Utopia Talk / Politics / santos expelled

Sam Adams Member	Fri Dec 01 10:55:20 1 retard down. A few more to go. Rashida Talib up next.
murder Member	Fri Dec 01 13:37:47 He's a total piece of shit, but he wasn't even there for the insurrection. Of all the shameless, lying, cheating, stealing, self-dealing, treasonous, pieces of shit in the House ... they expelled the flaming homo. That's probably not a coincidence.
tumbleweed the wanderer	Fri Dec 01 13:44:37 he was also jew-ish apparently one of the 100s of people he stole from was a fellow R congressman & the guy's mother, email from Rep Max Miller: http://pbs...WcAEIFAw?format=jpg&name=large
murder Member	Fri Dec 01 13:52:34 Jew-ish Black-ish Fresh of the Boat He was a whole prime time lineup.
murder Member	Fri Dec 01 13:55:35 I'm slightly disappointed that Santos didn't show up for his last day in full Carmen Miranda costume. He should have gone out like the queen that he is.
Forwyn Member	Fri Dec 01 22:00:59 "A few more to go. Rashida Talib up next." Won't happen. Dems have their ducks in a row compared to fractured GOP. They expelled Santos with 100% of Dems and ~100 Reps. Just like McCarthy, who negotiated a budget deal with massive concessions for Dems, who turned on him salivating a week later and 100% went for him lol
tumbleweed the wanderer	Fri Dec 01 23:40:12 and Santos committed many crimes & corrupt acts and Tlaib hasn't at all?
Forwyn Member	Sat Dec 02 00:09:27 Yes, 100 Dems will vote to impeach Biden for emailing his son under a pseudonym to coordinate funds transfers from the lucrative jobs he secured via his VP position lol
tumbleweed the wanderer	Sat Dec 02 00:50:28 could i see one of these supposed emails?
Forwyn Member	Sat Dec 02 01:58:41 "could I see one of those confirmed, hidden emails?" lol retard
tumbleweed the wanderer	Sat Dec 02 02:16:29 yeah, what a crazy request If you can’t produce one then how do you know it exists... there are legit reasons he might not want to go as JoeBiden@whitehouse.gov (and why Hunter might get sent his schedule) whereas, I don’t see much reason for the National Archives to have ever been given the ‘pseudonym’ emails if their purpose was clandestine activity
Forwyn Member	Sat Dec 02 02:41:41 "If you can’t produce one then how do you know it exists..." Because the National Archives confirms they exist retard "whereas, I don’t see much reason for the National Archives to have ever been given the ‘pseudonym’ emails" They are not "given", they are automatically stored if you are a retard using a govt device to utilize your sock account, unless you take proactive steps to create an alternate server, as one of your favorites did
Rugian Member	Sat Dec 02 03:13:38 You have to love how tumbleweed is always willing to give Democrats the benefit of every doubt in the world, even in the face of a ton of evidence to the contrary. Compare that to his insane Trump series where he considers every single accusation made by a single unnamed source to be absolute proof of POTUS' guilt. What a hack.
murder Member	Sat Dec 02 06:46:07 "Just like McCarthy, who negotiated a budget deal with massive concessions for Dems, who turned on him salivating a week later and 100% went for him lol" Yeah, that's what he did.
tumbleweed the wanderer	Sat Dec 02 11:26:02 "because the National Archives confirms they exist" not ones "to coordinate funds transfers from the lucrative jobs" "Compare that to his insane Trump series where he considers every single accusation made by a single unnamed source to be absolute proof of POTUS' guilt" seriously? his obvious guilt on docs requires no anonymous sources, his guilt on trying to corruptly overturn election requires no anonymous sources (though isn't as blatantly obvious as docs case merely as the law not as straightforward... but both fucking obvious merely in considering if right or wrong)
Forwyn Member	Sat Dec 02 15:00:08 I'm sure he used a fake name to email his son about the weather. Again - you fucking retard lmfao
tumbleweed the wanderer	Sat Dec 02 16:18:15 so R's legit believe Biden takes bribes? (& that's since before election, as the laptop supposedly 'proved' it), yet Biden president for 3 years so far & R's couldn't even agree to vote on an inquiry requiring McCarthy doing on own (Pelosi did hold a vote)... & it's slowly progressing... McCarthy authorized Sept... not much evidence revealed as we continue into December whereas when Trump extorted Ukraine (on audio tape) inquiry also started Sept... w/ lots of televised testimony Oct & Nov detailing much beyond the 'perfect' phone call (Giuliani as point person on the ground pressuring Zelensky to do as Trump wanted, & various officials testifying unable to get explanation for hold on funds, etc) impeachment December (& despite political 'acquittal', there were enough R senators to convict saying 'yeah he did it, but don't think impeachable offense') somehow, i doubt the garbage committee genuinely believes what they put out (& they still hide any of the meat they supposedly have)
	show deleted posts

Your Name:
Your Password:
Your Message: