you people who used to mock Hot Rod for being a pedo...I see now that you were simply engaging in projection.
habebe
Member
Tue Sep 15 05:53:24
Rugian, I really didnt think that the leftists on these boards would be lining up to defend pedo bait.

I mean initially I thought the premise/ poster spinded shady, but that it was supposed to be a critique of sexual exploitation.

But after seeing the clips and descriptions, its clearly pedo bait/ border line kiddy porn.

How is this a political issue? sjws gone crazy is all I can figure.
Wrath of Orion
Member
Tue Sep 15 10:16:19
I believe there's only one poster in this thread with repeated links to what they call kiddie porn, and it's certainly not me or any of the "leftists."
Nimatzo
iChihuaha
Tue Sep 15 11:11:27
I have not see this movie and I will not, but there have been plenty of movies like this. Two that remember to this day is Kids by Larry David Clark. The movie contains underaged fucking and rape, drug use and whatever have you. Portraying people 12-15 years old. All the actors are young and without any previous acting experience. The film is shot almost like a documentary and because no one is an actor it feels very visceral and real. Shocking even back in the 90's.

There was some controversy over this even back then, but of course these things all pale to the shitstorm that starts for similar or even tamer movies today.
Nimatzo
iChihuaha
Tue Sep 15 11:11:56
The other one was Ken park, also by Larry Clark.
Paramount
Member
Tue Sep 15 11:18:03
I have seen Ken Park. That movie was sick.

I remember there was a young kid, who gave an older woman (maybe his teacher, mom, or friends mom, I don’t remember) oral sex. They actually filmed it as he was licking her vagina.
habebe
Member
Tue Sep 15 12:46:04
"I believe there's only one poster in this thread with repeated links to what they call kiddie porn, and it's certainly not me or any of the "leftists"

Says the pedophile that who spent hours defending said kiddie porn. I only posted said link after your doubting the validity. and of course as you said " you did your own research"
Wrath of Orion
Member
Tue Sep 15 12:56:49
You're wrong just as often as the original Retard Rod, which is to say pretty much all the time.

I have not defended the movie. In fact, I find the concept of it distasteful and have refused to follow any links to clips from it. All I have done is shown your inane rantings to be retarded and idiotic. When asked BY YOU why it may have been created the way it was, I responded with one possibility that makes far more logical sense than your idiotic notion of "trying to normalize pedophilia."

My "research" was to go to imdb and find the parental guide, which I posted to refute your claim of nudity in the movie.

And, of course, you made the thread. And only you have posted links to what you call kiddie porn. Not only did you post them, but you encouraged others to view them.

I'm quite certain it's obvious you are the one with the issue here.
habebe
Member
Tue Sep 15 12:59:29
Ok pedo woo.
Wrath of Orion
Member
Tue Sep 15 13:00:56
You've embarrassed yourself enough, I think. Run along and pretend this thread never happened.
habebe
Member
Tue Sep 15 13:02:46
It's sad your not embarrassed abput your pedophilia, you should be.
Wrath of Orion
Member
Tue Sep 15 13:04:32
I don't post or follow links to what you call kiddie porn. If it is actually determined to be kiddie porn, which you seem to think it will be, the investigators will not come knocking on my door for posting or following your links. Obviously they may be knocking on yours. Will they also find those guns a convicted felon is not supposed to have?
habebe
Member
Tue Sep 15 13:06:44
Dont like tge name pedo woo? dimt doend hours defending the creation of pedo bait.
Wrath of Orion
Member
Tue Sep 15 13:08:48
Names on this board do not bother me. Every time you use it I'll be reminded of the absolute thrashing you got in this thread and how you have flailed about trying to make some kind of coherent argument. And, sadly, how you posted links to what you call kiddie porn and encouraged others to view it.
Wrath of Orion
Member
Tue Sep 15 13:09:40
But you're right, you should probably work hard to fill up this thread and let it fall off the board. If you're lucky, most of the people will probably forget your embarrassing showing here within a week or so.
habebe
Member
Tue Sep 15 13:10:40
This really has gotten under your skin, huh?

we can always make a 2nd thread exposing your support of pedo bait.
Wrath of Orion
Member
Tue Sep 15 13:16:11
Under my skin? Nah. I find it mildly amusing to take apart your arguments piece by piece and make you look like an idiot. It passes time while I work on things like emails or read articles.

You can decide whether or not you feel another thread is needed. I have a feeling that, considering I'm pretty sure you know how badly you messed up here, you'll decide another is not needed.
habebe
Member
Tue Sep 15 13:24:25
So criticizing pedo bait makes me look like an idiot.

Do you know what defending and supporting pedo bait makes you look like?
Forwyn
Member
Tue Sep 15 21:48:20
WoO and a merchant join together to defend the artistry of prepubescent girls twerking and rebelling against muh patriarchy

Fucking lol
Rugian
Member
Tue Sep 15 21:50:48
I'm going to go ahead and thank habebe for putting up with WoO's bullshit for this long. If I *knew* I was in the presence of a pedo advocate, I'd have left the chat a long time before now.

WoO, maybe Cuties isn't the hill you want to die on. Just saying.
show deleted posts
Bookmark and Share