Utopia Talk - Politics

Welcome to the Utopia Forums! Register a new account
The current time is Sat Apr 27 03:08:18 2024

Utopia Talk / Politics / africa

Sam Adams
Member Mon Mar 04 22:57:57
Now arriving in australia.

http://x.com/EndWokeness/status/1764618013477572918?s=20

Cherub Cow
Member Tue Mar 05 02:29:01
Diversity is their strength.

patom
Member Tue Mar 05 06:47:43
I thought this was a primarily white nation. All the white people stood by and let this happen?

Cherub Cow
Member Tue Mar 05 22:14:13
Yes, patom, because Western nations are being conquered through infiltration and treason, and totalitarian sycophants such as yourself have enabled it.

What action would your totalitarian Regime *not* propagandize as unacceptable?

*Un*acceptable to your Regime:
• A group of White men fight back, brutalizing these violent and diverse scholars and would-be NASA coders.
Media Response: "Systemic racism! White supremacy! Hate crime!"

• A single White man intervenes, managing not to hurt anyone while stopping the violence.
Media Response: "White savior! White knight! Colonialism! Sexist! Racist! Bigot!"

• White people complain about being unprotected under the law against a coalition of "protected classes" who receive special protections with asymmetric benefits.
Media Response: "White fragility! White victimhood! White tears!"

• White people suggest that Civil Rights legislation has produced conditions which precipitate racialist strategies in the West which are designed to replace and disenfranchise White people.
Media Response: "Dinosaurs that need to go extinct! Conspiracy theory! Racist! Fascist! Nazi!"

• White people peacefully protest injustices against White people in public.
Media Response: "White Supremacy! Nazis!"

• White people build a coalition with other ethnic groups for the shared interest of stopping all criminals regardless of race.
Media Response: "Tokenism! Systemic inequities! Systems of white supremacy! Unequal outcomes!"

• White people complain that society has been infiltrated by a cabal of its enemies who are actively undermining society against them.
Media Response: "Conspiracy theory! Antisemitism! Fascist! Nationalist! Far-right! Populist scum!"

• White people advocate for a nation of their own which can be protected from replacement migration — as is the case in nearly every other nation in the world.
Media Response: "Colonialism! Racism! White supremacy! Fascism! Nazism!"

The boomer truth (i.e., boomer delusion) of the post-CivilRights era was that the West could offer liberty to all ethnicities who were willing to hold this mantle of liberty in earnest. The current reality is that we have found out that Western nations are occupied by enemies whose first act upon gaining power is to dismantle Western civilization and its Greco-Roman WASP Enlightenment heritage, sell the West piecemeal to their origin nations, and make the West into global economic zones that can be enslaved by the "Global South". When this condition is illustrated to the masses, the best response we see from the totalitarian sycophants is that of a wolf that knows that it has cornered its prey and no longer has any need to pretend to be anything less than a malevolent devourer.

Rather than these people seeing the virtue of liberty and wishing to preserve it among their hosts who created it, they mock the very idea that these hosts should ever have lived and mock them for expressing any route which would prevent their annihilation. They think it's *funny* that they have cornered their prey. Many of these totalitarian sycophants are so resentful that they would destroy all of society to feel a single spark of power even as it means that all fires are extinguished together eternally.

Dukhat
Member Wed Mar 06 02:17:12
These kind of videos are what Dylan Roof watched before he went on a shooting rampage.

There is no policy or anything productive being suggested. It's just trying to incite rage.

Fuck Sam for bringing dumb out-of-context racist fearmongering.

Cherub Cow
Member Wed Mar 06 03:16:55
Sometimes I wonder if Dukhat actually does read my comments and is just pretending to be the exact type of dumbass that I'm describing, maybe as some fulfillment of his role as a multi account.

I just posted this in the totalitarians thread:
"They made the ruling based on the belief that such stickers *could* cause violence. [/] This logic is very much embedded in totalitarian thinking and Marxist logic of representation under a totalitarian Regime. The logic goes that it is a thoughtcrime even to entertain certain subjects because the Regime has already made the conclusion that such thoughts lead away from the Regime's central powers — away from Party doctrine."

I summarized the same thing here:
https://twitter.com/CherubCow/status/1649380558160662529
• "A reminder regarding the Marxist/Marcusean “repressive tolerance” of slave morality (the intentional one-way application of power):
Regime media applies standards purely based on whether or not they can further Marxism and villainize non-Marxists."
• "They hide the identity of their criminal castes if one of theirs has victimized the target group, but if the target group can even slightly be perceived as harming one of the Marxist criminal caste, then the entire weight of Regime propaganda will accelerate on the issue."

In other words, Dukhat here sees a video of migrants attacking native Australians. His response? It should not be shown at all; the very presence of the video could "incite rage". And, in the ideology of the totalitarian state, the very possibility that something could cause "rage"/"hate" means that it should be hidden from the public. The totalitarian state does not believe that the public should know things which might cause them to "hate" (incidentally, this is even shown as a metaphor in "Equilibrium" (2002)).

Of course, this is backwards logic. You must be able to stare into the abyss to know how to address the abyss. You cannot address the abyss if you are watching only the Regime's lies about the world and never see the abyss. The global totalitarian Regime has long hidden from the mass-public events such as the one in this video, and despite the prevalence of these sorts of attacks, they have made a concerted effort to hide the identities of the perpetrators. We saw this with the Pakistani grooming gangs in the UK, we see this with the lies about who is committing crimes in the United States (the propaganda not reflecting the statistics), we see this in the Nordic nations that hide the consequences of Islamic immigrants, we see this in government-sponsored advocacy groups which counsel victims to not identify their attackers publicly if the attackers are a protected class.

But despite the Regime's best efforts, these events are visible to every day people who have basic pattern recognition, and people have come to the correct conclusions despite the propaganda: these people need to go back.

Citing "Dylan Roof" as a consequence of knowledge is outright stupid. Dylan Roof was a consequence of media gas-lighting and MK Ultra conditioning (metaphorically; not literally MK Ultra). Totalitarians gas-lighting people about what's going on has an atomizing effect. This is a source of totalitarian strength, since atomized people cannot form groups to oppose the totalitarian government, but it also produces millions of people who discover the same exact thing independently (e.g., that their governments are betraying them) but also find that media is willfully silent about the betrayal.

And what happens to an atomized young man such as Roof, who believes he has secret knowledge yet no avenue of voicing his knowledge or effecting change? He turns into one of Dostoevsky's Underground Men. To the leftist mind, this creates an Antifa psychopath, filled with Regime propaganda and determined to bring about the Regime's "secret" prophecy — and so the Regime plays into its "positives" for their gain or downplays/ignores its negatives as they did with the BLM Insurrection of 2020. (Did Dukhat at that time complain about missing context from hundreds of recycled police violence videos? Likely not, since he agreed with the conclusions of the fear state induced within him.) To the right-wing mind, it can produce the same effect, but the Regime capitalizes on any right-wing attack as "proof-of-concept" of their warnings — when it was they who created him.

TLDR:
Dukhat's response is pure Regime logic. The Regime would prefer that we never know about the statistical realities of racialist violence. As for solutions, he would simultaneously advocate *against* prisons when those prisons "happen" to result in certain ethnic populations being over-represented. "What are the Huron to do?"
Send them back.

show deleted posts

Sam Adams Member	Mon Mar 04 22:57:57 Now arriving in australia. http://x.com/EndWokeness/status/1764618013477572918?s=20
Cherub Cow Member	Tue Mar 05 02:29:01 Diversity is their strength.
patom Member	Tue Mar 05 06:47:43 I thought this was a primarily white nation. All the white people stood by and let this happen?
Cherub Cow Member	Tue Mar 05 22:14:13 Yes, patom, because Western nations are being conquered through infiltration and treason, and totalitarian sycophants such as yourself have enabled it. What action would your totalitarian Regime not propagandize as unacceptable? Unacceptable to your Regime: • A group of White men fight back, brutalizing these violent and diverse scholars and would-be NASA coders. Media Response: "Systemic racism! White supremacy! Hate crime!" • A single White man intervenes, managing not to hurt anyone while stopping the violence. Media Response: "White savior! White knight! Colonialism! Sexist! Racist! Bigot!" • White people complain about being unprotected under the law against a coalition of "protected classes" who receive special protections with asymmetric benefits. Media Response: "White fragility! White victimhood! White tears!" • White people suggest that Civil Rights legislation has produced conditions which precipitate racialist strategies in the West which are designed to replace and disenfranchise White people. Media Response: "Dinosaurs that need to go extinct! Conspiracy theory! Racist! Fascist! Nazi!" • White people peacefully protest injustices against White people in public. Media Response: "White Supremacy! Nazis!" • White people build a coalition with other ethnic groups for the shared interest of stopping all criminals regardless of race. Media Response: "Tokenism! Systemic inequities! Systems of white supremacy! Unequal outcomes!" • White people complain that society has been infiltrated by a cabal of its enemies who are actively undermining society against them. Media Response: "Conspiracy theory! Antisemitism! Fascist! Nationalist! Far-right! Populist scum!" • White people advocate for a nation of their own which can be protected from replacement migration — as is the case in nearly every other nation in the world. Media Response: "Colonialism! Racism! White supremacy! Fascism! Nazism!" The boomer truth (i.e., boomer delusion) of the post-CivilRights era was that the West could offer liberty to all ethnicities who were willing to hold this mantle of liberty in earnest. The current reality is that we have found out that Western nations are occupied by enemies whose first act upon gaining power is to dismantle Western civilization and its Greco-Roman WASP Enlightenment heritage, sell the West piecemeal to their origin nations, and make the West into global economic zones that can be enslaved by the "Global South". When this condition is illustrated to the masses, the best response we see from the totalitarian sycophants is that of a wolf that knows that it has cornered its prey and no longer has any need to pretend to be anything less than a malevolent devourer. Rather than these people seeing the virtue of liberty and wishing to preserve it among their hosts who created it, they mock the very idea that these hosts should ever have lived and mock them for expressing any route which would prevent their annihilation. They think it's funny that they have cornered their prey. Many of these totalitarian sycophants are so resentful that they would destroy all of society to feel a single spark of power even as it means that all fires are extinguished together eternally.
Dukhat Member	Wed Mar 06 02:17:12 These kind of videos are what Dylan Roof watched before he went on a shooting rampage. There is no policy or anything productive being suggested. It's just trying to incite rage. Fuck Sam for bringing dumb out-of-context racist fearmongering.
Cherub Cow Member	Wed Mar 06 03:16:55 Sometimes I wonder if Dukhat actually does read my comments and is just pretending to be the exact type of dumbass that I'm describing, maybe as some fulfillment of his role as a multi account. I just posted this in the totalitarians thread: "They made the ruling based on the belief that such stickers could cause violence. [/] This logic is very much embedded in totalitarian thinking and Marxist logic of representation under a totalitarian Regime. The logic goes that it is a thoughtcrime even to entertain certain subjects because the Regime has already made the conclusion that such thoughts lead away from the Regime's central powers — away from Party doctrine." I summarized the same thing here: https://twitter.com/CherubCow/status/1649380558160662529 • "A reminder regarding the Marxist/Marcusean “repressive tolerance” of slave morality (the intentional one-way application of power): Regime media applies standards purely based on whether or not they can further Marxism and villainize non-Marxists." • "They hide the identity of their criminal castes if one of theirs has victimized the target group, but if the target group can even slightly be perceived as harming one of the Marxist criminal caste, then the entire weight of Regime propaganda will accelerate on the issue." In other words, Dukhat here sees a video of migrants attacking native Australians. His response? It should not be shown at all; the very presence of the video could "incite rage". And, in the ideology of the totalitarian state, the very possibility that something could cause "rage"/"hate" means that it should be hidden from the public. The totalitarian state does not believe that the public should know things which might cause them to "hate" (incidentally, this is even shown as a metaphor in "Equilibrium" (2002)). Of course, this is backwards logic. You must be able to stare into the abyss to know how to address the abyss. You cannot address the abyss if you are watching only the Regime's lies about the world and never see the abyss. The global totalitarian Regime has long hidden from the mass-public events such as the one in this video, and despite the prevalence of these sorts of attacks, they have made a concerted effort to hide the identities of the perpetrators. We saw this with the Pakistani grooming gangs in the UK, we see this with the lies about who is committing crimes in the United States (the propaganda not reflecting the statistics), we see this in the Nordic nations that hide the consequences of Islamic immigrants, we see this in government-sponsored advocacy groups which counsel victims to not identify their attackers publicly if the attackers are a protected class. But despite the Regime's best efforts, these events are visible to every day people who have basic pattern recognition, and people have come to the correct conclusions despite the propaganda: these people need to go back. Citing "Dylan Roof" as a consequence of knowledge is outright stupid. Dylan Roof was a consequence of media gas-lighting and MK Ultra conditioning (metaphorically; not literally MK Ultra). Totalitarians gas-lighting people about what's going on has an atomizing effect. This is a source of totalitarian strength, since atomized people cannot form groups to oppose the totalitarian government, but it also produces millions of people who discover the same exact thing independently (e.g., that their governments are betraying them) but also find that media is willfully silent about the betrayal. And what happens to an atomized young man such as Roof, who believes he has secret knowledge yet no avenue of voicing his knowledge or effecting change? He turns into one of Dostoevsky's Underground Men. To the leftist mind, this creates an Antifa psychopath, filled with Regime propaganda and determined to bring about the Regime's "secret" prophecy — and so the Regime plays into its "positives" for their gain or downplays/ignores its negatives as they did with the BLM Insurrection of 2020. (Did Dukhat at that time complain about missing context from hundreds of recycled police violence videos? Likely not, since he agreed with the conclusions of the fear state induced within him.) To the right-wing mind, it can produce the same effect, but the Regime capitalizes on any right-wing attack as "proof-of-concept" of their warnings — when it was they who created him. TLDR: Dukhat's response is pure Regime logic. The Regime would prefer that we never know about the statistical realities of racialist violence. As for solutions, he would simultaneously advocate against prisons when those prisons "happen" to result in certain ethnic populations being over-represented. "What are the Huron to do?" Send them back.
	show deleted posts

Your Name:
Your Password:
Your Message: