Welcome to the Utopia Forums! Register a new account
The current time is Thu Apr 25 17:07:48 2024

Utopia Talk / Politics / Should women be allowed to vote?
Habebe
Member
Sun Oct 02 19:37:28
On say child support? Should they get a say?

Or military matters?

What if men want to rape boys?

City projects that involve plumbing?


If these things don't generally involve them, why should theyhave a say?
Forwyn
Member
Sun Oct 02 19:54:29
Democratic Republicanism already has an issue with short-term promises; whereas a king has a domain to expand and cultivate for his offspring and legacy, representatives serve very short terms based on the short-term whims of voters, and spent more than three-quarters of their time in office fundraising for the party.

The woman vote just exacerbates that. Even more short-term in their thinking as an aggregate, and more susceptible to social engineering (see any street interview where a woman is introduced to a real Tate/Peterson quote and then does a 180° when told who said it) due to their enhanced agreeableness. It's no wonder that women fall for tranny propaganda as a relief for their depression and anxiety at much higher rates.

I get where you were going with this. But hey, good vent tangent on your uterus/abortion thread.

<3 you CC, no aggregate is universal
Habebe
Member
Sun Oct 02 19:59:25
I don't mind vents.
murder
Member
Sun Oct 02 21:31:33

"Should women be allowed to vote?"

Yes ... but not men.

murder
Member
Sun Oct 02 21:35:13

"see any street interview where a woman is introduced to a real Tate/Peterson quote and then does a 180° when told who said it"

You think women on the street know who the fuck either of those two are?

McKobb
Member
Sun Oct 02 22:49:39
Did you get a look at them vents?
Forwyn
Member
Sun Oct 02 23:01:54
"You think women on the street know who the fuck either of those two are?"

Only to the extent they read a couple paragraphs from Vice/Daily Kos articles. They have no idea what the content is, but they can tell you they hate the individuals, because they've been told to do so. And because their agreeableness is much higher, and they perceive public opinion to lean in a certain direction (by design), they do so.
kargen
Member
Sun Oct 02 23:12:18
I suppose women can go ahead and vote. Men (or I guess to be PC sperm donors) should be able to terminate any financial responsibilities within one year of finding out they are the sperm donor. And the birthing persons shouldn't have a say in that issue as they lack the parts to produce sperm.
Habebe
Member
Mon Oct 03 00:12:33
To be fair I've only ever heard of Tate after he Got "cancelled".

I've liked Peterson for a while.
murder
Member
Mon Oct 03 00:24:21

"Only to the extent they read a couple paragraphs from Vice/Daily Kos articles. They have no idea what the content is, but they can tell you they hate the individuals, because they've been told to do so."

Only a tiny fraction of the population has ever heard of either of them.

Im better then you
2012 UP Football Champ
Mon Oct 03 00:48:13
-habebe is only suggesting the OP cause he wants poll workers to check his junk before voting.
Habebe
Member
Mon Oct 03 01:43:27
Ibty- That's only half true, mostly true. Ok, its spot on.
patom
Member
Mon Oct 03 06:20:37
Tate/Peterson?
I like them both. Sharon Tate was kind of hot. Oscar Peterson was one hell of a piano player.
patom
Member
Mon Oct 03 06:27:16
Why shouldn't women be allowed to vote on plumbing issues? Hell look at all the men who consult Trump for all their medical, financial, military, voting, etc. decisions.
Cherub Cow
Member
Mon Oct 03 07:03:30
"Should women be allowed to vote?"

No.
The experiment has failed.

The total state discovered who it needs to social engineer to gain control: those possessing slave morality.
Does every member of a particular demographic possess slave morality? No. But some demographics are more likely to possess it; some demographics are more willing to accept a total state, surrendering the sovereignty of their very people on the behalf of tyrants and parasites.

How do we stop the total state from using this manipulation?

"Service guarantees citizenship."
No equity.
No reduced standards.
No Agenda 2030 "pay gap" manipulations.
No imposters in positions of power.

"Violence, naked force, has settled more issues in history than has any other factor, and the contrary opinion is wishful thinking at its worst. Breeds that forget this basic truth have always paid for it with their lives and their freedoms."

Abolishing the 19th amendment would be a start, but large states need to be sub-divided into additional Electoral Colleges (e.g., sub-divide California into its own College). All votes should be in-person and on paper — fully audit-traceable in public archives. Banks should be beholden to citizens, not the managerial state. Anyone who participates in this process must be capable of committing ultraviolence on behalf of society. This would omit many women but also many of society's male nihilists — a net positive. The society's future would be determined by those who would not be ruled — which may therefore develop more strong women.

No one should have power over society without having accepted personal responsibility for the same.
LazyCommunist
Member
Mon Oct 03 07:06:02
Democracy is for weaklings. Strong nations have strong leaders, like Russia has Putin.
murder
Member
Mon Oct 03 07:28:11

"Should women have a say in society?"

"No." -- Cherub Cow

Followed by opinions on everything.



Forwyn
Member
Mon Oct 03 07:30:17
"The society's future would be determined by those who would not be ruled"

Based
Habebe
Member
Mon Oct 03 07:32:46
"No one should have power over society without having accepted personal responsibility for the same."

Re read that part.

Lazy, We had Arnold, one of the strongest leaders of all time.
Forwyn
Member
Mon Oct 03 07:36:17
"Only a tiny fraction of the population has ever heard of either of them."

Again, the point isn't that you have to be aware of certain podcasters. I don't listen to either unless they happen to pop up in my feed.

The point is a large number of people having their opinions on these individuals without hearing of either of them, or hearing anything they say.

Primarily women, because they are more susceptible to mass media manipulation, especially as it's progressed to short form, i.e. NowThis videos with emotional music and DNC talking points delivered line by line. Even Robert Reich can keep the US attention span for 60 seconds to deliver some skewed data.
Nimatzo
iChihuaha
Mon Oct 03 10:07:27
"Should women be allowed to vote?"

The answer is mostly no.
Cherub Cow
Member
Mon Oct 03 20:44:10
Notice how murder had to change the terms for this "win":

-=-
murder:
"Should women have a say in society?"
"No." -- Cherub Cow
Followed by opinions on everything.
-=-

He even deliberately misquoted the question in order to disguise his ever-present dishonesty (i.e., he changed, "Should women be allowed to vote?", to, "Should women [have a say in society?]")

Murder is the type of male nihilist who should not be allowed to vote. He has no virtues, his bloodline is weak, and history will forget him.
Dukhat
Member
Mon Oct 03 22:46:12
More and more people falling off the deep end. Pathetic.
murder
Member
Mon Oct 03 23:15:27

"Notice how murder had to change the terms for this "win""

WTF do you think the right to vote is?


"He even deliberately misquoted the question ..."

Yeah I think every caught that. Not just you.


"Murder is the type of male nihilist who should not be allowed to vote. He has no virtues, his bloodline is weak, and history will forget him."

History is forgetting everybody.

Paramount
Member
Tue Oct 04 01:08:25
”Nimatzo
iChihuaha Mon Oct 03 10:07:27
"Should women be allowed to vote?"

The answer is mostly no.”



Nimatzo is a refugee from a Islamic State in the Middle East.
murder
Member
Tue Oct 04 01:35:57

Sometimes I'm sure that some posters are trolling, but then something makes me wonder.

Nimatzo
iChihuaha
Tue Oct 04 03:52:31
Paramount is a nazi vegan.
Nimatzo
iChihuaha
Tue Oct 04 07:08:55
It didn’t need to be this way, but men for various reasons have capitulated in big enough number into idiotic narratives where feminity is inherently virtuous AKA ”future is female”. This elevating historically disenfranchised into the heroes and saviours of the future, is unstable because it is inherently apocalyptic and revolutionary. What is the revolutionary mindset if not the worst aspects of the free market (boom and bust cycles) applied to the administration of society.

This was expected when the discourse became one of largely pitting men against women, instead of aspirations to synthesize some new mode, grounded in enlightement ideals and our shared biological (physical) reality. You retards went full post modern and now we have women with penises and men who give birth. Revolutions have reactions and the reaction is that the upgrade is deemed to be so unstable and have so many critical unknowns that people are reverting back to the last stable version.
Paramount
Member
Tue Oct 04 07:25:56
There are no women with penises. If you have a penis you are a male.
McKobb
Member
Tue Oct 04 07:40:34
what reaction are you expecting to get to these posts here?
murder
Member
Tue Oct 04 07:53:32

Nimatzo: There's no amount of trying to sound enlightened that can cover up a preference for the backward ass past of men dominating women.

I had wondered why you were silent on the protests in Iran, but I guess I can quit wondering now.

Dukhat
Member
Tue Oct 04 08:21:48
I mean, just check his post history. He's only progressive as long as women "know their place."
Nimatzo
iChihuaha
Tue Oct 04 08:32:13
Paramount, with that comment, there is hope for you. You need to put together all these bits and pieces and see what the underlying problems are.

Random MP/V/S or SD voter, who is more likely to agree that men can give birth? Exactly. It's a disagreement about fundamental reality that is upstream of how to make sense of reality. You should not be trolling me, you should be having an existential/ideological crises. You can keep reading because the next paragraph is also tale of caution.

"Shoot me nigga guy"
Mother fucker, have I not told you that I think you should be thrown into a volcano? Why are you wondering things and stuff about me? Give that space that I am currently living rent free in to the homeless!

What is happening in Iran in 2022 is the latest item in the news cycle to preform and virtue signal about and here is the important part: For you, not for me.
patom
Member
Tue Oct 04 10:42:58
Paramount is being honest in his belief that his brains are mounted between his legs.
murder
Member
Tue Oct 04 11:43:39

tree ---> fruit

fruit ---> tree

tree ---> fruit

fruit ---> tree


This can't end well.

Nimatzo
iChihuaha
Tue Oct 04 13:01:08
Poster 1: Hey murder, so and such...

Murder: Shoot me nigga!

Poster 2: Hey murder have you considered this and..

Murder: Shoot me nigga!

Poster 3: Hey murder I think this other stuff and....

Murder: Shoot me nigga!

And so on.
show deleted posts

Your Name:
Your Password:
Your Message:
Bookmark and Share