Utopia Talk / Politics / Diaper-Shitting Ped0 & Totalitarians #11

Cherub Cow Member	Tue Feb 13 22:24:01 Full title: "Dementia/Parkinson’s Diaper-Shitting Ped0phile and Totalitarian Ass-Clowns and Sycophants" the thread series!" Contained in this thread series is a road map elucidating the actions and imperatives of the rising global totalitarian state. See previous thread (#10) for synopsis of the global-totalitarian scheme: http://uto...hread=92265&time=1705466876145
Cherub Cow Member	Tue Feb 13 22:26:14 Here's Biden's retarded Super Bowl commercial where he tells the lie of "shrinkflation": [Official White House YouTube; February 11th, 2024] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GcVTzgZyGro In reality, Biden's market failures have caused razor-thin margins in businesses as they recover debts following his failed policies. The strategy in shaming companies is to get them to further sink-up these market losses to disguise the total state's failures.
Cherub Cow Member	Tue Feb 13 22:28:36 Aspects of the Climate Cult examined in the Climate Cult threads: http://uto...hread=92560&time=1707155561037
Cherub Cow Member	Tue Feb 13 23:50:37 Thread wherein we continue to examine whether Milei is a Based God or a Mossad plant: http://uto...hread=92533&time=1705951634901 A recent theory that is still being developed (but which preceded Milei's campaign as a suspicion) is that Milei is a Jewish relative of Netanyahu (possibly having the same name). Milei has hidden some of his family history, and supposedly both Milei and Netanyahu have the same origin name. Images show that Milei got a nose job, with his former nose definitely failing the physiognomy check. Autists are still looking into this ancestry, so I'm not especially convinced. But Milei also did the meme, appearing at the Wailing Wall, visibly crying and emotional, wearing a yarmulke, and 'spinning a fucking menorah' last week: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_NXzKJkwE6k I'm pretty sure I didn't take the free yarmulke when I visited the Wailing Wall years ago (they try to "recommend" that you wear one), but I can't locate images to confirm. The point being that politicians visiting the Wall and wearing the yarmulke has become a sad show of fealty. "The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves."
Cherub Cow Member	Sun Feb 18 08:29:13 Nimarata Randhawa issues a dangerous threat to the Republic: "There will be a female president of the United States, it will either be me, or it will be Kamala Harris." http://twitter.com/CensoredMen/status/1758990993959850178 This is the type of bullshit that is why Randhawa is clearly a Regime candidate. The DNC wants her because she's another war-monger who will accomplish the exact same thing as Bush/Cheney or Obama/Biden: global conflict, dysgenic warfare, and the death of the West. DeSantis made a serious tactical error by taking himself out of the running if for no other reason than that it puts Randhawa in a position which favors a55a55ination.
Cherub Cow Member	Mon Feb 19 04:29:29 Yeah, so, umm, anyways, about BRICS+ nationals being invited into Western governance very precariously: "Kelly Wong is the first noncitizen to be appointed to San Fransisco's Elections Commission Here is her victory speech:" (Video of Kelly Wong speaking Chinese in California chamber) http://twitter.com/EricAbbenante/status/1759413112430563344 "Wong talked about the importance of getting immigrants, especially those who can’t speak English, informed about the voting process" I wonder what the value of foreign nationals in Western governance is to a global totalitarian Regime intent on dissolving Western borders to manage the West as a fiefdom. Hmm.
Cherub Cow Member	Mon Feb 19 07:02:36 Regime propagandist John Oliver attempts to bribe a sitting U.S. Supreme Court Justice with a promise of $1 million per year and a mobile home in exchange for resigning from the Supreme Court so that a DNC puppet can be installed to carry out the totalitarian strategy: http://twitter.com/MikeSington/status/1759560551590760667 It's just a propaganda show, bro! He's just a comedian, bro! This is just a comment though, bro! It's just on HBO, bro! Don't take it seriously, bro! It's just a prank, bro!
Cherub Cow Member	Tue Feb 20 03:00:59 This meme has been circulating for a few days, but it's worth book-marking here: "New York is being ruled by evil people. "Get out of the state while you still can." (New York governor Kathy Hochul, who attained her power only because Andrew Cuomo was destroyed and who is a likely attendee of demonic and ritualistic upper-crust sex and sacrifice parties, assures people that the weaponization of New York law to go after Trump will similarly be used on any New Yorkers who get out of line) http://twitter.com/kylenabecker/status/1759731367389118478 You can see how equality under the law becomes a fiction when totalitarian psychopaths attain power. The real-estate "fraud" case against Trump was based in making common practices "illegal" (e.g., evaluating properties based on market value), which means that all of the real-estate people operating in New York can look at these "crimes", turn inward, and recognize their own "guilt" as well. That is, it is not that the act was illegal, it is that the state decided to prosecute a political enemy and "found" the crime (Cardinal Richelieu again). The actual standard of prosecution that was used will itself implicate thousands more, so the only barrier to prosecution is whether or not one is obedient to the state. This has two central effects within a totalitarian polarization strategy: 1) Those who fear the state will leave the state, leaving the state to become an even more Regime-controlled territory 2) Those who stay within the state will be forced to show even more deference to the state, increasing groupthink and obedience This is the same anarcho-tyranny formula I've mentioned before with regards to police and the self-fulfilling prophecy of "ACAB" (e.g., here "Mon Feb 12 21:30:51" http://utopiaforums.com/boardthread?id=politics&thread=92609&time=1707974695241 ). With police, the formula is that "[no good people would have stayed, so all those remaining must be bad]" — this logic creates its own outcome as people (incorrectly) believe the refrain to be true but then make it true via their reaction. So, at a reactive level, the self-fulfilling prophecy forces people into a false dichotomy where both options serve the totalitarian state: cede ground to the state by fleeing, or stay and comply. Outside the false dichotomy, other strategies exist: • immovable non-compliance (stay and undermine) • malicious compliance (prosecute the Regime with its own lawfare) There are tricks to this since it has been rightly pointed out that it is *leftism* that functions as an infiltrating force since leftism can degrade from within whereas the right would be enslaved if attempting the same infiltration. A fun example trick is Howard Roark dynamiting his own stolen building. But like, a metaphor.
Cherub Cow Member	Tue Feb 20 09:26:26 Regime propagandists Psaki and Pelosi float the conspiracy theory that Russia must have something on Trump for Trump to not want WWIII: http://twi...MKE/status/1759952375421264006
williamthebastard Member	Tue Feb 20 11:16:42 So UP has basically become a private online diary for some crazy cat lady having a breakdown? Oh, well
Cherub Cow Member	Tue Feb 20 22:51:23 [williamthecoward]: "some crazy cat lady having a breakdown?" Wow, "crazy cat lady"? "Breakdown"? Who's that? Tumbleweed? :p You should probably go talk to tumbleweed about his descent into madness — unless you're a coward and a partisan hack who will uncritically agree with the anti-Trump propaganda and the Regime's talking points in his threads and are instead driven here to heckle me with low-IQ garbage that doesn't address anything I've said because you're weak, a fraud, intellectually feeble, and lashing out at your own cognitive dissonance. To review, This bothers williamthecoward: • 11 threads about global totalitarianism that frequently fall to the bottom of the board before being refreshed This does not bother williamthecoward: • 43 threads about Trump that are constantly tended by a psychotic propaganda-gardener If williamthecoward can't face the reason for his cognitive dissonance, then he can pound sand and wait for his free helicopter ride. :) ... In other feeding-the-trolls news: Over the past two or three weeks, Mark Cuban has been engaging with various Twitter anons about why DEI is bad, and this has persisted even after Cuban revealed in a conference (last week or the week before) that he was only engaging in bad faith and wasn't actually interested in opposition arguments. This boiled over when people were pointing out that he was likely operating in bad faith because he's jewish, at which point he started re-Tweeting those comments apparently to show that Twitter is "anti-semitic". He has since started blocking the people who were maintaining good faith despite Cuban's deceptions. "The Rabbit Hole" ( @TheRabbitHole84 ), for instance, was being very tempered in his approach and was getting a top position in the replies, but yesterday he was blocked. Cuban was in the middle of denying that DEI has anything to do with Marxism and that CEOs such as himself are just capitalists. (Incidentally, almost two years ago I had a long argument with someone in a YT comment section having to explain to them that "stakeholder capitalism" is not actually capitalism, so this was like seeing Cuban getting to 2-year-old arguments.) On the off chance that Cuban actually views his engagements, I posted a graphic explaining the line from Marx to ESG/DEI to business adoption (tailored specifically at the end to the NBA's Mavericks team, which Cuban still partly owns). It was only viewed 15 times, so he likely didn't see it, but it's maybe a nice reference item for this thread: http://twitter.com/CherubCow/status/1759941022413439067
Cherub Cow Member	Wed Feb 21 00:31:15 MacIntyre has been posting bangers this week. Here's another: ABC News headline: "Letitia James says she's prepared to seize Trumo's buildings if he can't pay his $354M civil fraud fine" MacIntyre: "It’s a good time for people read up on the use of proscription in Ancient Rome "During the transition from republic to empire losing in politics meant being made a public enemy and losing all your property, often more" http://twitter.com/AuronMacintyre/status/1760147341552562497 (I.e., Augustus' proscription lists were kill lists.) This transparent use of lawfare along partisan lines by the left is a can of worms that the left either lacks the long-term thinking to realize or invites from their suicidal ideations. Creating an anarcho-tyranny and further polarizing the left can only mean a zero-sum political arena. Even murder, who is incredibly disingenuous, had a lucid moment and realized with the Colorado measures by Jewish Secretary of State Jena Griswold that removing Trump would set a precedent of states simply removing candidates that they don't like based on perceptions. But, evil monsters such as tumbleweed remained immune to this logic, even though the direct consequence of these kinds of political acts is going to be a55a55inations, violence, and civil conflict ( http://utopiaforums.com/boardthread?id=politics&thread=92462&time=1703995403018 ). So, again, 1) The left is either too stupid to know that this lawfare will be their own undoing, or 2) The left wants mass death This is why, again, I think the left has found themselves in a slavish death cult. The Celebration Parallax is merely how they pretend to not know that mass death is the direct consequence of their ideology. So, using the law to specifically and exclusively attack political enemies isn't happening, couldn't possibly be used against them, but civil war is good actually! And the worst part is that while they beg for death on behalf of their oligarchs, the oligarchs fanning the flames of this conflict are as immune and disinterested as the people betting on the "Deer Hunter" Russian Roulette game; they simply see this death as profitable and an expedient way to achieve their goals of re-formatting the world. If convincing leftists to destroy their political opponents and act as iconoclasts of the old order's statues achieves this, then they see this as a success. The downstream useful idiots are merely celebrating this death because they know, intuitively, that it is what their death cult demands.
Dukhat Member	Wed Feb 21 00:57:23 @WTB - It's because Nim is a spineless little shit. At least slow the pace of this fucking nonsense. It's all copy and paste bulshit.
Cherub Cow Member	Wed Feb 21 03:05:43 lol. The Projection Bot never fails to deliver: [Dukhat (Projection Bot)]: "At least slow the pace of this fucking nonsense. It's all copy and paste bulshit." That is, the pace of tumblefag's threads is far more frequent, and most of *my* content is written specifically for this thread (fresh material), whereas tumblefag, dukhat, ep, and wtb copy&paste garbage from Reddit, @Acyn, some flimsy "study", or ChatGPT and offer almost zero personal insights — just accepting party doctrine with no evaluation like good slaves. And this projection too: [Dukhat (Projection Bot)]: "It's because Nim is a spineless little shit." I've been calling the UP-left-fags cowards for a while, and the shoe fits dukhat and wtb too well, so now dukhat will pretend that it's somehow *Nim's* "spineless" interactions at play? No. Nim engages even with liars such as seb and jergul, giving them the benefit of the doubt and good faith even after years of sebgul lies. It is purely the cowardice of UP's leftists that causes my threads to give them cognitive dissonance — wherein they fail to engage and openly admit that they're too illiterate to even try ("[hur hur, tldr]"). Meanwhile, they remain too cowardly to look at tumblefag's descent into insanity. They simply see tumbletard's madness as a necessary function of the left's psychosis. They *want* some psychopath in a room somewhere cataloguing Trump's latest statements in bad faith, plotting violent action against him (e.g., williamthecoward talking about putting Trump in front of a firing squad http://uto...hread=92627&time=1708500096301 ). But as I've been saying for years now, you cowards alone will bear the cost of your obedience to the Regime through your own self-effected downfall. Your lies, projections, and deceptions are losing effect on the masses. The Regime over-played its hand in its post-2016 meltdown, and people know now what they could only be suspicious of before: that you were never Americans or Westerners at all — just enemies within its borders waiting for a moment when the tide had turned in your favor. There cannot be eulogies for such people who are incapable of bearing the cost of liberty much less of the simplest requisite of debates which sustain it; "There would have been a time for such a word" but no longer.
Nimatzo iChihuaha	Wed Feb 21 04:33:22 Absolutely. The distance between seb, jergul, wtb and dukhat is not even worth mentioning. One systematic problem shared between them is the unintended subject of the "study" on the dark triad being prevalent among right wingers that WTB spams all the time, but doesn't understand outside his bias confirming context. When everyone in a room more or less shares the same ideology and values, how does that effect the academic output, what are the consequences in social science specifically, where the subject are people and their social interactions and dynamics? 1. Most of the horrible stuff is in the other group 2. There just isn't as much horrible things in my group (because I don't see it as they are within accepted behavior) 3. The terrible stuff in my group, while I disagree with the tactics, I can empathize Ironically these are all dynamics explained by the same social scientists decades ago as they were busy deconstructing male norms or hetronormativity. Which brings us to the summary point 4: It's different when we do it! These are people without any principles, intellectual or moral, all of them have been caught lying, reconstructing past conversations, gas lighting, fumble some basic tenets of reading comprehension, never admit to errors etc. Several of them have, at best, a slippery understanding of the natural science, and even when they do, they will have no problem spreading ideological corruption instead of seeking the truth.
Cherub Cow Member	Wed Feb 21 06:11:00 [Nim]: "what are the consequences in social science specifically, where the subject are people and their social interactions and dynamics?" Yes and it's a very big oversight if that groupthinking team has difficulties establishing a theory of mind for their opposition. It adds onto that tendency where (current?) leftists tend not to even know the arguments of the opposition because they primarily interact with themselves, whereas the right will interact with the left and understand their positions. That left-wing groupthink leads to absurd errors like thinking that leftists cannot definitionally be authoritarian. And this isn't even arbitrary or merely a general statement where UP's leftists might be unaffected outliers. In the case of that dark triad "study", I've responded to wtb at least two times when he's posted that, but I doubt he's read my responses. He certainly would not have posted it again in good faith if he had read my first response; he would have at least addressed or dismissed my prior claims while reposting it. He didn't even do that. Tw does the same thing. It's basically just that asymmetric-trolling tactic where they congratulate themselves for getting more time than they think they're worth. [Nim]: "These are people without any principles, intellectual or moral, all of them have been caught lying, reconstructing past conversations, gas lighting, fumble some basic tenets of reading comprehension, never admit to errors etc." That's why I think a lot of the trust is gone for me (at the moment, anyways; I tend to reset after a while) and I've instead switched to trying to explain what the consequences of the left shutting down dialogue are. I think I've mentioned that movie "Live from Baghdad" (2002) before because it makes a good point despite being a movie self-congratulating CNN: (Dramatized CNN reporter talking to an Iraqi leader) "You just can’t walk away. Think about what’s at stake here, Naji. Think about what we’re talking about. People are gonna to die. People are going to die. And I’ll tell you exactly when they’re going to die. They’re going to die when the talking stops. So, we’ve got to keep talking. You and me got to keep talking. We got to keep talking until we’re old men. Okay? Because soon as the talking stops, we’re dead. Look, maybe I’ll never understand you. Maybe we’re not supposed to understand each other, but as long as we stay talking we stay alive. It’s worth an interview." Ironically, this scene was where a reporter was trying to get an interview with an Iraqi leader before U.S. military strikes so that the public could understand what the conflict was about and how it might be avoided. Similarly, you might see why they didn't want an interview with Putin ( http://uto...hread=92592&time=1708256615805 ); they want conflict to continue. The same logic is why the left has been propagandized to not speak with the right. It's the entire de-platform movement and the "Nazi"-slinging (e.g., "punch a Nazi") and thought-terminating clichés. It's designed for conflict, and I'm not sure the left realizes how ill-equipped they are for conflict or that they're being used to de-stabilize the West. [Nim]: "they will have no problem spreading ideological corruption instead of seeking the truth." Speaking of truth in terms of that dark triad "study", I mentioned to wtb after his most recent spam that it's pretty absurd on its face to think that the *right* can be implicated for mental health issues when the left freely admits its mental health issues but merely spins them as positives or quirky. Soon afterwar his latest posting, this Twitter person made a useful list of counter-studies which show things about the left that would not surprise anyone: http://twitter.com/thltd_/status/1759741293721248060 As a thread: http://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1759741293721248060.html?utm_campaign=topunroll • "Leftists are less attractive" • "Leftists are shorter and poorer" • "Leftists are weaker" • "Men with more masculine faces are more likely to be explicitly prejudiced (i.e. not Leftist)" • "Leftists are more mentally ill" • "Leftists are more unhappy" • "Leftists are more neurotic / emotionally unstable" • "Leftists have lower disgust sensitivity" • "Leftists don't believe that disgusting things are immoral" • "Leftists have incomplete moral foundations, are individually rather than group-focused" • "Simulating brain damage makes people Left-Wing" • "Leftists have smaller amygdalas (part of the brain responsible for processing threats, among other things) ... Smaller amygdala... correlates with increased mental illness" • "A damaged amygdala reduces threat-perception" • "People with amygdala damage experience sudden uncontrollable fear and panic when threatened (sound familiar?)" • Women with more feminine faces, lower testosterone, and higher estrogen have greater maternal tendencies (e.g. don't kill their babies, like Leftists)" • "Leftist women are less attractive" • "Leftist men have lower testosterone; giving moderate Leftists steroids makes them more Right-Wing" • "Men with higher testosterone lie less frequently" • "Men with higher testosterone are more likely to adopt heterodox positions, question consensus, impartially analyze information" • "Higher testosterone correlates with increased ingroup preference and outgroup discrimination" • "High testosterone produces prosocial behavior and heightened ingroup preference in the face of external threats, while low testosterone produces selfish behavior (again, does this sound familiar?)" • "Envy, selfishness, egalitarianism, and willingness to harm the innocent predict economic Leftism/redistribution" • "Narcissism and psychopathy predict anti-hierarchical aggression (i.e. Leftists wanting to destroy society)" • "Machiavellianism, narcissism, and psychopathy predict virtuous victimhood signaling" • "Virtue signalers are hypocrites" • "Psychopaths mimic prosocial personality traits to get women" • "Leftists are anti-White" • "Normal people are subconsciously more empathetic toward their own race" • "To save the lives of others, Leftists are willing to kill innocent Whites but not innocent Blacks" • "Leftists are more tolerant of anti-White than anti-Black discrimination" • "Being exposed to anti-White ideology makes Leftists more anti-White" From a purely strategic standpoint, you can see why people who fit these criteria would be more useful to a Regime that is attempting to de-stabilize a nation. The CIA specifically enabled groups such as this in foreign nations in order to effect Regime changes. If UP's leftists could realize both that these criteria make them useful and that they would not like the intended Regime change, then there could be a whole new dialogue.
Cherub Cow Member	Sat Feb 24 22:50:55 MSNBC host worried that "Christian Nationalists"* might actually believe that their rights come from a higher power and that therefore such rights cannot be dissolved by the state: [February 23rd, 2024] http://twi...SMC/status/1761015125673222572 The totalitarian state must do-away with such ideas because if your rights cannot be violated by the state then the state cannot be totalizing. *And as an aside, this term "Christian Nationalists" has been seeded as a Regime "Two Minutes Hate" phrase for over a year now. It's become another thought-terminating cliché for "Regime enemy". The Regime's goal is to make it seem as though Christians who want a return to the foundation values of these United States are actually a *danger* to these United States. It is, of course, the opposite, since even among the explicitly "Christian Nationalist" groups the worst-case scenario (by the left's perspective) is a codified preference/protection for Christianity as opposed to a suicidal non-preference against one's own history (suicidal in preferring/accepting instead, e.g., Judaism, Islam). The more reasonable arguments tend to be that an explicitly Christian state would be a possible remedy for this present issue of infiltrating anti-West global powers. There are obvious issues to this remedy, such as Christianity's own infiltration merely allowing these infiltrators another vector (as warned by Nietzsche in "The AntiChrist"), so I am not personally sold by the idea despite its medium-term utility. However, these Christians that the Regime tries to call "Christian Nationalists" but who do not call themselves this title (i.e., looking now at their actual arguments) tend to be recognizing a specific United States identity: that of the "White Anglo-Saxon Protestants" (WASPs). This stems from the correct recognition that the United States was formed with an understanding that a particular type of religious and ethnic people would be best fit for upholding the causes of liberty (the oft-cited 1798 John Adams quotation: "Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious People. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other"). So the so-called "Christian Nationalists" are merely seeking the proper sovereigns of society, attempting to answer the question, "Who is most fit to protect Western liberty?"). James Lindsay's cultists are being taught by Lindsay to oppose Christian Nationalism as a solution, but Lindsay's only valuable argument (and this, even, is between the lines, since he's incompetent on the issue) is that Christians who are swayed by the idea of a Christian nation should not allow themselves to be labeled as "Christian Nationalists" by the Regime, since this feeds into the Regime's thought-terminating cliché and allows all arguments behind the label to be disregarded by useful idiots who fall for the trick. This would be the Kierkegaard argument against negative labeling. Lindsay does not make this argument but instead stupidly dismisses the entire movement, accomplishing the Regime's bidding in a more circular way. A good example of the Regime's application of the trick is in another UP thread ("GOP: No trannies in girls bathrooms" http://utopiaforums.com/boardthread?id=politics&thread=92631&time=1708832821830 ). By getting useful idiots to see someone like this Pastor Bobby L. Leonard as representative of a Christian Nationalist movement, they will fear this type of person — who has no institutional power and has only an impotent political following — as a figurehead to call upon for why they (the useful idiots) must oppose liberty. This same strategy was used in the Regime's highlighting Todd Akin's line, "If it’s a legitimate rape, the female body has ways to try to shut the whole thing down" (NYT, 2012 https://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/21/us/politics/rep-todd-akin-legitimate-rape-statement-and-reaction.html ). The short version of the Regime's deception tactic being: 1) Identify the arguments that your opposition could use to successfully counter your destruction of society (e.g., arguments for liberty, for sovereignty, for negative rights). 2) Find a "low-class" figurehead who poorly represents those values (e.g., Akin, Leonard, Trump). 3) Code those values as "belonging" to that figurehead/group by labeling those as "his" or of a named movement (e.g., "Trump", "Trumpism", "MAGA movement", "Christian Nationalism", "white supremacy"). Step 3 forms a fallacy of association between these opposition arguments and thought-terminating clichés (e.g., "liberty" is associated with "Trumpism"): • To the Regime's especially low-IQ useful idiots, they do not even hear the opposition arguments but instead simply react negatively to hearing the cliché (e.g., "[Anything called 'Trumpism' is bad, end of story.]"). • To those with only slightly greater IQ (e.g., mid-wits), the false association will *also* make them believe that the idea given the cliché is "bad" (e.g., they will believe, "[Liberty is bad.]"). • When given university backing, this mid-wit thought process is simply elevated with language via inter-connected clichés to obscure this simple coding and lend it false legitimacy (e.g., "[Liberty is bad because of systemic structures of inequity and histories of white supremacy and Christian Nationalism that disadvantage minority communities of color in the Global South.]") The entire venture is to appeal to mob rule since the mob is often incapable of any depth of thinking. The mob lines were able to thrive on pre-Musk Twitter due to character limits which limit depth, whereas longer examinations cause people to think of the consequences of their ideology. The leftist ideology of resentment works effectively on this mob process, since resentment simply wishes to discharge its ill will on its betters with no thought of the future — like the scorpion on the frog's back. So, if the low-IQ left can believe that "[Those pesky, low-class Christians]" believe that natural rights are inviolable and derived from a Creator, then those natural rights must be "bad" and the Totalitarian State instead must be given this express power, with all rights coming from the Totalitarian State.
Cherub Cow Member	Mon Feb 26 02:26:39 Pretty much all of the right-wing indy and semi-indy outlets are talking about Google's "Gemini" A.I. program being overtly anti-White, and what's kind of sad is that Radio Rwanda is so "normal" now that this almost just registers as another obligatory data point (i.e., frogs are boiling): http://twitter.com/SaysSimonson/status/1761919253433729098 The simple truth is that there is a concerted effort to effect mass-violence against White people as a strategy of genocide and disempowerment in Western nations and that this is being led by a coalition of asset managers under the United Nations so that the new oligarchs can control a global post-economic society of enslavement, but this is rarely stated outright. And this is also an opportunity to show how identical coverage of various cultural issues has become. This is similar to a phenomenon where people erroneously believe that they have discovered some piece of media from the past like an archeologists with a divine magnifying glass... only to find that everyone is talking about the same thing because that media is mass-produced within a cultivated system (e.g., thinking that seeing "The Mod Squad" (1999) is a revelation rather than just a product of HBO placing it on their featured page). This gets painfully redundant, so I've gone through these and put any distinct information underneath each. This does not include people who were (so-far) largely silent on the issue, such as James Lindsay, Candace Owens, or the largely discredited "Intellectual Dark Web" (Weinstein brothers, Sam Harris, etc.). • Crowder (at about 53:30) [February 22nd, 2024] http://rumble.com/v4f0zdt--live-ai-confirms-google-hates-white-people-louder-with-crowder.html ("It clearly hates White people"; also includes Sundar Pichai's role (i.e., not just one programmer (Jack Krawczyk) as some other pundits suggest); Crowder's team does generate their own images; does also show that the idea of "German" can be mixed-race but the idea of "Congolese" can only be black (i.e., the recognition that multi-culturalism is only forced on White societies); does point out that this is social-engineering; talks about the left-wing media monopoly and how the right needs to de-couple) • Mark Dice [February 22nd, 2024] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JcUSavC7-Kw (Points out that this is a trend of Anti-Whiteism that he has covered before; Dice is not shy about naming the J's, though he keeps this subtle in his videos and refers people to his books) • Lotus Eaters [February 22nd, 2024] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sX8oCR7_ll4 (They generate more nationalities than other sources; show some tricks to fool Gemini into showing White people in an effort to avoid making black people look bad; Harry (at 20:00) brings up Great Replacement and manipulations of representation for this goal; show that this connects back to "Google's Ideological Echo Chamber" (2017 issue http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google%27s_Ideological_Echo_Chamber ); connect this to Google's DEI hiring policy and culture; points out that it's not just Google's A.I. — it is a known issue with image searches and regular searches; "It only goes one way" (repressive tolerance); a wider issue of reflecting "the culture of the West") • Liberal Hivemind [February 23rd, 2024] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d5He01bcbCE ("It only goes one direction" (repressive tolerance) but immediately makes the boomer statement of "[the left are the *real* racists]"; "erasure of Whiteness" (he refuses to recognize that it's literally "White people" not "Whiteness"); talks about left-wing narrative control) • Danny Polishchuk [February 23rd, 2024] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2aDGoQ9-PLg (Comedy skit; poses as a White Google employee and jokes about how White people have to be suicidal or they'll get fired; makes the false conclusion that this stops if Biden is elected (interesting deception, since this accelerates to its final conclusion if Biden is re-elected; difficult to tell if that was a joke in keeping with the skit's wider joke or a true belief outside of the joke)) And even Conservative Inc. got into it: • Gutfeld [February 23rd, 2024] http://youtu.be/4wJmLEXP33E?si=CNoxZ3lzS7r_Bf5a&t=495 (Points out that this is due to Jack Krawczyk, that this reflects the programmer, and that Google holds major narrative power; one of the guests, Julie Banderas, *takes* (legitimizes) the Regime's repressive-tolerance talking points about how White people shouldn't get to talk about racism; Gutfeld seems to (erroneously) believe that it's "just one person" (Krawczyk), which fails to understand how these bureaucracies function; Fox/Gutfeld is basically critiquing while staying in the Regime narrative on this one) • Ben Shapiro (DailyWire) [February 22nd, 2024] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KwfHPw3rUGs (In his deceptive fashion, he simply points out that it's adding diversity but avoids the implications of its Anti-White rhetoric despite the video having "Anti-White" in the title. This is unsurprising because Shapiro recently doubled down on his 2017 belief that he "[doesn't care] about the so-called "browning of America."" (2017 Tweet: http://twitter.com/benshapiro/status/875730927002963968 ) • Brett Cooper (DailyWire) [February 23rd, 2024] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4aEbZ78VeaY (Talks about historical accuracy being subverted; also points out that Gemini protects the NAMBLA crowd; does at least point out that it's a one-way street (i.e., repressive tolerance)) • Matt Walsh (DailyWire) [February 23rd, 2024] htts://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RGOtLLEVKEM (Actually gives novel information and editorial insight; explains that on top of the anti-White bias, the program injects additional search terms to force diversity; talks about how this is social-engineering by moral busybodies such as Google's Jack Krawczyk; calls out the Great Replacement, though subtly) • TimCast [February 24th, 2024] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EiaLacM-rAI (Completely side-tracks talking about left-wing media giving false and incomplete information; Tim Pool has a huge blindspot for the Great Replacement and always avoids the issue) 1) On the one hand, you can see how conservative media is attempting the left's same tactic, which is to flood the zone so that no matter who you follow you still see the same 24-hour-news-cycle events. This allows the right to set narratives whereas previously the yellow-journalism of the left had a near-total monopoly on narrative (pre-Internet punditry). The risk is that this devolves into the left's homogenized messaging and falsification of "grassroots" conclusions (i.e., the risk is that it all just becomes the narrative that the Regime prefers — whether left or right). 2) On the other hand, you can see that some conservative media only cover it dutifully (very few conclusions, connections, or necessary editorializing), and there is a mix of those attempting to red-pill and those attempting to gate-keep. Fox News, for instance, attempts to gate-keep (i.e., "[Look no further, boomers]"), Shapiro deceives by omission (i.e., "[What a strange thing the left is doing; oh well, give Israel more money]"), Walsh leaves the door open (i.e., "[This is related to other issues]"), Cooper offers nothing (i.e., dutifully covers to waste time — manipulating the attention economy and preventing deeper knowledge), and only Dice and Lotus Eaters explicitly say what is going on (albeit this list is not the entire right-wing network). In other words, we see a line (from) controlled opposition (to) functional conclusions which moves like this (arrows added for major breaks): (Total cowardice / Regime Controlled) ⬇️ • Gutfeld (FoxNews) — outright supports Regime narratives • Ben Shapiro (DailyWire) — evades conclusions; wastes time • Brett Cooper (DailyWire) — zero insight; wastes time • TimCast — deflection/avoidance • Liberal Hivemind — cowardice/avoidance ⬇️ • Matt Walsh (DailyWire) — some insight, less avoidance • Crowder — some insight, some acceptance, but remains in Overton Window • Danny Polishchuk — some insight, some deception ⬇️ • Mark Dice — insight, coded language, referral to true insight to maintain platform (channel monetized) • Lotus Eaters — risky insight (channel is already demonetized), less coded language, outright recognition without referral to other works ⬇️ (Aware of the scheme, the dialectic, and the goals) This can similarly be mapped to a hierarchy of Regime media to independent media, e.g., • Legacy Media — Regime controlled boomer-truths (e.g., Fox News, CNN, MSNBC, Facebook) ⬇️ • New (but still false/cowardly) Media — Still in the Regime's prestige network, still caters to the left, controlled opposition disguised as independence (e.g., DailyWire, The Post Millennial, TimCast, Liberal Hivemind) ⬇️ • Informed Media — Outside the prestige network, sensitive to and critical of controlled opposition, often demonetized or uses heavily coded language to evade censorship, often too niche to be effective (e.g., Lotus Eaters, Dice, Parvini, MacIntyre, Millerman, Nuclear Grifter, Leather Apron Club) ⬇️ • Completely Silenced Media — Frens on burner accounts, Odyssey channels that get shadow-banned, fed-posting without feds, bit-chute documentaries (e.g., Adam Green, Thomas Sewell, Europa the Last Battle) And this also maps onto errors that we still see leftists in this forum make. That is, UP's low-information leftists still mistake the entirety of the right as being "Fox News" or "Facebook meme" products (a common refrain of Dukhat, williamthecoward, and tumbleweed) whereas they do not comprehend the rest of the right's Overton Window. Now, per item "1)" (above), an informed leftist could use my argument here to claim that the right suffers from the left's same psychosis network (the left's network being something I cover here under "As a quick side note" https://cherubcow.substack.com/p/more-of-the-ray-epps-saga ), my argument being that the Psychosis Accounts are merely Astro-Turfed with the Regime's identical messaging. But, this simply is not the case with the right. This is because the Regime's Psychosis Network is *funded* explicitly by the Regime (i.e., their messages are approved and are identical from MSNBC all the way to Vaush, JoJoFromJerz, and Acyn and many of these Psychosis Accounts were even invited to the White House), whereas the right's Overton Window is contained and not funded. You can even see how quickly this funding drops off after Crowder and DailyWire: Crowder has Rumble contracts and a large following of former Fox News viewers (semi-legitimate) and DailyWire has institutional investors (Jeremy Boreing, Musk, large-scale advertisement networks; mixed legitimate with illegitimate), whereas Lotus Eaters always seems to be a few thousand dollars from total failure (almost purely crowd-funded). The best case for a leftist/BlueAnon conspiracy here is that having zero funding makes people seem "authentic". A second-best would be similar to Lindsay's argument that anything not purely '90s liberalism is just a useful reactionary group for the Regime to oppose (i.e., impotent inaction as a preferable state to actually organizing and responding). But, it is far more likely that the Regime truly opposes a legitimate "far right" not just to seed narratives against reactionaries but to suppress the sharing of ideas which could allow a counter-totalitarian movement. This goes back to my previous post ("Sat Feb 24 22:50:55") where the right should avoid adopting labels but instead should adopt principled strategies which oppose totalitarianism. This stands in opposition to those right-wing people who make errors such as "[I may as well call myself racist if the left is going to keep using that word!]" (the error of the Lupercalian wolf: engaging in the sin *after* the accusation; indulging for gratification before consequences arrive) and aligns more with the Lotus Eaters' attempt to brand "sensible centrism" as their political identity. The Lotus Eaters strategy forces the Regime to use their stated ideology when describing them, and low-information people exposed to this title would therefore respond to the title (The same trick that "Antifa" uses but without the deception, since on the right this forces the Regime to deceive and allows the right to re-claim the center). In short, if you still believe you're getting the full fact pattern from Fox News or Shapiro, you may as well be a leftist from 2 years ago. The smear-job Fight Club formula is at play: (a) Audience size (b) Proximity to truth (c) Effectiveness abc=x If "x" exceeds the Regime's tolerance for an Overton Window setback, they will smear. Is one variable large (e.g., popular) yet no smear? Then other items are too low (e.g., low truth). https://twitter.com/CherubCow/status/1703707363793125466 That is, programs with large audiences and corporate funding are likely to reflect the Regime's cultivated garden, merely corralling the right-wing to start marching as it lags behind the left-wing revolution. The strategy instead for operating amidst the Regime's control of propaganda is to reference the next red pills. So, even though TimCast is in itself a model of cowardice that has failed to reconcile the truth even 7 years after the 2016 mask-off, TimCast can be credited for platforming people such as Auron MacIntyre, and MacIntyre can be credited for platforming people such as Patrick Casey, the Distributist, and Millerman. This allows informed audiences to examine the ideas outside of the Regime's Overton Window while adopting the conclusions within a new Window which denies the Regime ammunition for counter-attacks (e.g., avoiding self-identification which the Regime can weaponize). This connects also with my refusal to adopt the "Global American Empire" (GAE) lie (largely from Parvini) or the "Critical consciousness" lie ("critical consciousness" as an synonym for "woke"). Both deny the reality of the situation by accepting a false vocabulary. On the right, "critical consciousness" is a coward's euphemism for slave morality, and the GAE is a "Noble Lie" for the global infiltration of governance. Ayn Rand made similar mistakes by using the word "Selfishness" to be sensational rather than exclusively using her actual meaning: rational self-interestedness and natural rights. It is the left's division of Inner and Outer Party which effects totalitarianism through these euphemisms — tricking the Outer Party into compliance with the euphamism while providing the nuanced meaning for only the Inner Party (e.g., "Whiteness" to deceive the Inner Party and actual White people to drive action for the Outer Party). The right must adopt terminology which obfuscates nothing so that it does not create such leftist monsters. "If you have knowledge, let others light their candles in it."
Cherub Cow Member	Mon Feb 26 05:31:48 Britain's beautiful Birmingham: http://twitter.com/kunley_drukpa/status/1762051723021996184 You see? Diversity has given this city so much foreign slop that who cares if the imported foreigners treat their surroundings like an open dump! Rubbish piles are our strength!
Cherub Cow Member	Mon Feb 26 07:16:09 Say what you will about the "Free Palestine" message itself, but self-immolating is no small act — much less committing to it once the pain arrives — and the comments blanketing this linked video (which may be taken down shortly) with claims such as "pathetic" (@WatchLoverRolly) or "stupid" (@NastaJeffrey) are absolutely unhinged. These people have no reverence for life, and so I hope they are mere sock puppets attempting to shift public opinion. (USAF airman Aaron Bushnell sets himself on fire in front of Israeli embassy in D.C.; he was rushed to the hospital and while no official reports currently say that he died, it seems likely that he will/did in particular because he probably flash-burned his lungs) http://twitter.com/Timcast/status/1762096796665323906 CNN: http://www.cnn.com/2024/02/25/politics/man-sets-himself-on-fire-israeli-embassy-washington-dc/index.html People also need to realize that this is more than just the impact of propaganda on the cult left (it is believed that Bushnell was a leftist who supported Biden). This truly is a global slave revolt in morality, and the left is attempting to un-seat Jews as the beneficiaries of that revolt by turning the "oppressor" label against them. Public self-immolation is a major blow to the Jewish narrative of "oppressed" status, and accounts such as Laura Loomer are revealing this through their psychotic counter-signalling ("Fuck him. He is a traitor to his country who lit himself on fire to support HAMAS" http://twitter.com/LauraLoomer/status/1761972737860403378 ). But I do not take sides in the oppressor/oppressed false dichotomy. I think that both Jews and Palestinians should be mass-deported from the West.
Cherub Cow Member	Wed Feb 28 00:04:19 Canada attempting more totalitarian expansion: "Minister of Justice and Attorney General Arif Virani announces the introduction of the Online Harms Bill, which includes hefty fines for online speech and stringent punishment including up to life imprisonment for hate crimes." http://twi...tre/status/1762266406383407281 Notice how they mix "Please, think of the children!" logic with other issues which cross the lines. The bill protects against p3d0 activity, but it also establishes "hate" punishments. The bill also protects children from "bullying", but remember who is pushing this bill: people who think that children should be chemically and surgically emasculated without parental consent. So, "bullying" children would be convincing them *not* to chop off their sexual organs. And, of course, the state's control of "hate speech" (which, again, is not a thing that actually exists) is just a way to censor opposition arguments. It is a transparent bypass of free-speech protections using protected classes as red herrings. So you have a few layers here which amounts to the global totalitarian Regime hiding their actual motives behind smoke screens of "protection" which actually produce a tyranny of state control. The left falls for this shit all the time.
Cherub Cow Member	Tue Mar 05 03:00:32 This is pretty black-pilling. "THE WPATH FILES "Advocates of gender-affirming care say it’s evidence-based. "But now, newly released internal files from the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH) prove that the practice of transgender medicine is neither scientific nor medical." [Shellenberger; March 4th, 2024] http://twitter.com/shellenberger/status/1764804774288125994 These "WPATH Files" are basically a collection of internal communications by chemical and surgical emasculation experts and genital mutilators (sometimes called "trans" advocates/doctors) saying what experience they've had with conducting human experimentation on unwitting children. Some of the highlights: • the hormone treatments are oncogenic (cancer-causing), with one case studied including the growth of an hepatic adenoma (liver lesion) and another hepatocarcinoma (liver cancer); this is because many medications are metabolized through the liver or otherwise target the liver and these emasculation chemicals target the liver more than the liver can handle. • "informed consent" is highly questionable, since the target group for this chemical and surgical emasculation most often has no concept of the long-term consequences. • Parents themselves often do not even understand the consequences and are not in a position to advocate for the health of their own children against the coercive practices of the emasculators. • In a particularly sickening note, a doctor semi-jokingly talks about an emasculated person returning to him in his or her 20s and, after having a dog as a surrogate child not "doing it for [him/her]", wants to know how he/she can have kids... and the doctor now has to explain to a mature adult that that's an option that they removed before this now-adult understood what it meant. • They talk also of the issue of where to time this chemical and surgical emasculation, aiming in particular for before Tanner Level-2 (stage at which there begins visible onset of sexual maturity) but running into the issue that beginning emasculation at this age means that these children will never be able to experience sexual pleasure or experience meaningful relationships (almost like the design of a sterilization program!). • They mention an issue we've covered here before, namely that patients undergoing chemical emasculation are prone to bouts of rage and emotional instability due to the hormones; this relates both to these chemicals creating Manchurian candidates and also these children simply having diagnosed mood disorders which were erroneously "treated" through chemical and surgical emasculation. • Sickeningly, this seems not to deter the doctors, since they believe that even someone with schizophrenia can be a candidate. • They note a high incidence of dissociative disorders in candidates (Oh??), including major depressive disorders, drug abuse, homelessness psychopathologies, and hallucinations. • The emasculators also complain about having to get the approval of therapists (Oh?? because maybe removing your genitals isn't an appropriate therapeutic response??). • They talk about patient regret and how they have to actively counsel people to accept what's been done to their bodies (Oh?? Only accept their bodies *after* sterilizing surgery??). Pretty disgusting list, honestly. It's becoming pretty acknowledged at this point that we're seeing a combination of Munchausen's by Proxy (parents messing with their children after misdiagnosing them for the parents' own benefit) and the effects of the Regime's prestige network. In the case of the prestige network, we see this in particular among actors and affluent people because the "hip" thing to do is chemically and surgically emasculate your children as a kind of signal that you're Regime-compliant. To these deranged leftists, keeping your children from breeding is like a signal that you're willfully dooming the future of your civilization. It's like the Capitol sociopaths in Hunger Games; once they start turning themselves into cat people, you pretty much know they're invested and they cannot reverse course. A truth and faithful member of the Party!
jergul large member	Tue Mar 05 07:39:12 Misdiagnosis and overdiagnosis is undoubtably the case in medicine for profit regimes. But there is no particular reason to think sexual identity is binary, nor that the overlap between identity and biology is 100%. Humans are complicated and biological gender assignment is based on pretty primitive and rudimentary principles from 2 billion years ago. I think I will classify this in the same way I do US abortions or gun control. Bejesus, freedumb is ludicrous. 3rd trimester abortions, gender correction surgery of children, the mass consumerisation of firearms? Get a grip.
Cherub Cow Member	Tue Mar 05 20:54:31 Totally normal scene of two bureaucratically enabled "British" people talking about how they hate having to live with those pesky native English: [March 5th, 2024] http://twitter.com/SydneyLWatson/status/1765072645211701346 So anyways, mass deportations cannot begin soon enough.
jergul large member	Tue Mar 05 22:18:23 So, where do you think you will be deported to? I feel certain you have an eclectic background giving a range of homelands to return to.
Cherub Cow Member	Tue Mar 05 23:50:30 This is another example of England falling: "Samuel Melia: Far-right activist jailed [for 2 years] after sticker campaign" [BBC; May 1st, 2024] http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-leeds-68448867 It's a good example of the dialectic I pointed out in the "africa" thread, wherein anti-White propaganda is used to take all recourse away from White people in the West ( http://utopiaforums.com/boardthread?id=politics&thread=92663&time=1709698453673 ). The BBC article is lacking in details, but Melia's wife appeared on Alex Jones today for details: (they show many of the stickers, discuss anti-White rhetoric, and discuss this global strategy) http://twitter.com/RealAlexJones/status/1765142747038519473 The essence of the judge's sentencing is that they made a determination of intent, motive, our potential outcome in Melia's sticker campaign; despite Melia himself having no violent history or demonstrable violent intent, they made the ruling based on the belief that such stickers *could* cause violence. This logic is very much embedded in totalitarian thinking and Marxist logic of representation under a totalitarian Regime. The logic goes that it is a thoughtcrime even to entertain certain subjects because the Regime has already made the conclusion that such thoughts lead away from the Regime's central powers — away from Party doctrine. By opposition, this Regime would fully allow people to pursue Marxist rhetoric and iconography with no reprisals (e.g., keeping the images and flags of Bolshevik mass-murderers in one's home and not caring), since that is the permitted direction of the proletariat revolt against society's "old thinking" (See Mao's "Four Old Things"). So, for the Regime and per the boomer "truth" (boomer delusions) of the post-CivilRights era, even *having* a White ethnic identity is a direct segue to Nazism and genocide. This is, of course, false and a non sequitur, and millennia of White identity precedes the boomer delusions of mustache man being the only possible outcome of White identity. Further, though, Melia did indeed have images and iconography related to mustache man, so the Regime can make this non sequitur slightly less obvious when distributed to the useful idiots. The simple reality, though, is that White identity has become such a taboo issue that those seeking an understanding of remedies to globalism and anti-Whiteism find a great deal of work has already been done by German thinkers. Even if accepting this, the Regime fails to understand that these German thinkers do not lead inexorably to genocide — that is more boomer delusion. The Jewish Question itself, for instance, in a de-coupled sense is useful in addressing discourse around a more general question: "What remedies exist when one's society has been infiltrated by a cabal of its enemies?" This question is one which anyone should be able to ask, since if you cannot recognize or enforce treason, then your society lacks the identity which prevents its annihilation. Further still, much of the discourse leading into the World Wars found the "solution" of genocide wholly unpalatable, so there exists a great deal of insight on the subject. I've covered this before, but one of the German strategies was mass-deportation from their home nation with encouraged Zionism as foreign policy abroad. Another solution was Madagascar. The issue with these meme solutions was that the cabal did not exist only in Germany, and the very act of deportation encouraged Judea to declare war on Germany, using its leverage in captured host nations to produce new enemies for Germany. And, in Germany deporting its traitors and infiltrators, these Judea client groups would potentially become assets of foreign empires during conflict. However, this would only be *within* conflict. This is why mass-deportation of the client groups would potentially be effective if war can simultaneously be avoided. Just as assuredly as in the case of South American economic migrants or Maghreb settler colonists, treasonous leftists could be deported to the "Global South" for which they betrayed the West. In the absence of war, these leftists — were they truly idealists — could surely improve the nations to which they were deported and would adopt the principles of these nations, since their ideology so clearly has them hating the West anyways. Would not a Norwegian leftist slave prefer living in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) and working in Chinese lithium mines on behalf of a growing DRC-native middle-class? Such labors would surely cure their spirits of their bourgeois mentalities (as in Mao's "Down to the Countryside Movement"), and certainly this would be a superior plan in comparison to the Nordic region's current planned strategy of completely dismantling its oil economy on behalf of the Global South (e.g., Denmark http://www.iea.org/policies/17708-denmarks-oil-and-gas-phase-out , Norway http://www.argusmedia.com/en/news-and-insights/latest-market-news/2503674-norway-must-prepare-for-end-of-oil-gas-climate-body ). By leftist reckoning, the Nordic fiefdom of 2050 is meant to produce no oil at all, but with a mass-deportation of leftists from the Nordic region, this oil production could continue and the deported leftists could realize their dream of "green" energy by mining for the DRC–China coalition. And if the boomer "truths" of the Star Trek TNG fantasy are to be realized, perhaps they can best be realized with such deportations. After all, if all of the destroyer leftists who have failed to act as guardians of Western values are deported from the West along with the infiltrator client-groups that acted as their golems, then the remaining coalition of virtuous and noble ethnicities remaining in the West (whether those being foreign births or not) would be more likely to have the bodies and spirits to protect Western values in the West's new shared future. And, if those deported leftists learned too late the virtues of the West, then perhaps their new hosts in the Global South could learn to appreciate those virtues as well, just as a Peace Corps contingent no doubt leaves a lasting mark through their service and does not merely build castles in the sand at low tide (e.g., https://twitter.com/kunley_drukpa/status/1658554759798824961 ). In short, mass-deportation of leftists could largely fix these issues we face today, and people such as Melia would find no need to identify with Uncle H or to leave interesting stickers. The judge who gives light sentences to pedos while over-sentencing thoughtcrime would himself find a beautiful frontier of arable land in Africa. It could be like the new Manifest Destiny for the left: the great open plains of Africa, all set for the great experiment of Communism.
jergul large member	Wed Mar 06 07:07:50 You do agree though that mass deportation of "white alt right" group affiliates would be equally as effective in resolving social conflict. To me, it just seems like the regime has more tools at its disposal. It could mirror your plan if it wanted too, or just wait for demographics to play out. In that sense, the seeds of white submission was sown with new anti-abortion legislation. Non whites will definitely suffer disproportionately by having and raising unwanted children. An example of be careful of what you wish for I guess. I take it you adhere to "even a single drop"? Meaning of course that mixed offspring fall into the non-white category. Uffda, that really messes with demographic outlooks. But this does give you the opportunity to have the courage of your convictions. No courage is required if you are destined to prevail. Courage is only needed if things can go horribly wrong. Good for you CC!
Cherub Cow Member	Mon Mar 11 08:27:36 It's kind of looking like Adam Schiff is testing to see if treason charges can be provoked in the modern era: "BREAKING: Adam Schiff states the U.S. Intelligence Community will withhold intelligence briefings from Donald Trump, conceiling information, sources, and methods if he wins re-election this fall." [March 10th, 2024] http://twitter.com/GeneralMCNews/status/1766902913064952214 And the typical totalitarian's logic: Schiff: "We can't trust that he will do the right thing with that information." It's such a cliché that it's almost not worth pointing out, but when people talk about others not being able to make the "right" decisions with the truth, they are paving the way for an ignoble people and for their own immoral actions (the cost of the "Noble lie"). This was a discussion that the founders had regarding the nobility of the people. As a self-fulfilling prophecy, you must have faith in the people (providing them the truth) to effect nobility in that people. Those who cannot manage the truth will fail the test, those that deny the truth to themselves also fail the test, and those who are denied the truth are deprived of the knowledge necessary to feed wisdom. Bolsheviks such as Schiff are determined to do the opposite: to destroy the nobility to create a caste of slaves. If he continues with this rhetoric, then may he be charged and found guilty of treason, then hanged by the neck until he is dead.
Cherub Cow Member	Tue Mar 12 05:19:15 Generic Zoomer girl and tumbletard share the same talking points on Trump: http://twitter.com/wilderpatriot/status/1766901853680251177
Cherub Cow Member	Tue Mar 12 06:05:34 Oof. The New York Times forced to publish that the driver of Trump's presidential limo on January 6th, 2021... reports no such reaching by Trump: [NYT; March 11th, 2024] http://www...,to%20go%20to%20the%20Capitol. "“I did not see him reach,” the Secret Service driver told investigators for the House panel. “He never grabbed the steering wheel. I didn’t see him, you know, lunge to try to get into the front seat at all. You know, what stood out was the irritation in his voice, more than his physical presence.”" This is fun because anyone with a brain was telling tumbletard and the delusional leftists that Cassidy Hutchinson was obviously unreliable and that she was speaking from pure hearsay (which is inadmissible), yet the January 6th Show Trials admitted her testimony and suppressed counter-evidence such as the driver's testimony. The article even goes on to say that there *wasn't* a coverup, and yet... "A letter from Jonathan E. Meyer, the general counsel for the Department of Homeland Security, provided a reason that the driver’s transcript had not been released. The House committee requested that the department review the transcripts for sensitive information that should be protected from disclosure so that the remainder could become “part of the historical record.”" It basically lends to the fact-pattern that had been reiterated since the Show Trials began: they had no good-faith requirement to provide the entire story. They had liars such as Hutchinson paraded in front of the psychosis left to deceive with one side of the story which could not even be corroborated. Even this NYT article struggles to save face, trying to say that Hutchinson was partly corroborated because — get this — Trump had a "tinge of anger" in his voice and was upset with Pence. Wow, "blockbuster testimony", to be sure. Honestly, though, if you believe people such as Hutchinson, Christine Blasey Ford, Liz Cheney, or Jussie Smollett, then your ideology chose *you*.
Cherub Cow Member	Wed Mar 13 06:44:11 Pretty funny Candace Owens video is making the rounds (especially funny if you don't take it seriously and instead just take it as People Magazine celebrity sideshows): "INSANE. This Is The BIGGEST Political Scandal In Human History." [March 11th, 2024] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v81g1tldi4c (the video is 42 minutes but the Macron subject is only 19 minutes) Her accompanying Tweet summarizes: [March 12th, 2024] "This episode is blowing up so I just want to say—After looking into this, I would stake my entire professional reputation on the fact that Brigitte Macron is in fact a man. Any journalist or publication that is trying to dismiss this plausibility is immediately identifiable as establishment. I have never seen anything like this in my life. The implications here are terrifying. "I do not intend to let up on this story and I am calling on other journalists to look into this explosive story and report accordingly." http://twitter.com/RealCandaceO/status/1767568441852969334 As many comments point out, this is similar to American theories about how Michelle Obama is actually "Michael" Obama (i.e., Big Mike), and the structure of the theory is even pretty similar — mostly based on "missing" pregnancy pictures. It has also been around for years, so this is just a recent reawakening. Some of the right is claiming to be annoyed by another distraction or psy-op, but those same people were hyper-fixated on Starship Troopers a week ago, and others among them (e.g., Neema Parvini) have children but spend their time rating women and trolling their own subscribers on Twitter as a kind of cynical IQ test, so their perceptions of importance are not necessarily above reproach. We all have frivolous vices or otherwise need breaks. Suspicious and cynical people under Parvini's Tweet even wonder why Owens has gone from a big JQ topic of asking what books the National Socialists were burning (short answer: lots of "trans" stuff since we're in Wiemar 2.0) to celebrity gossip such as the Macrons ( http://twitter.com/OGRolandRat/status/1767657412452901321 ). An even more cynical possibility given is that Owens was sent on this mission to fall on her sword, since making such a bold reputational claim could easily be used to ruin her reputation (if she is incorrect) and allow the left's propagandists to talk about how the right operates in 'conspiracy theory', citing her as an example. This strategy would certainly excite low-IQ credentialism leftists such as billythecoward, who use that thought-terminating cliché to avoid examining the opposition's actual arguments. Even so, Owens is just one pundit among many at Daily Wire, with many on the right considering Daily Wire to be largely controlled opposition — mainly a funnel for Ben Shapiro to siphon right-wing thought into his Zionist causes. Owens has maintained *some* credibility out of Zionist-suspicious right-wing thinkers, since she seems to overtly oppose Shapiro's Zionism and has even agreed with many of Ye's conclusions during her interactions with him. The narratives then become that Daily Wire itself hired her to discredit her, or the Daily Wire hired her without realizing that she would continue to pursue her curiosity and oppose them. In either case, the NRx crowd doesn't really care about Owens' success or failure beyond it converting a few normies, though the Regime's propagandists would certainly still use a fallacy of association to use any of her mistakes against the right at large. All said, Owens' secondary research on whether or not Macron's "wife", Brigitte Macron, is a man amounts to this: • Left-wing outlets dismiss the claims as "right-wing" and "conspiracy theory" but make no attempt to directly refute the claims (e.g., with actual images); one such example is Street Press, which makes sure to list a bunch of garbled connections to the Illuminati, Free Masons, Marine Le Pen's and Alain Soral's supporters, Catholic nationalists, far-right book stores, and discredited journalists (2022 https://www.streetpress.com/sujet/1649080404-derriere-fake-news-brigitte-macron-homme-clan-le-pen-chatillon-loustau-soral ). You can see them do this right off the top, since thought-terminating clichés are the Regime's strongest trick. They use clichés to list why useful idiots should look away *immediately*, and the useful idiots obey. It's an excellent way to suspend critical thinking. Once the well is poisoned, most people will just skim the article. You can see billythecoward do this all the time; he'll just call you a flat-Earther and fail to engage. • Brigitte is *much* older than Emmanuel Macron, with them supposedly meeting when Emmanuel was a teen; this would be consistent with "trans" people being p3d0s who must groom victims to have relationships • Brigitte Macron may have lied about age; possibly would have to be 8 years older than claimed for claims of independent living in the U.S. to be true • If lied about age, the updated age would align with Brigitte being an older male "sibling" pictured in a rare family picture • Brigitte facial features heavily match "brother" in old family photo but not features of "herself" in old family photo • Brigitte supposedly had children, but the "husband" does not exist in the public eye, "died", and cannot be located in images; the only image given was erroneously attributed and is another faculty member • Brigitte sued journalists for covering the story, but the reason was not defamation but privacy violation • No early-life photos of Brigitte exist, and one image appears to be a doctored image of Brigitte's own daughter but in black-and-white Owens' conclusions are thus that more images of a young Brigitte do not exist because they would show that Brigitte is a man (the same as the Michelle Obama theory). She then suspects that this is another sexual blackmail scheme, which would align with Whitney Webb's body of research. Moving from this conclusion, her further suspicion is that many such blackmailed politicians exist and have this kind of immense leverage against them to play ball. There is general truth to this, but she's potentially mixing-in a lie. E.g., people such as Epstein have shown that there truly exist CIA/Mossad/espionage sexual blackmail rings, but Brigitte may not be a proof-of-concept. She's technically a p3d0 (unless it's true that she waited 10 years before engaging a sexual relationship with Emmanuel) but maybe not "trans". As for Brigitte Macron, Brigitte is only 5'6" and passes the hands/feet check (small hands/feet). Brigitte *has* clearly had a rhinoplasty, since a mark of older rhinoplasties is the "Diamond nose" (think Michael Jackson; a very artificial but symmetrical shape that ops for a small round tip and nostrils that do not connect to the bridge smoothly), and another mark is a horizontal wrinkle under the nose in some facial positions (this occurs from cartilage not having a natural "hold" on the face anymore). But this kind of cosmetic work is not uncommon for aging elites, nor are the breast implants. At best, Owens' evidence is thin and undermined by a simply look at Brigitte's body type and age. Placing Owens' conclusion aside, it is a pointless risk to make that kind of "stake my entire professional reputation" statement, and as mentioned, she may not even be correct. She may simply be doing it as a gambit to see if she can get real images released, and even if such images *were* released, she could just pretend that they're not conclusive to save face. Still further, the French press is unlikely to address Owens, and Owens probably wouldn't hear about it if they did. So, in other words, it's a risk that no one will likely call her on, but it's thrown together with incomplete information and is dangerously stupid. What this *does* show is Gell-Mann Amnesia and the cost of lies. When people make errors like this, their entire body of punditry is called into question, since if *this* level of expertise is "research" to them (and they are paid for this) then you must wonder where else they have failed. I do not follow Owens, but this would be a huge red flag if I did. As for the cost of lies, this is what happens when the Regime's propaganda has so thoroughly demolished its credibility. Since CNN, MSNBC, Fox, PBS, AP, and so many others saw fit to destroy their credibility to hold onto power, many people have seen that the lies are spread through all of society and are forced to re-evaluate morality. This is the mechanism of the slave revolt: the reevaluation. In the case of the leftist slaves, their reevaluation stopped quickly as they merely adopted the oppressor/oppressed binary, believed the Regime, and waited for orders — denying obvious evidence to do it (e.g., tumbletard, billythecoward, sebgul). In the case of the disenfranchised right, trust networks had to be re-built. The result is that the right faces a grifter class that stops short of the truth to gain popularity (e.g., Timcast, the "Intellectual Dark Web", Joe Rogan, Daily Wire, Crowder, perhaps Blaze). Those who look beyond the grifter class risk the limits of their intelligence, intuition, or reason, as people such as Alex Stein have shown by having awful moon-landing theories (e.g., not understanding why the lunar lander was able to get away with aluminized mylar) or Donnie Darkened has shown by interpreting the world *entirely* through Back to the Future, Donnie Darko, and the Bible (lol). People with zero trust in anyone within any trust network may well fall into the theories that mental weaklings such as billythecoward make fun of as part of a fallacy of association, such as flat-earthers, UFO enthusiasts, DMT-dimension machine elves, or other absurdities. This is the cost of having no trust *and* no ability to discern truth from lie. This is, ultimately, why the task of reevaluating morality reveals the character of the reevaluator — whether through discipline, tenacity, focus, or reason. The left failed this test first since they *have* no character, deferring instead to the authorities of collectivism, disregarding that authority within collectivism is reduced to the fear of offending the collective (i.e., no collectivist "authority" will risk a truth which offends, and the collectivist left is easily offended). In abandoning the reason of the right (e.g., disregarding the possibility that any expert could exist within the right), the left lost this guiding expanded-sensorium and fell victim to their fearful "experts". The right, meanwhile, is willing to read the "experts" of the left to see what truths can be gleaned. Those who have re-evaluated morality and maintained a sense of the truth have tested their theses without ego and so differentiated truth from the progenitors of lies. This awakening is itself full of risks of falling into superstitions and errors, but it is so beyond the cowards of the left to even attempt it that they dare not even begin.
Cherub Cow Member	Wed Mar 13 09:03:52 This is a great Lotus Eaters (LE) video: "The Irish Punished Their Government" [March 12th, 2024; (29:50)] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oNJHIElfU4Y Short version is that LE re-cap the recent Irish referendum on changing the Irish Constitution to remove and semantically distort references to the family. The Irish Constitution currently says this on the subject of family: http://fra.europa.eu/en/law-reference/constitution-ireland-5 • "Article 41.1.1.The State recognises the Family as the natural primary and fundamental unit group of Society, and as a moral institution possessing inalienable and imprescriptible rights, antecedent and superior to all positive law. Article 41.1.2. The State, therefore, guarantees to protect the Family in its constitution and authority, as the necessary basis of social order and as indispensable to the welfare of the Nation and the State" • "The State pledges itself to guard with special care the institution of Marriage, on which the Family is founded, and to protect it against attack." The important thing to note here is that people have long pointed out that totalitarian and Marxist governments are hellbent on dissolving the family as the organizing unit of society because the family subverts the government's ability to Ice-Nine its control through the atomization of all people (i.e., if the family is a "protected class", then the government cannot replace and destroy its own people towards the promotion of new and slavish client groups). The Bolsheviks thus dissolved the family, as did the Maoists, as did the Khmer Rouge, as did the North Koreans, and so on. Nearly every totalitarian expansion or expansion to empire required the dissolution of the family, the destruction of its sacred meanings, and the subversion of its primary purpose of procreation and life-giving. This is why we so frequently see the cultists and the Regime apparatchiks decrying the possibility that a family might home-school or that a family has rights to its own children which can supersede the state's directives. So we have known this attack vector of totalitarians, but it's interesting to see that the international Bolsheviks working within Ireland are so transparently attacking it. They *had* to attack it *directly* because it was codified so strongly into the Irish Constitution. In the U.S., the method was to change what "marriage" meant — changing it from between a man and a woman based on the principle that this pairing could — in principle — produce children (i.e., "in principle" regardless of whether the man and woman are too old, infertile, etc.) to "[Fuck it, anyone and anything]". Through this vector, the family unit could subsequently be destroyed, allowing for, e.g., the "trans" delusion to take root, further cementing central totalitarian power through alternate client groups. For Ireland, they attempted to remove the phrase on "the Family" altogether, and they also had a separate referendum on watering down the meaning of "family" to include "durable relationship", which is effectively similar to the U.S. strategy of "domestic partnership". Through this strategy, the Bolsheviks could — as shown in an Irish TV debate at the end of the LE clip — give special protections to migrants living in Ireland. I.e., just as is taking place in the DNC Border Treason with the semantic game of "illegal" to "undocumented" ( http://utopiaforums.com/boardthread?id=politics&thread=92538&time=1710228244606 ) — with the intended result being that special protections can be extended to foreigners thus making the U.S. a borderless economic playground for global totalitarians — the changing of the Irish Constitution's meaning to *not* being family-centric and allowing "durable relationships" would allow the expanding of the franchise and Irish law's protections to foreigners. Thus you might notice how this chain-linking of client groups functions. The family is dissolved or diluted to accept gay marriage, gay marriage segues to the larger LGBTQ2S+NAMBLA coalition (expanding the protections to client groups more likely to possess slave morality and vote away sovereignty), and the LGBTQ2S+NAMBLA coalition is in turn replaced by special protections for foreigners. As the meme goes, the leftist asked to define "American" would basically just say, "anyone granted American citizenship" (i.e., a circular or bureaucratic formula which admits no ethos, ethnos, or identity). This leftist semantic manipulation is quite the point: dissolve citizenship to mean "literally anyone". At that point, the nation fails; it is already conquered. The Irish, fortunately, voted against the referendums, though black-pills in the comments point out that referendums do not stop totalitarians from continuing work towards their goals independent of the people's protests. As an aside, The Irish Constitution even reifies "woman" and "mother" as protected to such an extent that the state must step in if mothers are "obliged by economic necessity to engage in labour to the neglect of their duties in the home". Though, interestingly, this did not necessarily decrease the percentage of women in the labor force as much as it should have. Ireland is at 59.9% female employment. Compare to U.S. at 56.5%; the more totalitarian nations such as Canada (61.1%) New Zealand (67.6%) and the Nordic nations (Norway 61.8%, Sweden 63.4%, Iceland 70.1%) have some of the highest percentages in the civilized world ( https://genderdata.worldbank.org/indicators/sl-tlf-acti-zs/ ). It's interesting seeing how consistently these factors overlap. I.e., the more totalitarian nations • have more women in the workforce (a breakdown of the family unit; less motherhood at home), https://genderdata.worldbank.org/indicators/sl-tlf-acti-zs/ • are more compliant with sustainability frameworks, ( https://www.worldeconomics.com/ ) • accept greater DEI initiatives, (reflected by G-Index and S-Index https://www.worldeconomics.com/ ) • have the largest contributions of foreign aid to the Global South, https://www.wristband.com/content/which-countries-provide-receive-most-foreign-aid • have the greatest stake in Chinese energy, (reflected by E-Index and G-Index https://www.worldeconomics.com/ ) • had the most draconian lockdowns and COVID protocols, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COVID-19_lockdowns_by_country • have the greatest percentages of atheism, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_irreligion • have the highest "democracy" index (Bolsheviks love democracy), https://www.democracymatrix.com/ranking The attack vectors are plainly laid out, and they are being used openly.
Cherub Cow Member	Fri Mar 15 09:32:40 I did a little summary of postmodernism since Tucker Carlson (correctly) pointed out that postmodern architecture is ugly: http://twitter.com/CherubCow/status/1768631519030178083 • "Central traits of postmodernism are the destruction of foundations and unities, the end of history (nihilism, self-destruction, utopia as dystopia), and a psychological push for perpetual incompleteness." • "In architecture, this takes the form of buildings which appear to be "missing" something. A pyramid might be missing its pyramidion (peak) or a line may be drawn upwards towards a support (a foundation) yet reach only empty space; even what is "new" is meant to be shown as ruins." [Image of Tyrell Corporation from Blade Runner (1982)] • "In monuments, the viewer is shown "absence", such as the absence of the hero. It is the survivors who are represented—regardless of their virtue. Examples of virtue, completeness, and vision are denied in favor of client groups of "weak theory" who "re-center" their experience." [Image of Memorial to the Victims of the World Wars] • "In postmodernist works, civilization is refused its vision of "God"—a civilization's permanence, its sacred paint strokes, and the manifestation of its highest ideals. Postmodernism denies fixed meanings to prevent society from realizing itself and knowing its own identity." [Quotation by Roland Barthes, often cited in postmodernism]: "to refuse to fix meaning is, in the end, to refuse God and his hypostases—reason, science, law." • "Postmodernism wielded as a weapon thus becomes psychological and literal iconoclasm perpetrated against target societies. Lasting histories of marble, bronze, and oil&canvas are replaced by the historicity of the iconoclasts who—having no complete vision—only reduce and degrade." [Image collage of 4 iconoclastic moments in recent history] • "Where Nietzsche warned that one may pass through nihilism to find truth, postmodernism makes a destination of nihilism to deny truth and beauty. The "survivors" of the perpetual post-apocalypse search for a self that is not reflected in modernity and struggle to reproduce it." • "As an effect on cinema, postmodernism thus degrades truth and beauty, destroys heroes, deprives audiences of virtuous and creative examples, and provides no answers beyond self-destruction for sovereigns and resentment and revolt for the slavish." [images from my article on ESG cinema propaganda] • "The postmodernist doubts everything, including his own humanity. In a world without foundations, every step away from the real increases doubt that the real was true experience vs. a deception from nostalgia; by the time the past is understood it becomes too late to act upon it." [Image from Blade Runner: origami unicorn] • "The red herring of gnosticism is merely this: simulation. While the West falls into dissimulation, the new oligarchs, who effected postmodernism in the masses while maintaining the permanence of their gods and idols, intend to emerge in the real with their nightmarish new throne." [Image from "The Cell" (2000)] -=-=-=- This relates also to earthpig attempting to use the thought-terminating cliché of "conspiracy theory" against me in another thread ("White people are not real Londoners"; August 2023; http://utopiaforums.com/boardthread?id=politics&thread=92011&time=1693389035705 ). He dismissed my below reply as "conspiracy theory" by typing "conspiracy theory" prompts into ChatGPT: ========= [CC]: "This is the lie told by the acolytes of the liberal city. The delusion typically goes that cities themselves necessarily make people more liberal. This is false and is plainly pointed out in Marshall McLuhan's explanations of the media as message and in postmodern critiques of architecture and city-planning (particularly the classic example of Napoléon razing Paris so that only standing armies would have power in its streets — a scheme favorable for his consolidated control schemes). "Without the jargon: the *designers* of cities determine the political outcomes of cities, and it is only a *recent* phenomena of the West's totalitarian age that cities have been constructed to create slave castes (i.e., constructed to fulfill the circular lie of the "inevitable" liberal city). City designers began doing this as a way to totalize control of their populations. We see this in the outer arrondissement slums, for instance: mass-produced boxes for mass-produced slaves imported to serve conquering oligarchs..." ========= But this is plainly stated in postmodern literature. I've read more postmodernism than I care to admit, which is why I know that James Lindsay has been wasting his time with gnosticism (hence why I call it a red herring). Postmodernism simply uses simulation to trap people in mental frameworks — gnosticism just being another simulated space. And the psychology of city-planning is part of this attempt to reduce people to simulated spaces. These include the old tactics of the "company store", where debt-bondage systems would try to trap people in local areas through company housing, convenience stores, special company currency, etc. There is a very explicit psychological effect in having to see the same conditions every day and to be unable to escape them. In the case of postmodern architecture, we're talking about buildings designed to signal perpetual incompleteness. We even have Jewish Bolsheviks such as Walter Benjamin relating this to the idea of reproducibility, where the mass-production of consumer items can be used to trap people in debt bondage since these "incomplete" items are only ever special in their "new-ness", and this "new-ness" of consumer goods replaces the sacred (e.g., the family altar, the Church). In other words, with a totalizing system imposing postmodern features of incompleteness (e.g., architecture, cinema, consumer goods, media), people can only participate in society through actions which keep them feeling "incomplete". This is seen in doom-scrolling formats on social media (again, "The Medium is the Message"), in the binge-watching of bad television whose writing has nothing for the soul, in franchise cinema such as the MCU keeping audiences in a perpetual distress where they can only feel "complete" when the final movie is released — and perhaps it never will be before the next reboot. In modernity (which postmodernism critiques to destroy), the "new" was accomplished through a return to the altar — through a reaffirmation of the sacred. So, for instance, the Greeks would continue to tell the Iliad and Odyssey, and poets that followed Homer would add to this altar with stories that followed up with the heroes and speculated about other aspects of their lives. In recent attempts, this was seen in media such as the Odyssey TV mini-series (1997), the Lord of the Rings (2001 – 2003), the VVitch (2015), The Northman (2022), and other attempts at *faithful* adaptation. In postmodernity, this imperative is replaced with a hijacking of re-affirmation. For postmodernist Lyotard in 1985, participating in modernity is merely like pursuing "careers in mass conformism" (1985), but the goal of this was not for conformism to end but for postmodernism to use modernism as a referent for such a long time that postmodernism could only refer back to postmodernism (i.e., the simulation refers to itself; conformism would become "good" through conformity with the simulation). This is Jean Baudrillard's territory, where this loss of referent causes people to only be able to support the simulation — this, also, was a goal of the Frankfurt School's work on the "culture industry". In short, for the postmodernists such as Lyotard, Barthes, Foucault, and the Frankfurt school, the goal was to hijack the re-affirmation of modernity (i.e., hijack the apparatus which causes society to re-affirm its sacred values in modern day) and turn them into an affirmation of the slave revolt (for Barthes: "[destroying the gods of society is] an activity that is truly revolutionary"). This was the slow project of the 19th and 20th centuries following the Bolshevik infiltration of the West. Postmodernism merely became a means of describing this process. And this is simultaneously why I say that postmodern theory is itself useful. It is the choice faced by Donnie Darko or Neo in the Matrix: the system is very explicit about what choice it wants people to make, but people still have the ability to choose, and in understanding what the choice means is power (the "why"). Postmodernism is an acid which when wielded by the enemies of the West can destroy it, but by understanding its mechanism the enemies of the West can be understood and thwarted — similar to the role of the Palantíri (seeing stones). As I mentioned before as a metaphor: "What is the value of Larry Fink's unlocked cell phone?"
Cherub Cow Member	Sun Mar 17 01:18:03 Niger is kicking out U.S. military personnel: "Niger junta repudiates deal allowing US military bases on its soil" [The Guardian; March 16th, 2024] http://www...-us-military-bases-on-its-soil "Niger’s ruling military junta says it has revoked with immediate effect a military accord that allows US military personnel and civilian staff on its soil." This would be a strategic win for China, which has Belt-and-Road projects in the region and would benefit from the U.S. losing presence there: "Niger: what dangers does the coup pose to China’s Belt and Road Initiative?" [Africans On China; August 2023] http://africansonchina.com/niger-what-dangers-does-the-coup-pose-to-chinas-belt-and-road-initiative/#google_vignette China also would be able to expand its uranium mining in Niger, which could go towards weapons projects and its planned massive expansion of nuclear power: http://archive.ph/20130705204807/http://aiddatachina.org/projects/256 So we're talking about a military loss for these U.S. and an expanded presence by China — which these U.S. pay for through "sustainability" programs which fund China's Belt-and-Road. In other words, the West paid China to out-bid the West in Niger using military, mining, and debt-relief projects.
jergul large member	Sun Mar 17 05:55:58 Non-US Nato collectively is short 56 billion per year from the 2% spending guideline. Does this shortfall free the US from article 5 obligations?
Cherub Cow Member	Mon Mar 18 05:53:24 Just a reminder here that I have previously warned tumbletard that @Acyn on Twitter is a transparent propaganda account. I did a writeup on the Acyn account in June 2022 and warned tumbletard repeatedly since then about how Acyn's propaganda functions*. Even so, tumbletard has cited Acyn four times in his latest psychosis thread**. That said, the latest DNC propaganda making the rounds is the deception of distorting Trump's mention of a "bloodbath" in a political speech. It was outed so quickly as a transparent deception that I was expecting the DNC would drop it, but here's Acyn running with it, and Community Notes has still not addressed it: "Trump: Now, If I don't get elected, it's gonna be a bloodbath. It's going to be a bloodbath for the country." [March 16th, 2024] http://twitter.com/Acyn/status/1769102618213638350 And do notice the propaganda technique here. Acyn simply says, "Trump: ...", but he uses no quotation marks, meaning that he can discretely editorialize Trump's actual stated words. This allows him to omit the full quotation (which included a reference to "that" — something which would key people into the clip not being a complete statement and thus requiring further context to understand what "that" refers to). The intent here is to pass this falsified quotation as an actual quotation while Acyn gives himself a retreat option to "[it wasn't a quotation since I didn't use quotation marks]". Useful idiots can also claim that the accompanying video *does* include the full quotation (it doesn't, of course, though it does include the missing *middle*-section that was omitted by Acyn), but what's the propaganda *there*? This is similar to the technique of "front page lie" followed by "back page retraction". The idea is that *most* interactions on a post are simply people scrolling and uncritically digesting the headlines. So, *most* people will simply read the sensational text and *not* watch the video to confirm the text, since quickly reading is far faster. There are even memes pointing out this phenomenon of content-digestion on Imgur, e.g., http://imgur.com/gallery/5AErPZg This above meme mostly applies to Imgur's format, but it is instructive. This is how the *common* user operates (i.e., within a Bell curve), and it takes cognitive training to get out of this trap. It's similar to the old phenomenon of red pop-ups. Red was used because it draws the most attention, but at some point, red pop-ups and intrusive bars became so common that people trained themselves not to even see them, similar to how older teachers have a tendency not to maximize YouTube videos when they play them on a projector (they don't really "see" the obstruction of the video player). For Twitter, the order of attention goes.. 1) Eyes drawn to the memetic material (the image) The user determines whether or not the image is worth further cognitive investment. If the image is not worth cognitive investment (e.g., no dopamine hit from the image, seen it before, looking for other content), then they will continue to scroll. In the case of a Trump image, a TDS user will likely be activated for more investment. 2a) Eyes drawn to the avatar of who posted the meme/image Twitter is designed with echo-chamber logic, so usually users can bypass even looking at the avatar (especially in the "following" section for people who only follow by agreement), but if trust is *low* then they will look secondly at the avatar. If they trust the avatar (e.g., a familiar user), they will be primed to digest the information in accordance with that user's gimmick (e.g., get ready to laugh, get ready to be angered). If they do *not* trust the avatar (e.g., unfamiliar user, recognizable enemy-camp user) then they will be primed to disagree with whatever commentary they see. 2b) Eyes drawn to the user's text If trust is *high* (good echo-chamber insulation), the user will look secondly at the text. They will look to see that the text confirms their expectations for the image. 3a) If the text has low cognitive investment but high reward, they will read the entire text and emotionally react. 3b) If the text has high cognitive investment, they will probably not even bother and will simply go to the comments to see a lower cognitive response that summarizes. 4) If they have been convinced by their belief in trust networks, they will not even look at the video; they will save themselves the time and merely commiserate with the psychosis network in the comments, further amplifying psychosis emotions. In short, propagandists such as Acyn are manipulating some very overt features of the medium. On Imgur, the manipulator-user strategy was to absolutely spam content and just go for volume through theft of trending Tweets, Reddit comments, Occupy Democrats Tweets, etc.; eventually, something sticks. People too often would fail to read the screen names, so the same users would be rewarded with featured content even if they blatantly stole the material generated by others. Many users were so low-IQ that they would upvote duplicates, or they would simply upvote duplicates because they wanted to make sure that others become as upset as they are (compare to the strategy of downvoting the re-poster and upvoting the earliest instance to make sure that only the originator/creator is rewarded). The strategy is similar with Twitter, but because Twitter uses a "follower" formula, most of these propaganda accounts merely steal from the DNC's own talking points. I've mentioned this before in how these psychosis accounts function, but the DNC already releases these clips in their edited format, drawing the attention of these sock puppets and propaganda accounts. Someone such as tumbletard will see a CNN broadcast of some already-edited clip, then think that he's simply retrieving it from Acyn as a reference item (i.e., erroneously believing that Acyn is merely a purveyor of information that he already wanted), but all that this means is that tumbletard fell for the CNN deception and simply used a CNN duplicator to further duplicate the propaganda. There are, of course, critical ways out of this (e.g., insisting on always searching for C-SPAN full videos, getting camera feeds that had zero edits (i.e., not news network coverage)), but, again, this behavior exists in a Bell curve. You can track this sort of behavior when you watch the mental processes of the comment section. Often, people will not even be responding to the material in the video/image. This can simply be sock puppets who latched onto key words and populated automatic responses (e.g., programmed with [if "Trump" mentioned then post meme saying, "Trump is bad"]). But, in cases where sock puppetry is not at work, you can simply see which people were fooled by the deception. The Acyn comment section is ratioing him, but leftists tend to block right-wing accounts to re-enforce their echo chambers, so those ratios often have no effect on the left-wing psychosis (they're already blocked by leftists). So Imgur is much more instructive of what this looks like within the echo chambers: https://imgur.com/gallery/nSS9x0U You can watch their thought processes. Most of them simply accept the narrative: that Trump was promising a bloodbath if he lost (a lie). So the filtering process happens like this, with fewer and fewer people going through the order: 1) Users see the image, which tells them that Trump said it would be a "blood bath" (a lie) 2) They then see the title, which says, "And yet they clap", making the propagandized mob viewing Imgur believe that Trump's supporters want a "bloodbath" (another lie) 3) Users then go to the comment section to boost their psychosis rage, and every single comment with upvotes is assuming that the initial lie was true; they are merely there to say psychotic things to each other, including people who are actively calling for Trump's a55a55ination (e.g., "Will no one rid us of this venomous prick?", "Will no one rid us of this feckless asshole?", "He needs to die.", "Lone wolf time") 4) Those users who go into the comments see yet more of the same (further agreement) 5) *If* someone is interested in a counter-point, they scroll down *within* a comment section to see who has been downvoted. A few people with *no* upvotes are pointing out that the clip is out-of-context — compared to 577 upvotes for comments which took the lie at face value. 6) Those who *do* offer a counterpoint have to signal that the mob is nevertheless correct to have a psychotic response (e.g., "Out of context quotes for net points hurts the cause against Adolph Trump.") 7) Those very few who accept that the quotation is out-of-context will start bargaining, such as multiple users who make arguments similar to this: "Considering I live in the city he said this in I can assure you many followers are saying it was literal. They are not clinging to the parts about the auto industry, they are looking for the “hidden messages”" (i.e., these users will actually *project* their own observation of left-wing psychopaths who fell for the propaganda onto right-wing people who did *not* fall for the propaganda, pretending that the hidden message of the propaganda was actually for the *right*, likely falsifying stories to sell this lie to themselves as "[false but perhaps true somewhere]"). In short, you can see how these psychosis accounts falsify narratives to activate useful idiots. Tumbletard falls for these stories constantly because he has no sense of the manipulation that he is experiencing. He simply checks the credentialism network, believes their narratives, and proceeds as though they are true. If or when he perceives some bad information within the narrative, he simply applies the Gell–Mann Amnesia effect, totally forgetting that he was just lied to by a source and even re-visiting them again later with total confidence in their sincerity. *(2022 writeup of Acyn here in Totalitarians #2: http://utopiaforums.com/boardthread?id=politics&thread=89974&time=1656327448729 ). **(tumbletard's latest psychosis thread (#43) http://utopiaforums.com/boardthread?id=politics&thread=92621&time=1710704441722 ).
Cherub Cow Member	Mon Mar 18 23:51:28 This is making the rounds: "Murthy v. Missouri Supreme Court Oral Argument" [C-SPAN; March 18th, 2024] http://www...ri-supreme-court-oral-argument Regime-installed justice Ketanji Brown Jackson asked this of Missouri (this is the actual beginning of her question; not edited): 1:35:24 — "So my biggest concern is that your view has the First Amendment hamstringing the government in significant ways, in the most important time periods. Umm, I mean, what would you have the government do? I've heard you say a couple times that the government can post its own speech, but in my hypothetical, umm, you know, "Kids, this is not safe, don't do it," umm, is not going to get it done. And, so, I guess some might say that the government actually has a duty to take steps to protect the citizens of this country, and you seem to be suggesting that that duty cannot manifest itself in the government encouraging or even pressuring, uhh, platforms to take down harmful information. So, can you help me? Because I am really worried about that, umm, because you've got the First Amendment operating, umm, in an environment of threatening circumstances from the government's perspective, and you are saying the government can't interact with the source of those problems." On the one hand, you could soften this by saying that she's specifically introducing the context of government speech controls on platforms during emergencies, but, on the other hand, even *then* you'd have to overlook her inability to realize that the First Amendment is indeed *designed* to hamstring the government in *all* cases (e.g., even emergencies) and that she is advocating that the First Amendment not be able to do so. Louisiana Solicitor General J. Benjamin Aguiñaga responds to clarify this, effectively saying that *if* the government wants to interact with social media, it cannot be in the capacity of violating the First Amendment. Ketanji Brown Jackson seems pleased with a potential loophole in Aguiñaga's reply, which is that social-media platforms may have a duty to "amplify" government speech during limited emergencies and limited and specifically justified events, but you can kind of tell from her response that she takes that to mean that government-speech-amplification can come with an equal amount of non-government-speech-*de*-amplification (i.e., dampening free speech and First Amendment protections) and that whenever the government speaks — by the virtue of it being the government — it rises to the level of "emergency". So people are rightly concerned that Jackson is yet again speaking from a frame of reference that assumes that the government can bypass all speech protections and the Constitution itself for its own centralized imperatives. This is part of the same extension of tyranny that was demonstrated during the pandemic. The pre-pandemic (good faith) assumption was that in pandemic emergencies the government needed to be able to release information to the public to aid in public health and that this may well be the only type of event where libertarians themselves (might) relax the cause of liberty to hear the government's central voice. But, within a few months of the government's interventions, it became clear that this good-faith assumption was incorrectly placed and that the government should never and in no circumstances be able to violate free speech protections. The First Amendment is *indeed* absolute, and wherever the government searches for exceptions and uses pilpul to undermine this truth via, for example, "emergency" exceptions, it is merely demonstrating that it is interested in a terminal exception which violates liberty. In the case of Murthy v. Missouri Supreme Court, the liberal justice challenge is thus centered on their belief that content-moderation and state action do "not" violate the First Amendment because "[Mommy needs to tell the kids how to behave.]" This is the very essence of the Longhouse formula of perpetual childhood effected in the citizenry.
Cherub Cow Member	Wed Mar 20 01:28:10 Here the J's go again, trying to mobilize the nations to set the stage for the building of the Third Temple and messianic totalitarianism: "This Red Cow Might Destroy the World" [Propaganda & Co.; March 8th, 2024] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2T5t22DZjlQ TLDR: The J's have been provoking Palestinians by importing red heifers into Israel with the expectation that in April 2024 they can sacrifice one in sight of the Holy of Holies amidst the Dome of the Rock, thus setting in motion the founding doctrine for the Third Temple's construction. So they sacrifice the heifer as it comes of age in April, the Dome of the Rock is destroyed (collapses on its undermined foundations), war breaks out in the Islamic world, the West destroys Israel's Middle Eastern enemies, Third Temple is constructed, the "messiah" arrives, and Judaism subjugates the world — and this makes some Evangelicals happy because "[yay, second coming. Enslavement is neat-o and we're totally not controlled opposition for the J's.]" Sound crazy? It *is* crazy, but here's CBS News saying the same thing: "What these red cows from Texas have to do with war and peace in the Middle East" [CBS News; March 5th, 2024] http://www.cbsnews.com/news/israel-war-hamas-red-heifers-from-texas-jerusalem-jewish-temple-al-aqsa/ • "Jerusalem — When Hamas spokesman Abu Ubaida began a speech marking the 100th day of the war in Gaza, one confounding yet eye-opening proclamation escaped the headlines. Listing the motives for the Palestinian militant group's Oct. 7 massacre in Israel, he accused Jews of "bringing red cows" to the Holy Land. • "The cows he was talking about are red heifers, which now graze at a secure, undisclosed location in the Israeli-occupied West Bank. Some Jews and Christians believe they're key to rebuilding the Jewish temple that once stood in Jerusalem, and to beckoning the Messiah." • "But she makes no secret about what she wants to happen to the Dome of the Rock. [/] "I believe it's going to go, 100%. The whole thing is going to go to build a temple," she said, insisting that the shrine and its golden dome should be preserved, but relocated." • ""Everyone says that the building, the Third Temple, is what will bring the war, it would destabilize the Middle East," she said. "The Middle East seems pretty destabilized right now, and the war, if I'm not mistaken, is already here."" • ""We're going to accept the Messiah, and we need the Messiah to come," Byron Stinson, a Texan who helped bring the cows to Israel, said at the gathering. "For me, the red heifer is red for the blood of Jesus Christ. That's why it's red."" Yeah, so anyways, I hope we have our Titus Caesar Vespasianus ready for such outcomes.
Cherub Cow Member	Mon Mar 25 06:17:11 As a follow-up on Candace Owens, things seem to have settled down following Owens' interview with Rabbi Barclay on March 18th: [Candace Owens Podcast; March 18th, 2024 (1:43:19) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GJ9GQ-gexhQ For those not in-the-know on this one, leading into this Owens had been in a months-long spat with Rabbi Shmuley (@RabbiShmuley; Jacob Shmuel Boteach), who styles himself "Republican" but is transparently subversive, trying to sell people on having "Kosher sex" ( https://www.timesofisrael.com/kosher-sex-store-in-tel-aviv-run-by-rabbis-daughter-sells-spice-for-marriages/ ). Shmuley's daughter sells "Kosher" sex products, and Rabbi Shmuley — despite supposedly advocating against pornography — has helped his daughter, Chana Boteach, promote a variety of these sex products. (Incidentally, Alex Jones in the last couple hours got into an argument with Shmuley and may be debating him on his show.) Thus, a different rabbi, Rabbi Barclay wrote an article about Owens essentially defaming her. Owens had him on her podcast and attempted to go point-to-point with Barclay about all of the lies he told about her, with him even conceding many of them as lies that he told for effect before he had evaluated her character (as though that justifies them). Highlights of things that they did not agree upon, however, were much more instructive. A central point is the primary issue with Judaism (as also with Calvinism and Lutheranism), which is that this special-elect or "Chosen" belief has some fundamental flaws which poison all discourse around it. That is, by believing that one is "Chosen", he can justify all manner of terrible ideological inconsistencies downstream, such as Marcuse's "repressive tolerance" (one-way application of power and discourse) and Marcuse's source: the retention of slave morality while claiming "Master" status. In an explicit example, Rabbi Barclay *repeatedly* asks for Owens to recognize Jewish death as "uniquely evil", while refusing to answer Owens' question about whether or not Barclay is saying that the deaths of innocent children (e.g., Israeli, Palestinian) should be divided between a "qualitative" argument, as Barclay seems to suggest but does not say outright. That is, Barclay clearly believes that Jewish life is worth more — even in the innocent state — which is consistent with "Chosen" beliefs and supremacy. He even connects this at one point to 4th Israeli PM Golda Meir's statement: "We can never forgive the Arabs for making us kill children." This "How could you make me do this?" logic is, of course, the logic of sociopathic abusers (e.g., "[You just make me so crazy!]" said by a man who has just beaten his wife bloody). This same logic was used by George Soros when he justified how he was able to take part in the confiscation of Jewish property despite being Jewish himself: Soros: “Well, of course ... I could be on the other side or I could be the one from whom the thing is being taken away. But there was no sense that I shouldn’t be there, because that was — well, actually, in a funny way, it’s just like in the markets — that if I weren’t there — of course, I wasn’t doing it, but somebody else would — would — would be taking it away anyhow. And it was the — whether I was there or not, I was only a spectator, the property was being taken away. So the — I had no role in taking away that property. So I had no sense of guilt.” ( https://www.nationalreview.com/the-morning-jolt/the-truth-about-george-soros-is-damning-enough/ ) This sociopathic abuser logic of "someone else would do it anyways" is used also by telemarketers, scammers, collection agencies, and all manner of immoral enterprises. It combines with a deterministic fallacy where people pretend that they are not principle agents but just market actors. It is this same deterministic fallacy which runs through "Chosen" beliefs, since if one is "Chosen", one is merely acting in accordance with a determined reality which cannot be changed. This directly connects also with slave morality and the Wheel of Fortune («Rota Fortunae») since the belief goes that one is either a master or a slave (fortunate or unfortunate) and that it is only the disinterested turning of a wheel which determines one's position — rather than one being a conscious actor who imposes this dialectic. It is a self-insulating delusion, and Rabbi Barclay exemplifies it in his every rhetorical tactic during this interview. There are other aspects further confirmed in the interview as well, such as the slave's need to justify slave morality and perpetual victimhood with the "best" narrative/justification (the best propaganda). This is because a slave who has truly succeeded in a slave revolt now holds the power of the former nobility, so should he not now demonstrate nobility? No. The logic of the slave revolt prevents this since the slave army will see the signs of a new master and revolt again, thus, the new master must pretend still to be a slave. The Catholic Church did this through its priestly class, whose positions of power were justified via an ascetic lifestyle (e.g., priests not being allowed to wed). The Jewish manipulation of this story occurs through the Shoah and now their staged 9/11 of the October 2023 attacks. That is, in order to claim perpetual victimhood (i.e., to possess slave morality despite having a master's/enslaver's wealth), a slave must have convincing lies which justify all of their immoral activities. ("The Jew cries out in pain as he strikes you.") Barclay plays with this by constantly pretending to be hurt while threatening Owens with the exercise of his power. He uses the strategy that BLM similarly adopted: pretending that his "lived experience" (his personal perception) is itself the truth of his victimhood, and that no one else can deny this due to his "unique" victimhood as a Jew. Even towards the end, he gives Owens one last chance to say sorry to him, hinting that he is about to go to Temple and have a meeting with a "mutual friend" who might be interested in whether or not Owens has been brought to heel. Owens declines, having seen no factual argument for Barclay's slander/libel of "anti-Semitism", and, as we now know, Daily Wire fired Owens. So you'd have to wonder how much of this is theater designed specifically to *increase* anti-Semitism (i.e., "[look what we did so quickly to someone who did not kiss the ring]") or if they truly believe that these rhetorical deceptions are convincing. The Owens video has a staggering 61,000 comments currently, and there does not even seem to be a successful sock-puppet counter-movement among them; the vast majority is critical of Barclay. So, the deceptions likely are *not* convincing. When people see so transparently that power is applied one-way, they do not see Western values of equality-under-the-law reflected. And while Neema Parvini might recently have gone lukewarm on this point, his previous position in "The Populist Delusion" (2022) is that power *wants* to make itself known so that people know what the power structure is and can comply with it, so it is entirely possible that regardless of how badly Rabbi Barclay came off here, the transparent exercise of his power was far more important to their propaganda. There is a credible amount of power in being able to claim that there "[is no Jewish conspiracy]" and insist that someone believe that lie while holding over someone's head this same (actual) conspiracy's ability to destroy that someone. I have even seen Jewish academics *use* this exact same technique while discussing this technique as a "trope" or Catch-22, where they pretend that *not* using their cabal powers would leave them vulnerable to attacks by people who call them a cabal. The logic truly insulates itself and avoids self-reflection; it makes sure to cast its powers as deterministic and inviolable — evading the responsibility of nobility while exercising the power that it claims not to have.
Cherub Cow Member	Wed Mar 27 04:48:56 "Mandatory State Training Steers Judges To Question Fitness Of Parents Who Don’t Affirm Gender-Confused Kids" [Daily Caller; March 26th, 2024] http://dai...t-affirm-gender-confused-kids/ • "Judges who handle child abuse and neglect cases in California are required to take a training on LGBT issues that pushes them to consider whether parents who object to their child’s preferred pronouns should have custody." • "The Judicial Council of California’s “LGBTQ+ Considerations” training, offered twice annually for judges working on juvenile dependency cases, instructs judges on how to handle youth gender identities, advising them to “be aware that LGBTQ youth may be at risk of harm at home, school and in other settings due to biased or uninformed attitudes or conduct by peers/adults,” according to a presentation from June 2023 obtained by the Daily Caller News Foundation via a public records request. After citing statistics on mental health problems among LGBT youth and warning judges to stay alert about “physical or emotional abuse” by parents that does not have a “clear reason,” the presentation puts forward three hypothetical scenarios for the judges to sort through." Reading through the slides, you can see how the state attempts to insert themselves as a wedge between parents/guardians and propagandized LGBTQ2S+NAMBLA youth. They're basically trying to get judges to make decisions based on the false premise that "affirmation" is "good thing" and that judges might have to order parents not to interfere with groups that affirm, to order that children be relinquished to organizations that affirm (e.g., half-way homes), or to order restraining orders against people who do not affirm (e.g., friends, family). This type of action would ensure that the state can insist upon chemical and surgical emasculation/sterilization of children through an inverted sense of "protection".
Cherub Cow Member	Fri Apr 05 07:36:46 Totally normal for a foreign nation to hold this kind of power over a Western politician: "Sir Alan Duncan has been placed under investigation by the Conservative Party after criticising his colleagues for backing Israel, Sky News understands" [Sky News; April 4th, 2024] http://twitter.com/SkyNews/status/1775875808344588749 Article direct link: http://news.sky.com/story/tory-ex-foreign-office-minister-sir-alan-duncan-investigated-by-party-after-israel-comments-13107785 "In response to news of the investigation, Sir Alan said: "Although I have heard nothing myself, I have been told by many in the media that the Conservative Party has issued a statement to say that I am to be investigated by them with a view to expulsion. ""They did not lay out any substantive grounds for their action." Sounds like more Cardinal Richelieu logic. He said something "bad" about Israel, so they're investigating him to see if they can find a crime.
Cherub Cow Member	Mon Apr 15 19:57:53 Dan Crenshaw is such a terrible person that tumblefag will probably start using him as an example of one of the "good" GOP members — like Liz Cheney: "After nearly five years of silence, an ex-SEAL team member describes their experience with Congressman Dan Crenshaw (@DanCrenshawTX) of Texas. Heartbreaking story." [April 13th, 2024] http://twitter.com/simonateba/status/1779146033542434881
Cherub Cow Member	Wed Apr 24 01:22:30 This was making the rounds when the traitors in our government voted to expand Ukraine funding, but it's even more notable now that Massie is being fined for posting a video of the traitors from within the chambers: (Mostly Democrats waving Ukrainian flags following the funding of New Khazaria bill) http://twi...sie/status/1782858040657510501
	show deleted posts

Your Name:
Your Password:
Your Message: