Utopia Talk / Politics / journalists

Sam Adams Member	Fri Apr 05 15:55:25 http://www...e-change-bandung-b2522422.html How climate change is hitting vulnerable Indonesian trans sex workers Joya Patiha, a 43-year-old Indonesian transgender woman, first started to notice that changing weather patterns in the mountain-ringed city of Bandung were affecting her income as a sex worker a decade ago.
murder Member	Fri Apr 05 16:34:56 I feel the need to say ... "Not all journalists."
Cherub Cow Member	Sun Apr 07 15:19:15 All Journalists Are Bastards (AJAB) You think you hate journalists enough, but you don't.
kargen Member	Sun Apr 07 16:06:12 "The press is a gang of cruel faggots. Journalism is not a profession or a trade. It is a cheap catch-all for fuckoffs and misfits—a false doorway to the backside of life, a filthy piss-ridden little hole nailed off by the building inspector, but just deep enough for a wino to curl up from the sidewalk and masturbate like a chimp in a zoo-cage." Hunter S Thompson
Im better then you 2012 UP Football Champ	Mon Apr 08 14:02:38 Nixon had the same opinion.
Cherub Cow Member	Mon Apr 08 14:12:54 Nixon was right.
Cherub Cow Member	Mon Apr 08 15:54:01 I can't believe that umm... "MAGA"... would do this: (Latest "this is MAGA country" just dropped) "Men punching random women in NYC: A desperate last gasp of the male rage fueling MAGA" [Salon; April 8th, 2024] https://twitter.com/Salon/status/1777338185745395917 Direct article: http://www...of-the-male-rage-fueling-maga/ "Unleashed by Donald Trump and the MAGA movement, there's an upswell of loud male entitlement shouting at us from every corner." I can't believe the male entitlement of the.. umm.. MAGA movement... in New York City. Biggest lie in the article: "Women report being assaulted by men of different races and ages." Sure thing! lol So I guess that means that MAGA is a very diverse movement and is making a big resurgence in NYC? And "Journalist" Amanda Marcotte said this of her article on Twitter: http://twitter.com/AmandaMarcotte/status/1777421300245418273 "Oh men, just know that your angry emails are going unread. If I see a man's name on the email and a mention of punching women, I know what you're going to say and will delete without a read. "I can see that you feel seen and do not like it!" A comment points out: "*makes this assumption on emails she deleted without reading*" This is reminiscent of the Tumbleweed Method and is common to leftists: they didn't read or comprehend what you wrote in response to them, but that won't stop them from lying about your reply or claiming to possess a high ground (also built on lies). They can only be correct if kept insulated from the truth — in this case the truth being that these women in NYC were most likely assaulted by black and brown men who vote DNC.
Sam Adams Member	Tue Apr 09 11:43:20 "Women report being assaulted by men of different races and ages." Lmfao. 48 assaults were by africans, 2 were by hispanics and 1 was by a white dude. Different races!!! No pattern here!! Screeched the journalists in unison.
Cherub Cow Member	Tue Apr 09 11:53:50 NPR Journo Uri Berliner (senior business editor) admits what we all knew (except for tumblefag-types): "I’ve Been at NPR for 25 Years. Here’s How We Lost America’s Trust. Uri Berliner, a veteran at the public radio institution, says the network lost its way when it started telling listeners how to think." [April 9th, 2024] http://www...or-how-npr-lost-americas-trust • "Like many unfortunate things, the rise of advocacy took off with Donald Trump. As in many newsrooms, his election in 2016 was greeted at NPR with a mixture of disbelief, anger, and despair... But what began as tough, straightforward coverage of a belligerent, truth-impaired president veered toward efforts to damage or topple Trump’s presidency" • "Persistent rumors that the Trump campaign colluded with Russia over the election became the catnip that drove reporting. At NPR, we hitched our wagon to Trump’s most visible antagonist, Representative Adam Schiff. "Schiff, who was the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, became NPR’s guiding hand, its ever-present muse. By my count, NPR hosts interviewed Schiff 25 times about Trump and Russia. During many of those conversations, Schiff alluded to purported evidence of collusion. The Schiff talking points became the drumbeat of NPR news reports. "But when the Mueller report found no credible evidence of collusion, NPR’s coverage was notably sparse. Russiagate quietly faded from our programming. "It is one thing to swing and miss on a major story. Unfortunately, it happens. You follow the wrong leads, you get misled by sources you trusted, you’re emotionally invested in a narrative, and bits of circumstantial evidence never add up. It’s bad to blow a big story." -=-=-=- =-=-=-= • The article goes on to talk about NPR turning a blind eye to the Hunter Biden laptop story: "During a meeting with colleagues, I listened as one of NPR’s best and most fair-minded journalists said it was good we weren’t following the laptop story because it could help Trump." • It also breaks that leftist-psychosis narrative about it merely being the right that made COVID political (We all knew that was a lie, except tumblefag-types, but here it is plainly): "Politics also intruded into NPR’s Covid coverage, most notably in reporting on the origin of the pandemic ... The lab leak theory came in for rough treatment almost immediately, dismissed as racist or a right-wing conspiracy theory. Anthony Fauci and former NIH head Francis Collins, representing the public health establishment, were its most notable critics. And that was enough for NPR. We became fervent members of Team Natural Origin, even declaring that the lab leak had been debunked by scientists. [/] But that wasn’t the case." • They also talk about carrying the lie of "systemic racism" as "a given": "Our mission was to change it ... And we were told that NPR itself was part of the problem ... Race and identity became paramount in nearly every aspect of the workplace." • They standardized their language in accordance with ESG/DEI: "The current contract, in a section on DEI, requires NPR management to “keep up to date with current language and style guidance from journalism affinity groups” and to inform employees if language differs from the diktats of those groups. In such a case, the dispute could go before the DEI Accountability Committee ... And this, I believe, is the most damaging development at NPR: the absence of viewpoint diversity." They followed the Master–Slave false dichotomy (slave morality): • "More recently, we have approached the Israel-Hamas war and its spillover onto streets and campuses through the “intersectional” lens that has jumped from the faculty lounge to newsrooms. Oppressor versus oppressed." The author knew they were lying about the Florida bill: • "On March 10, 2022, I wrote to a top news executive about the numerous times we described the controversial education bill in Florida as the “Don’t Say Gay” bill when it didn’t even use the word gay." And think about the cost of these lies. People such as tumblefag actually *believed* the liar and Bolshevik Schiff, despite him being an obvious liar, and believed the poisoned fruits of that tree. Regime media also pretended that only *their* coverage of COVID was a-political, which produced in their useful idiots the false sense that they were looking at "objective" coverage. And even today, these tumblefag-types *still* have TDS, believing that if they just stare hard enough at Trump that they'll divine the Regime's next talking points — all based upon this poisonous tree of abandoned lies and misdirections. That said, these "journalists" — who think they'll pull a Bari Weiss by "restoring" their credibility despite falling for all of the groupthink during the crucial hours when their judgment actually mattered — can all get fucked. We didn't need another too-late retrospective from a Regime apparatchik. All that articles such as this do is give *another* "out"/escape to the psychosis left, and if they have not taken an out at this point, then their character has been tested enough. This is merely a sentencing hearing.
Cherub Cow Member	Tue Apr 09 11:56:15 [Sam Adams]: "Different races!!! No pattern here!! Screeched the journalists in unison." She must have been psyched to get that outlier. It's the old Bell Curve move: "[Ummmmmm. Not *all*! What about the tail ends of the Bell Curve?? Checkmate, MAGAts!]"
murder Member	Tue Apr 09 12:03:53 "I’ve Been at NPR for 25 Years. Here’s How We Lost America’s Trust." NPR hasn't lost America's trust. They lost the Confederacy's trust. Only MAGA Trumpers say that NPR has lost America's trust.
Cherub Cow Member	Tue Apr 09 12:22:22 murder still believes the NPR Regime-propagator signal. Sad.
Cherub Cow Member	Wed Apr 10 04:25:22 "Journalist" Amanda Marcotte was right: those damn MAGA Republicans, terrorizing women in...... Italy -=-=- "Italian women are being terrorized & chased by gangs of "brown Arabs". It's a longer video I trimmed, but she's saying that she lives in fear of sexual assault, robbery, and death because of what Italian leaders have done. Milan is swarming with illegals from Africa and the ME. In this last incident, "I was only saved after a taxi driver swerved over and told me to get in"." http://twitter.com/UltraDane/status/1777889690240319563
Cherub Cow Member	Mon Apr 15 10:39:18 "Journalist" Max Aitchison wrote this headline: "Who is Bishop Mar Mari Emmanuel? Priest at Wakeley's Christ The Good Shepherd Church attacked in second Sydney stabbing is a known anti-vaxxer with huge online following" [Daily Mail; April 15th, 2024] http://www...xer-huge-online-following.html • "The attack comes just days after six people were stabbed to death in a separate rampage at Sydney's Westfield Bondi Junction." • "'Officers arrested a male and he is assisting police with inquiries,' the spokesperson added." See that? The Islamic-looking man who stabbed this priest is "a male", but the Christian priest who was stabbed is an "anti-vaxxer". This is how Regime journalists code friend and enemy.
Cherub Cow Member	Wed May 01 05:49:36 "Journalist" Andrew Kersley claims that "grooming" is happening in the UK! Oh, wait. That's true. Pakistani grooming gangs are raping English women and grooming them to continue being rape victims, drug addicts, and prostitutes for other Pakistanis and Muslim men. But guess what the "journalist"'s spin is? It's the "far right" that is "grooming" these women... "to further anti-Muslim hate". :| [May 1st, 2024] http://twitter.com/DrEllaC/status/1785594060083749358 "Hugely important in-depth exposé of how the far right are grooming victims and survivors of child sexual abuse. With powerful & brave testimony from “Lara” & a really sharp, thoughtful look at various factors contributing to this brutal mess. By @AndrewKersley for @BylineTimes" A top comment is sure to point out that this is (yet again) the Norm MacDonald joke: "What terrifies me is if Muslims were to systematically groom and rape thousands of underage White girls. Imagine the backlash against peaceful Muslims?" It's the same balance/scale of leftist immorality. They cannot say anything about their Pakistani client group being rapists, and they cannot care about White women being raped; but they *can* care about backlash against their pro-rape policies. ("[How dare you try to protect your people from rape!]") This is, incidentally, also why some Western governments have agencies that deploy to families affected by these sorts of tragedies. They do not want some "American History X" public moment where someone says the truth about crime in leftist-run areas, so they coach the victims and their families to say that they forgive the abusers and just wish that more leftist policies were in place to make Western society more accepting of its rape.
Cherub Cow Member	Mon Jun 03 09:41:21 "Police officer stabbed during attack at far-right rally dies" [Sky News; June 2nd, 2024] http://x.com/SkyNews/status/1797484719556202499 Notice the strategic omission and inclusion: • They cannot identify that the stabbing was perpetrated by a Muslim man. • They *do* identify that this was at a "far-right rally" The insinuation is that far-right people stabbed a police officer. The reality is that a Muslim invader attacked Germans in their nation.
Sam Adams Member	Mon Jun 03 12:54:43 Typical journalists
murder Member	Mon Jun 03 13:24:16 Muslims ARE far right.
Cherub Cow Member	Tue Jun 04 19:52:00 murder is basically a "journalist" now. Shameless obfuscator. In reality, we know that the left supports Islam within its slave coalition, so, at best, murder is admitting that the left wants "far right" Muslims within their movement. This fulfills the golem purpose of mass-migration, where the left believes that right-wing elements from foreign nations can be used to sack the West. I.e., the left will support the "far right" of conquering nations so long as that "far right" destroys the "far right" sisters and brothers within their own nations, being that the left are composed of traitors who hate their own families. But, of course, more to the point, this media source had no intention of coding Muslims as "far right". Regime media avoids that statement since it reveals the above. They were coding White Westerners *against* Muslim occupation as "far right" and protecting their client group (the Muslims). In fact, leftists within this German city showed up to oppose this "far right" White Westerner group the following day — *supporting* the Muslim man who stabbed them and killed one of the city's White police officers. In short, murder hates his own people more than he hates a Muslim conqueror within his own nation, and his "far right" red herring does nothing to dispel this. murder has, in fact, proudly admitted this repeatedly.
murder Member	Wed Jun 05 05:16:06 "In short, murder hates his own people more than he hates a Muslim conqueror within his own nation" I hate you both equally. :o)
Cherub Cow Member	Sun Jun 23 06:48:30 "2 men arrested in strangulation of 12-year-old Houston girl whose body was found in a creek" [AP News; June 20th, 2024] http://apn...b535cc2d1a27fc972c6f83c3d33e8a AP "journalists": "2 men" Reality: "2 illegals from Venezuela who entered illegally in March 2024" Border Patrol spokesman via Fox: "On March 14, Martinez was apprehended by the U.S. Border Patrol near El Paso, Texas. That same day he was released on an order of recognizance with a notice to appear," the spokesperson added. "Pena was apprehended by the U.S. Border Patrol on May 28 near El Paso. He was also released on an order of recognizance with a notice to appear the same day he was apprehended." Incidentally, this is part of the DNC Border Treason as well; "journalists" just support that treason.
Cherub Cow Member	Sun Jun 23 10:01:05 MSNBC pundit Symone Sanders thinks that the illegal/criminal invaders who murdered a 12-year-old should be described as "undocumented": http://x.com/EndWokeness/status/1804620231765102693
Paramount Member	Sun Jun 23 11:08:36 Genocide Joe is ultimately responsible for her death.
Rugian Member	Sun Jun 23 11:38:07 Adding this one for the record. "Far-left US pundit who rolled eyes at hostage’s sister axed by The Hill By TOI STAFF 7 June 2024, 4:28 pm Far-left commentator Briahna Joy Gray, who has repeatedly sought to cast doubt on the sexual violence perpetrated against Israeli women during the Hamas-led terror onslaught, announced Friday that she has been fired from The Hill where she co-hosted its morning news talk show “Rising.” The announcement came after Gray went viral Wednesday when she was caught aggressively rolling her eyes and cutting off Yarden Gonen, the sister of hostage Romi Gonen, who urged her to believe Israeli women’s accounts of sexual assault during the October 7 onslaught. “I really hope that you specifically will believe women when they say they got hurt,” Gonen said at the interview, to which Gray responded with an exaggerated eye roll. “Okay, thanks for joining. Stick around,” Gray said." http://www...tages-sister-axed-by-the-hill/
Rugian Member	Mon Jun 24 10:27:34 Ahead of this week's debate: "CNN cut off an interview with former President Donald Trump’s campaign spokesperson Monday morning. CNN anchor Kasie Hunt ended the interview with spokesperson Karoline Leavitt after the latter brought up comparisons made by one of CNN’s anchors and debate moderators between Trump and Adolf Hitler. Leavitt said it would be easy to find comments made by Jake Tapper, who will host Thursday’s presidential debate, that compare the former president to Hitler. It would take someone five minutes to Google ‘Jake Tapper Donald Trump’ to see that Jake Tapper has consistently frequently likened President Trump to Adolf [Hitler],” Leavitt said as Hunt interrupted her. Hunt warned Leavitt twice she would end the interview if the spokesperson continued discussing Tapper. Leavitt argued she was repeating Tapper’s comments, which Hunt rejected. “I am going to stop this interview if you continue to attack my colleagues,” Hunt said. “I would like to talk about Joe Biden and Donald Trump, who you work for. If you are here to speak on his behalf, I am willing to have this conversation.” CNN ended the interview after Leavitt repeated her argument. “Karoline, thank you very much for your time. You are welcome to come back at any point,” Hunt said. “She is welcome to come back and speak about Donald Trump, and Donald Trump will have equal time to Joe Biden when they both join us now later this week in Atlanta for this debate.” Following the exchange, Hunt claimed on social media that Leavitt was disrespecting Tapper. You come on my show, you respect my colleagues. Period,” she wrote on X. “I don’t care what side of the aisle you stand on, as my track record clearly shows.” Leavitt said the interview showed that CNN would treat Trump unfairly in the debate. “You cut off my microphone for bringing up the debate moderator’s history of anti-Trump lies,” she wrote. “This proved our point that President Trump will not be treated fairly on Thursday. Yet he is still willing to go into this 3-1 fight to bring his winning message to the American people, and he will win.” http://nbc...rs-and-debate-moderators-trump This debate is going to be a total shitshow, with two biased anti-Trump moderators who have access to a mute button. The deck is definitely stacked against him.
patom Member	Mon Jun 24 17:18:57 Trump will love it. The more drama the better for him He thrives on it.
Cherub Cow Member	Tue Jun 25 03:02:45 [Rugian]: "This debate is going to be a total shitshow, with two biased anti-Trump moderators who have access to a mute button. The deck is definitely stacked against him." I'm hoping that his campaign is thinking of gaming it the way they gamed the 60 Minutes interview. In that case, Bolshevik Jew Lesley Stahl attempted to deceive during the interview and then falsify victories in the edit, but all Trump's team had to do was record the entire thing on a cell phone and release it — unedited — to the public. Anyone paying attention was able to see how much 60 Minutes lied by omission and edits — similar to the Show Trial edits. In the case of this debate, they've clearly attempted to game things by creating a format that allows Biden to hide his dementia. Trump not being able to interrupt due to mutes means that Biden can just repeat whatever is in his ear or read scripted talking points (whereas being interrupted makes his fragile dementia-mind skip a beat and permanently lose track). But, if the Trump team records when CNN is muting, records the un-muted audio, and ignores the mutes (allowing Trump to interrupt), then they can release the unedited video and show how pathetic Biden is. I've also seen someone on Twitter/X suggest that Trump's team simply delaying the debate by about an hour would cause Biden's team to screw up their timing of Biden's uppers. Biden's dementia/Parkinson's means that he sundowns very sharply, so they've been giving him amphetamines or some drug cocktail when needed (See, e.g., the hard cuts in Biden's 2022 NOBLE conference speech http://x.com/CherubCow/status/1553361561061888000/ or as a meme http://imgur.com/gallery/amphetamines-ftw-Rb8SIf0 ). If they can force bad timing of Biden's drug cocktail, then they can cause Biden to sundown on stage; Biden may even get a migraine aura (symptoms similar to a stroke) and be unable to speak. CNN would probably protect from this strategy by insisting that things proceed on schedule, but if the Trump team is not actively thinking of ways to expose Biden's dementia on stage — despite all of CNN's tricks — then they're not gaming this correctly.
Sam Adams Member	Fri Jun 28 12:11:50 http://x.com/EndWokeness/status/1806673736034074703
Cherub Cow Member	Fri Jun 28 18:29:42 Lol
Rugian Member	Fri Jun 28 19:06:01 The hyenas are starting to turn on him: "The New York Times editorial board called on President Biden to suspend his campaign after his shaky debate performance against former President Trump on Thursday. “The New York Times editorial board called on President Biden to suspend his campaign after his shaky debate performance against former President Trump on Thursday. Mr. Biden has said that he is the candidate with the best chance of taking on this threat of tyranny and defeating it. His argument rests largely on the fact that he beat Mr. Trump in 2020,” the board wrote. “That is no longer a sufficient rationale for why Mr. Biden should be the Democratic nominee this year.” “He struggled to explain what he would accomplish in a second term. He struggled to respond to Mr. Trump’s provocations. He struggled to hold Mr. Trump accountable for his lies, his failures and his chilling plans,” the Times said. “More than once, he struggled to make it to the end of a sentence.” “There is no reason for the party to risk the stability and security of the country by forcing voters to choose between Mr. Trump’s deficiencies and those of Mr. Biden,” the board said." http://the...ditorial-board-biden-drop-out/
Cherub Cow Member	Tue Aug 13 06:24:51 "It’s not an interview when the person asking the questions has endorsed you and is a donor to your campaign." [Jim Sciutto, CNN "journalist", describing the Musk/Trump discussion; August 12th, 2024] http://x.com/jimsciutto/status/1823182447946895446 Ignoring for a moment that Musk explicitly stated that it is not an "interview" but a "conversation", Sciutto's statement is one of those "What if the roles were reversed?" tests that leftists always fail. This is like when Psaki, Comey, and others have described what it "would" be like if the DoJ/FBI were weaponized in a future Trump presidency... and then proceed to describe what they themselves are currently doing. In this case, Sciutto and others at CNN have blatantly revealed their pro-DNC bias and yet get plenty of interviews with DNC officials under the "access journalism" model. The right has begun accepting this reality and avoiding playing into the left's prestige networks. A major failing of previous right-wing candidates is that they would still want to get the CNN interview — they still wanted to impress Regime media, falling into its traps. The problem is that this concession gives the Regime further power and stops the right from realizing what its own objectives should be. For instance, the mass-deportation of unassimilated foreigners becomes a non-starter when a judgmental CNN "journalist" (i.e., Regime apparatchik) frames such positions as "mean" or "cruel" during an interview, causing the right-wing candidate to make concessions with the apparatchik. Such concessions might have made sense when the left was still attempting to "platform" the opposition, but that has long since ended. The direct consequence of the left not "platforming" the right is that the right no longer needs to care about appeasing the foreign subversives of the left — which is to say that leftists, Democrats, and progressives are not actually Americans nor are they Westerners and must now be treated as the foreign agents and traitors that they are.
Rugian Member	Tue Aug 13 08:02:37 CC Clearly you didn't see Vance making the rounds with MSM interviewers this week. And of course, the interviewers treated him with open contempt and hostility. Dana Bash tried to deflect Vance's commenting on Walz's deceptions about his military record by asking him if Trump avoiding military service was shameful. Jonathan Karl tried to gaslight in real time and repeatedly interrupted and argued with him in order to deny Vance's (factual) talking points about Kamala having been the border czar or Walz having signed some questionable LGBT(P) legislation. For anyone who still claims that the media being openly hostile and biased against Trump is due solely to his personality and not his politics, yeah that's absolute bullshit. Vance got the exact same treatment, as would *any* Republican in that position. The media is the enemy of the people and needs to be treated as such.
Cherub Cow Member	Tue Aug 13 09:39:42 [Rugian]: "Clearly you didn't see Vance making the rounds with MSM interviewers this week." Oh, I did. I saw those clips. Jewish Bolshevik Dana Schwartz-Bash tried using these tactics but found Vance hostile and without concessions. Vance was showing this spirit of not appeasing a foreign subversive. It is not a matter of not having the interview at all but of treating it as a hostile interview. Trump did the same when interviewed by Jewish Bolshevik Leslie Stahl on "60 Minutes" in 2020. He knew that "60 Minutes" does hatchet reporting, so he recorded the entire interview and uploaded it unedited, exposing Stahl and taking steam out of the "60 Minutes" propaganda. A major reason that Trump became such an enemy to the Regime is that he would not appease these Bolsheviks; he called them out when they lied.
Cherub Cow Member	Tue Aug 13 10:01:12 A "journalist" appears as a guest on Colbert: "Audience starts cracking up after a serious Stephen Colbert tells CNN’s Kaitlan Collins that CNN “just reports the news as it is.”" http://x.com/CollinRugg/status/1823365884213346613
Rugian Member	Tue Aug 13 10:05:44 Oh you rapscallion you. I notice you have no such descriptive slurs for the filthy Gentile Jonathan Karl. I guess he doesn't fit into your us vs the evil Christ-killing Jews worldview? :)
Cherub Cow Member	Tue Aug 13 10:43:06 He's still a "journalist", so he's spiritually Jewish ;p
Cherub Cow Member	Mon Aug 19 06:08:49 "[Kamala Harris] has always identified as black." http://x.com/WesternLensman/status/1825245958663270456 — Regime journalist Martha Raddatz Oceania had always been at war with Eurasia. The Regime needs Harris to be black, therefore, she has always been black.
Cherub Cow Member	Sun Aug 25 07:36:58 Norm MacDonald meme never misses: After ISIS takes credit for the murder of three Germans at the "Festival of Diversity" (lol) by a Syrian refugee, "journalist" appears to say, "You just really worry about how it could be used by those on the far right to stir up hatred" [August 24th, 2024] http://x.com/Con_Tomlinson/status/1827474878519287815 Story from ABC Chicago: http://abc7chicago.com/solingen-germany-mass-stabbing-stabbings-news/15226427/ "Later in the day, police said they searched a refugee housing complex near the festival area based on a tip and arrested a second person in connection with the stabbing attack." From Independent.UK: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/crime/germany-solingen-stabbing-isis-terrorist-attack-b2601472.html • "German federal prosecutors have taken over the investigation into the atrocity after police and revealed the suspect had surrendered following a major manhunt." • "The suspect, a Syrian man according to Reuters news agency, is said to be affiliated with a home for refugees in Solingen that was raided on Saturday." Yeah. To sebguls, the worst part about a Syrian refugee stabbing three Germans is that — after those three Germans are murdered in cold blood — people might be upset about it. And *that* — that people might be upset about it — is the worst part.
Cherub Cow Member	Mon Sep 16 13:36:41 "Opinion: There is no place in politics for violence. That said, the former president, Donald Trump, brings a lot of this stuff on himself." [Cincinnati Enquirer; September 16th, 2024] http://x.com/Enquirer/status/1835702707505730032 • "Trump brings these assassination attempts on himself | Letters When Donald Trump continues to lie about losing the 2020 election and legal immigrants in Springfield, he brings the crazies out, and one of those crazies tried to shoot him." • "why should the American people continue to put out extra millions for protection that is only needed because the former president can't keep from lying and bringing these issues on himself?" "Former" is in bold in "former president", btw, so this author is another of those "journalists" trying to remove Trump's protective detail so that future attempts will be successful. These people are sick.
Cherub Cow Member	Tue Sep 17 04:40:38 "Why Didn’t Facing a Common Enemy Bring Us Together? "As I ran the National Institutes of Health during the pandemic, I learned that something deep within our culture is wrong." [The Atlantic, Francis S. Collins; September 15th, 2024] http://www...n-public-trust-vaccine/679806/ Highlighted via: http://x.com/cliftonaduncan/status/1835810997157712007 Article paywall can be bypassed by copy&pasting the Atlantic link to this site: https://12ft.io/ Lots of comments to the Twitter post sum up why this is a "journalists" moment (All Journalists Are Bastards (AJAB)). Here's a selection: • "Because the enemy wasn't the virus." • "Why didn’t the entire population obey us? [/] Fixed their headline." • "It did bring together everyone who recognized the common enemy." • "Because the enemy was the deepstate testing how much control they could exert over the populace before a revolt." • "Maybe because of all the goddamned lies and constant gaslighting that we had to navigate??" The same Francis Collins wrote this email in October 2020: ----------- "Hi Tony [Fauci] and Cliff [Lane], See https://gbdeclaration.org/ This proposal from the three fringe epidemiologists who met with the Secretary seems to be getting a lot of attention — and even a co-signature from Nobel Prize winner Mike Leavitt at Stanford. There needs to be a quick and devastating published take down of its premises. I don't see anything like that on line yet — is it underway? Francis ----------- Collins goes on to lie quite a bit in the article, such as in how mask propaganda was handled at first (he ignores that lies were initially told to increase hospital stocks), the "best we can do based on current evidence" lie (whereas they outright shut down contradictory evidence), and a particularly egregious lie here: • "Mixed messages from the White House, including truly outrageous comments from the commander in chief about injecting bleach to treat COVID-19, did not help" This is the "injecting bleach" hoax. Trump did not say that. That is a lie. Collins is revealing his blind partisanship here, which was a major factor in why he was such an abysmally terrible public-health official. Another particularly egregious moment is this false framing after talking about Republicans (supposedly) being more affected by COVID: • "This may be the most consequential example of distrust of science in modern history." Leftists would believe this framing, but it's not "distrust of science" — that is absolutely delusional. This delusion is part and parcel of Fauci's insane "[By attacking me] you are attacking science" line ( http://x.com/townhallcom/status/1402681156953427973 ). That kind of absolute disconnect is still often not understood by these psychosis leftists. They truly think that social engineers and public policy officials *are* "science" itself. They are not. They do not even faithfully *represent* science; they represent their biases first and "science" only if science supports those biases. I've said many times before, but a major problem faced during COVID was that government bureaucracies were completely owned by these left-wing partisans who were acting as inept and malicious social engineers. Leftists have no problem telling "noble lies" because they have no morality and thus there are no limits on their lies. They simply think, "[I want people to do 'this'. Lying achieves 'this', so I will lie.]" This is like the logic of a tired parent trying to get a child to brush his or her teeth — but expanded to *all* human interactions. Leftist social-engineers do not think of the cost of this kind of an approach with adults and with people who actually care to understand the world. This logic only works through compliance, intimidation, penalties, and Machiavellian subversion. As a work metaphor, it is the difference between telling someone to do something versus explaining to that same someone the concept behind an action. It can seem reasonable, especially when dealing with low-IQ and first-order-thinking people, to simply tell them the "do", but the problem with supplying only these short scripts is that this low-IQ person will apply those instructions incorrectly or in unforeseen ways. The Breaking Bad chemical-safe drum episode comes to mind. Walter tells Jessie to dissolve a body with Hydrofluoric Acid (HF), and Jessie thinks he can just pour HF in a bath tub (why bother with a barrel as instructed?), causing the bathtub to fail and creating a large mess. It is only afterwards that Walt explains HF's chemical properties (the "why" behind a chemical-safe drum). The fault here is that Walter thinks he can simply tell Jessie the "do" but not the "why". This theme is carried to the very end of the show when Jessie's final confrontation with Walt is Jessie demanding that Walt stop manipulating him and just say what Walt actually wants and why. This is a particular psychology of people who believe that they can manage others however they see fit (i.e., no matter the immoralism applied): they neglect blowback. The simple consequence of repeated lies is that people will not even believe the liar when the liar decides to tell the truth. It's "boy who cried wolf" on a society-wide scale. But leftist social-engineers and Walt manipulator types have a very low opinion of others and thus see no problem with these manipulation tactics. After all, how many people did the leftist social engineers convince to comply via these lies? The vast majority — and mainly leftists. If you look at someone such as tumblefag, sebgul, or Hrothgar, you can see the absolute victory of this kind of social engineering. These people have abysmal memories (tumblefag in particular) and therefore can be given the latest lie with no worry that previous lies will undermine this new lie through internal contradiction. Liz Cheney is a great example. Anyone who remembers post-9/11 war-mongering knows that no Cheney should be trusted with power ever again, since their lies are told to coral people into terrible outcomes which favor the Cheneys (e.g., war in Iraq to support their business deals). Even the left agreed with this in their propaganda (E.g., the movie "Vice" (2018)). But, tumblefag-types can completely forget this lesson when or if instructed by the Regime and will thus trust a Cheney if it means that the Regime can gain more power. Hence, tumblefag actually trusted that Liz Cheney appearing in the January 6th Show Trials had legitimized it when — to anyone with a memory — it did the opposite. I.e., this lie "works" on these cultist types because they are weak-minded and cannot remember the contradiction (they are not cognizant of their own doublethink). The fact of there being so *many* weak-minded people is why leftists and their social engineers encourage "our democracy": it enhances their ability to social engineer these mental weaklings into mass-compliance. The more compliant the population, the more receptive they are to future lies, future propaganda, and future directives. So these Collins and Fauci types are given a positive feedback loop from this kind of immoral and disastrous social engineering. They believe in convincing *numbers* (itself a left-wing collectivist dogma), and lying is the way to do that given that most people are stupid or compliant like tumbletard, sebgul, or hrothgar. This is why at the close of the article, Collins has wholly failed to learn any kind of lesson. He takes the Regime's talking point, which is to oppose "especially social media" and he hopes to apply this lesson (of shutting down social media) in future manipulations "with the next pandemic, addressing climate change, or defending democratic elections." In other words, he fully intends to lie again for effect, and he hopes that preventing people from calling him on it will increase the measure of his success. Lastly, the lies told during COVID were not even about public health, which is why they are not even truly "*noble* lies". "Noble lies" are inherently evil, so accepting them even a little is a folly (though I selectively excuse parents arguing with their children), but to follow the logic: with a "noble lie", the expectation is that a benevolent outcome will be reached and (perhaps) a proper explanation will be provided after success (e.g., your child brushes his or her teeth and you tell your child later that a monster won't actually eat him or her but also there won't be any cavities). But, because these social engineers believe in purely left-wing outcomes, the entire basis of their "noble lies" is, in reality, West-destroying psychopathy. In one example, COVID outcomes were directed based on "global health equity" — a Marxist position ( http://equityhealthj.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12939-020-01218-z ). Equity in health outcomes — at its core — is based on an oppressor/oppressed dialectic and a racialist strategy (again, Marxism), with prioritization for treatments and other health resources thus depending on helping "oppressed" communities at the direct expense of "oppressor" communities who *funded* these health resources. The concrete result of this was that "minority" communities were prioritized over White communities, and "Global South" nations were prioritized over the West. As a simpler principle, this means that these health officials / social engineers will gladly lie to the public at large in order to redistribute wealth to their client groups. They are thus actively working against the public health interests of White Westerners to facilitate BRICS+ expansion. Even Francis Collins himself, who is White, received a micro-dose of this when he was replaced as Science Advisor to the White House in October 2022 by the Indian Arati Prabhakar. Were he a ruminating sort, it might occur to him that his own sustainability politics necessitated that his voice be removed from the upper echelons of public health policy in favor of BRICS+ nationals. This itself speaks to the wider imperatives here, which were actively pursed through, for instance, a policy manual by Klaus Schwab: "COVID-19: The Great Reset" (2020). References to this work have mostly passed with people's belief that the World Economic Forum (WEF) is no longer a major focus of globalism's tyrannies (out of sight, out of mind), but public health officials directly adopted these WEF policies and incorporated them into their daily lies and social-engineering imperatives. Schwab writes, "Governments must do whatever it takes and spend whatever it costs in the interests of our health and our collective wealth for the economy to recover sustainably" (p44). Schwab is here discussing collectivist Marxist–Marcusean "sustainability" policies regarding "climate change", "global equity", "democracy", and "global governance" (all themes of the book in relation to COVID and health policy). These themes are put in direct competition with nationalism, populism, sovereignty, and Western governance at large (i.e., the villains of their "Great Narrative" and of their overtly globalist plans). These same themes are what Collins references as priorities for his future social engineering (again, Collins: "with the next pandemic, addressing climate change, or defending democratic elections.") In short, social-engineering health officials such as Collins learned nothing positive from COVID. Undermining all of their public health policy was this overtly anti-West anti-White Marxist–Marcusean strategy (I do not use "Marxist" whimsically; it's not even a hidden feature but outright expressed in their citations of the Marxist Marcuse's "sustainability"). While using the mask of public health, there is no lie that they would not tell to effect these underlying policies — policies which spell a direct threat to the survival of the West. They do not see an issue with "public health" policies which advocate for mass migration to the West (a staple of "global health equity") because globalist useful idiots such as Collins simply do not have any sense of national identity or national security — they simply think that a flood of migrants using Western health resources will be "equitable" and thus make these policy recommendations which are subsequently carried out by sustainability czars who have infiltrated the legislatures and bureaucracies of Western nations. I.e., Collins-types are seeded in the bureaucracy to legitimize the managerial state (as the "expert" class), and sustainability czars can then falsify "objectivity" by thoughtlessly passing legislation from the recommendations of these "experts", when, in reality, these "experts" are themselves party apparatchiks who have been cultivated to close this circuit of "expert" to legislature. It simply does not occur to Collins that the reason that there was not some "Independence Day"-movie global unity of narrative was *not* because of some failure of the Regime to establish a monopoly on social-media propaganda. No. There was no unity because his public health policy (the health policy of WEF globalists) is completely at odds with Western values, Western sovereignty, and Western prosperity. His "unity" is with those who wish to destroy the West, and his complaint is only that there are Westerners who do not wish to be annihilated by his treasonous ideology. People are absolutely right to be calling for new Nuremberg Trials for these officials, and these kinds of articles show that these officials will admit to everything without even understanding that what they did was wrong. This is simply the routine behavior of a people without a conscience.
Cherub Cow Member	Sat Sep 21 11:07:56 (Some of this below was re-capped here, but some of the original Tweets have been deleted at this point. https://x.com/_kruptos/status/1837159969914802508 ) A few days ago, a random small account on Twitter that was run by a woman, Rebecca, using her real name, posted a small story about how the Haitian crisis in Ohio caused her to remember a time in college where her older Haitian roommate was so socially oblivious that she would talk on the phone until 3am with the lights on when she (Rebecca) was routinely waking at about 6am for a required team event. This apparently went on for weeks, causing Rebecca some significant sleep deprivation, so she finally told her Haitian roommate, and her roommate showed that she was completely unaware that she had been doing this. The underlying issue here is that there is a massive IQ disparity here that was being revealed, yet this was not even a big deal of a post. ..and yet.. Thomas Williams of the Atlantic reached out to her publicly (since her DMs were closed) multiple times asking for comments with a subtle threat within them: that he's going to call her racist in an article in a major paper, but she can give him a comment for a story he has coming this week if she wants to defend herself. Article appears here: "Elon Musk Is Debasing American Society" [The Atlantic; by Thomas Chatterton Williams; September 20th, 2024] http://www...ter-x-racism-elon-musk/679928/ Selection regarding Rebecca: ------------- I reached out to Christophi to ask if she’d intended her post to be read as invective against Haitians, and she replied in an email that no, it was just “a story,” its telling triggered by “the recent happenings in Springfield”; she “certainly did not expect so many people to see it or to respond with the hatred and vitriol that they did.” She said that people have since threatened her life and livelihood—which of course is egregious. And yet, in her message to me, she also doubled down on what she said were “accurate details about the effect of mass immigration.” If, she wrote, “the details coming out of Springfield are conveyed accurately, they only support my statements, for example, the mayor and city council appear to be receiving financial kickbacks for replacing a third of the population of their town with immigrants.” This is a perfect example of the “Great Replacement” theory in action—the idea that immigrants are being welcomed as part of a plot to steal control of the country away from white voters—and it is not true. There is no evidence that the residents of the town are being in any sense replaced." ------------- Notice the lies, obfuscations, and Party Dogma here. You can't complain about Haitians not being like Americans, and even when a third of an Ohio town is demonstrably made Haitian via DNC-Totalitarian policy, Regime apparatchiks still pretend that the Great Replacement is a "theory" and that no one is being "replaced". This is an old stupidity of the discourse that has to be repeatedly fielded whenever a leftist entertains more than the first part of the Celebration Parallax (more than the "it's not happening" part). They will pretend that being "replaced" can only mean that one item is brought in and another is removed (a very literal and dense understanding). But, of course, this is not exactly the meaning here. "Great Replacement" author Renaud Camus has explained that this is about massively changing a society. You simply cannot bring this many foreigners and pretend that nothing has happened. And on a technical level, this has obvious impacts on voting power (diluting the power of nationals). I stop short because additional reasons are just obvious. People like this journalist simply do not care; they are evil, and they want to annihilate White people and the West. The rest of the article basically just complains about Twitter not belonging to the left anymore (even some complaint about the new blue checks which feels quaint at this point), so the left is less able to get away with mass-blocking the opposition. Remember when WaPo had their ban list that they would constantly report to Twitter to get their opposition removed and they rushed to publicize it to push through a few more bans before Musk fully took over? Yeah. This Atlantic author is one of those kinds of people and was basically banning anyone who responded negatively to his comments. He also tells some egregious lies, e.g., ------------- "Here’s something else that Musk, Trump’s wealthiest and most prominent backer, lamented not long ago: “Racism against white people is the only kind of discrimination that’s allowed.” As the depressing discussions of Haitians—and Jews and Black people in general—have made so inescapably plain, from the top of the Republican ticket down to the most obscure account on X, that is anything but true." ------------- This is obviously false, since X is not some pillar of Regime power, and "discrimination" is not the same thing as making comments you don't like and not getting to have them deleted to save the feelings of leftists. In short, a journalist tried to ruin the life of a random real-name user on Twitter. This user has apparently deleted or hidden her account for the moment following the backlash she received and this smear piece. This is a continuation of the Regime's strategy of attempting to ruin the lives of normal people for not thoughtlessly adopting Regime dogma. You can see how this kind of social pressure could convince weak-minded people (i.e., leftists) to obey these orthodoxies.
murder Member	Sun Sep 22 00:04:24 "Trump brings these assassination attempts on himself." School shootings are just a fact of life. So is people shooting at fat stupid racists.
Sam Adams Member	Wed Oct 02 15:48:46 http://pbs...cAA_AeZ?format=jpg&name=medium Lulz
Cherub Cow Member	Wed Oct 16 03:01:00 [murder (left-wing dogma bot)]: "School shootings are just a fact of life. So is people shooting at fat stupid racists." In case anyone needed further proof that the left is ontologically evil, look no further than murder's pro-a55a55ination comment here. .. This is hilarious: --- "I mentioned the Ferguson and Floyd Effect on CNN... surprisingly, none of the Democrats on the panel had ever heard of it." http://x.com/RyanGirdusky/status/1846406372918702390 "If anyone who I was on the panel with wants to know about the Ferguson or Floyd Effect… here’s where CNN covered it." https://www.cnn.com/2015/10/26/politics/fbi-comey-crime-police/index.html --- In other words, Ryan James Girdusky appears on CNN against a panel of 5 DNC apparatchiks, and not one of the people there has heard of the "Floyd Effect" or "Ferguson Effect", showing that CNN is still early within the Celebration Parallax on this issue. As a reminder, Michael Anton's Celebration Parallax goes, "It's Not Happening, And It's Good That It Is". This is a primary strategy of Regime journalists. They try to keep propaganda in the early stages of the parallax ("it's not happening"), but *if* too much of the public becomes aware of the truth that the Regime has tried to suppress, they *then* proceed to "It's good that it is!". Regime media will even use both states simultaneously, so it's not even necessarily sequential (hence the "and"). In other words, the Regime programs cultists with doublethink to simultaneously claim that "it's not happening" and *if* it's happening then it should be described by the Regime's good terms ("it's a good thing!"). This produces a "parallax" between reality and the cult's acceptance of reality and/or its description of reality. In the case of the Floyd Effect, we have seen both stages of the Celebration Parallax in UP among UP's deranged leftists. Sebfag, for instance, has largely denied that it even exists with his Cirumlocution-Office language ("it's not happening" when it comes to black criminality), and jerfag will cite the effect disingenuously to manipulate its meaning to be Regime-favorable ("it's good that it is"). This is why it's best to ignore sebgul on the issue, since they are merely ignoring its realities and conclusions. For those unfamilair, Steve Sailor on Twitter (@Steve_Sailer) has been a good source on the Floyd/Ferguson Effect for years (e.g., a recent (June 2024) re-cap on the subject, which he has covered since Michael Brown's justified death in 2014 http://x.com/Steve_Sailer/status/1804628416425288061 ). The short version of the Ferguson/Floyd Effect is that following Brown's death due to robbery and attacking a police officer and Floyd's death due to narcotic suicide, the "defund" movement resulted in a massive spike in black deaths in DNC cities. This occurred for many reasons, such as public pressure on police to avoid policing black people (chilling effect), DNC cultists directing the exact same as policy (e.g., Minneapolis protestors vs. Jacob Frey), corrupt DNC judges and prosecutors over-charging police (e.g.; the political persecution and wrongful conviction of Chauvin, who was nearly a55a55inated in prison in late 2023), the removal of funding from police departments, and the re-directing of funding to police departments under the name of DEI initiatives such as "community policing" (e.g.; the explicit policy of Biden's "fund" EOs/initiatives, which actually *funded* "defund" policies in the Party's usual inversion of language). The false (pro-Regime) conclusions drawn for Floyd/Ferguson in the later stages of the Parallax typically go that *anyone* would become more criminal if under-policed, but this denies the cold realities of demographics and crime — which are most often independent of "[muh socioeconomic factors]". The simple reality is that black people are *both* culturally *and* racially more likely to commit crimes, so under-policing them results in significantly more criminality. This took place in the form of black people getting away with reckless driving, resulting in greater traffic fatalities; and black people committing more crime, since the law — which was largely the only thing which made criminality a "bad thing" for them (cf., morality) — would give them a much wider berth. Of the latter, a good example is the "Kia Boys" movement of blacks car-jacking for sport. black criminals found that they could steal Kia cars due to a USB-hack, and they found also that police would not stop them or chase them once a theft was in progress (due to DNC policy). *If* police attempted to pursue, these blacks knew that driving recklessly would abort the pursuit, since, again due to DNC policy, pursuit of dangerous drivers has been coded as dangerous to the public. *If* these blacks were caught later, they would then be safe to re-commit crime because DNC policy meant soft punishments, low bail, and low jail time. The result was a spike in car thefts, high recidivism, and high criminality. And this was just one of many pro-crime DNC policies, others including under-prosecution to falsify conviction rates and gutting police departments to falsify criminal statistics for Marxist "equity". Naturally, the Regime must therefore keep the issue in the early stages of the Parallax. If moderates get to the later stages of the parallax, then they must accept that the DNC is largely controlled by its fringe elements, who insist that crime should be legal. As absurd as that claim might appear to left-centrists and left-denialists (ignorant as they are of the direction of The Party), it is the core reality of the psychosis/cult left. The psychosis-left really do believe the Cult Dogma that punishing crime is itself "fascist", since Marxist "equity" has programmed them to believe the lie that criminality is not race-specific and that if "racial disparities in outcomes" exist in policing then it *must* be due to socioeconomics. Because of this false belief, the very act of punishing a black offender is "fascist" and recognizing black criminality is "racist" and the domain of "Nazis". The result is our current anarcho-tyranny, where lab-abiding White citizens are more likely to be severely prosecuted than criminal blacks because it is easier for the state to prosecute its political enemies than its pro-slave-revolt client groups. The height of absurdity is thus the smug looks of CNN "journalists" (Party apparatchiks) pretending that the Floyd/Ferguson Effect is "made up" while CNN publishes stories about its existence. The Party actively lies in the face of challengers while hoping that the moderate-leftist public remains as ignorant as they feign to be.
Cherub Cow Member	Wed Oct 16 06:15:06 Hilarious video: ---- "Heart-breaking: A student at Rutgers said if she could ask Donald Trump one question, it would be, “Do you see me as a human?” "Just wow. This is why Gen Z is turning out in full force in this election." http://x.com/Victorshi2020/status/1846007149215826176 via AA: "The reaction of the journalist, the fake emotion, the pausing. There are not enough camps." http://x.com/OGRolandRat/status/1846207280510844957 ---- I was lol'ing quite a bit watching this XD And you can see the low-IQ pathos play. This pathos argument is the type of thing that ensnares idiots such as murder and patom. The ingredients are simple: 1) Remind leftist losers of their high school insecurities 2) Attempt to paint a "bully" in the opposition who is totally for real guys being mean to the high school loser version of these leftists 3) Insist that the Regime now needs «carte blanche» to do as it wills on the backs of these pathetic losers — who are just being used and discarded by the Regime since pathetic losers stop existing for the Regime the moment they cast their vote. And from the viewpoint of the pathetic losers, the logic is high school as well: "[Don't break up with me, or I'll kill myself!!]" I.e., "[If you don't recognize trans people, then you're doing a genocide!]" This is, of course, absurd, and this type of emotional blackmail typically stops functioning after 9th grade; but that is why the DNC loves young people and immature retards. This is why they want to reduce the voting age; they have captured this demo of insecure high-school-minded losers (and yes, I know this is technically a college student; it's a matter of maturity). The "journalist", of course, entertains this Salemite thinking, granting the spectral evidence of this delusional person power that it does not deserve. Leftists, of course, are incapable of second-order thinking, so it does not occur to them that the person catering to their sensitivities and childish vices is doing so maliciously.
murder Member	Wed Oct 16 07:06:24 "In case anyone needed further proof that the left is ontologically evil, look no further than murder's pro-a55a55ination comment here." I've literally advocated firebombing or nuking entire populations. I guess it only hurts when it's the big fat spray tan.
Cherub Cow Member	Wed Oct 16 12:12:46 Nope, I've seen that too. You are evil.
	show deleted posts

Your Name:
Your Password:
Your Message: