Utopia Talk - Politics - if this minor war is over

Welcome to the Utopia Forums! Register a new account
The current time is Tue Jun 24 21:52:36 2025

Utopia Talk / Politics / if this minor war is over

Sam Adams
Member Tue Jun 24 09:51:16
Iran has suffered around 1000-2000 military kia, with the complete loss of air defense and air force, the loss of half their ballistic missiles, some of their nuclear ability and most of their top commanders.

Israeli losses: 0 military kia and about 3 scout drones.

Utterly amazing.

murder
Member Tue Jun 24 09:54:53

"with the complete loss of air defense ..."

The ownage was so complete that I'm starting to wonder if they actually had any.

-

TheChildren
Member Tue Jun 24 10:05:46
rofl bs

ur copin

jergul
large member Tue Jun 24 10:19:34
And the fan fiction continues.

Sam Adams
Member Tue Jun 24 10:27:41
Lol jergul's team was slapped so hard jergul wont even let himself look at it anymore.

Lmao

jergul
large member Tue Jun 24 10:40:16
Stop being silly sammy.

A few days ago 74 pieces of Iranian equipment have been visually confirmed as destroyed. Including 44 missile launchers. That was a few days after I said Iran had lost 45 launchers max.

http://www...quipment_losses_so_far_in_the/

A pretty pathetic Pearl Harbour or 9-11 event frankly. Rookie numbers. Like I said they would be.

williamthebastard
Member Tue Jun 24 10:44:57
I wonder what the results would have been if Iran had been receiving trillions in military aid and training from the US for the last 50 years and the US had sent in B52s against Israel. Rather different, I think anyone can agree on.

Dukhat
Member Tue Jun 24 10:45:26
Yet Iran has done barely anything to retaliate. A nation of 90 million can't beat a nation of 10 million.

Sam Adams
Member Tue Jun 24 10:48:03
Lol jergul why did irans ballistic missile fire rate decrease so much?

jergul
large member Tue Jun 24 10:56:52
Iran reduced launches to about 20 a day immediately after the initial barrage. A level tailored to keep Israel more or less under lockdown and can be sustained for quite some time.

The question you should be asking yourself is why did Iran's success rate gradually increase? Somebody was running out of missiles, but it wasnt Iran.

Sam Adams
Member Tue Jun 24 11:15:09
Oh, so iran intentionally stopped firing at israel even when israel was low on interceptors?

Thats your argument?

jergul
large member Tue Jun 24 11:29:40
It fired an initial barrage, then reduced the rate to sustainable levels at about 20 a day. Remember that Israel is a nuisance. The US has the actual threat potential.

This seems to have worked fine and is obviously the best plan.

Still, I will humour the possibility that you might be able to find more than 44 destoyed missile launchers. Knock yourself out.

show deleted posts

Sam Adams Member	Tue Jun 24 09:51:16 Iran has suffered around 1000-2000 military kia, with the complete loss of air defense and air force, the loss of half their ballistic missiles, some of their nuclear ability and most of their top commanders. Israeli losses: 0 military kia and about 3 scout drones. Utterly amazing.
murder Member	Tue Jun 24 09:54:53 "with the complete loss of air defense ..." The ownage was so complete that I'm starting to wonder if they actually had any. -
TheChildren Member	Tue Jun 24 10:05:46 rofl bs ur copin
jergul large member	Tue Jun 24 10:19:34 And the fan fiction continues.
Sam Adams Member	Tue Jun 24 10:27:41 Lol jergul's team was slapped so hard jergul wont even let himself look at it anymore. Lmao
jergul large member	Tue Jun 24 10:40:16 Stop being silly sammy. A few days ago 74 pieces of Iranian equipment have been visually confirmed as destroyed. Including 44 missile launchers. That was a few days after I said Iran had lost 45 launchers max. http://www...quipment_losses_so_far_in_the/ A pretty pathetic Pearl Harbour or 9-11 event frankly. Rookie numbers. Like I said they would be.
williamthebastard Member	Tue Jun 24 10:44:57 I wonder what the results would have been if Iran had been receiving trillions in military aid and training from the US for the last 50 years and the US had sent in B52s against Israel. Rather different, I think anyone can agree on.
Dukhat Member	Tue Jun 24 10:45:26 Yet Iran has done barely anything to retaliate. A nation of 90 million can't beat a nation of 10 million.
Sam Adams Member	Tue Jun 24 10:48:03 Lol jergul why did irans ballistic missile fire rate decrease so much?
jergul large member	Tue Jun 24 10:56:52 Iran reduced launches to about 20 a day immediately after the initial barrage. A level tailored to keep Israel more or less under lockdown and can be sustained for quite some time. The question you should be asking yourself is why did Iran's success rate gradually increase? Somebody was running out of missiles, but it wasnt Iran.
Sam Adams Member	Tue Jun 24 11:15:09 Oh, so iran intentionally stopped firing at israel even when israel was low on interceptors? Thats your argument?
jergul large member	Tue Jun 24 11:29:40 It fired an initial barrage, then reduced the rate to sustainable levels at about 20 a day. Remember that Israel is a nuisance. The US has the actual threat potential. This seems to have worked fine and is obviously the best plan. Still, I will humour the possibility that you might be able to find more than 44 destoyed missile launchers. Knock yourself out.
	show deleted posts

Your Name:
Your Password:
Your Message: