Utopia Talk / Politics / Should Denmark trade Greenland ...

murder rank	Mon Jan 19 06:25:12 For Florida? Trump will do it too. Just think of all the immigrants he could get rid of with just a handshake. :o) -
tumbleweed rank	Mon Jan 19 07:53:39 his Mar-a-lago palace (& classified doc storage) is there he was displaying the entrance door on his feed a few days ago... of interest to the world, i'm sure
murder rank	Mon Jan 19 09:10:51 It was just wishful thinking on my part. Denmark would probably go for Hawaii anyway.
Rugian rank	Mon Jan 19 14:37:19 I've been thinking, the Danes should be establishing a negotiating position that they are willing to sell Greenland to the US...in exchange for the US giving Denmark the entire Eastern Seaboard. A steep trade perhaps, but it is necesssary for Denmark's national security needs. In this Neo-Danish Empire, English will be banned after a five-year transition period. Voting rights will be granted after a 70-year period in which the state has the opportunity to thoroughly instill Danish values into the children of the new citizenry. The Second Amendment would of course be abolished. Mar-a-Lago will be turned into a housing development for Greenland emigres. If Denmark had any balls, this kind of satirical proposal would be a pointed jab at the ridiculousness of Trump's demands. But of course, the Danes have no balls.
Pillz rank	Mon Jan 19 14:49:55 The absurdity of thinking it constitutes a point jab lol That is like a 130lbs antifa soyboi telling an ICE agent if he pepper sprays him he gets to fuck his wife. No basis or bearing in reality and immediately dismissed - ideally with prejudice.
Rugian rank	Mon Jan 19 14:59:09 Pillz The US demand that Denmark surrender Greenland is absurd. Land grabs of this nature do not (normally) happen in the modern international order, much less among nominal allies. Really, the only thing that is justifying Trump's demands is Europe's pathetically weak response to them. Trump may in fact have a point - if Europe's response to a threatened military invasion of its territory is to deploy 30-odd soldiers (some of whom have already been recalled home) and *maybe* cancel a pending trade deal, then they in fact cannot be trusted to stand up against future Russian or Chinese aggression. Europe needs to demonstrate that it has the stones to stand up for itself and NATO when it matters. So far it has wholly failed to do that.
Rugian rank	Mon Jan 19 15:02:38 If any country ever demanded that the US surrender one of our states to them, our response would be a derisive "go fuck yourself." Followed possibly by bombings. The very idea would be treated as laughably stupid. Europe is not acting like it's laughably stupid that we demand to have Denmark. That's a problem in and of itself.
Seb rank	Mon Jan 19 15:17:36 Rugian: Your failure to speak and interpret European responses is your own problem. They treat the threat as deadly serious, not laughable. But they are very clear and couldn't be more clear: it's not going to happen. If the US public, political class and media think it's a big joke and not worth reigning in, they are about to find out the consequence of their own lack of seriousness.
Pillz rank	Mon Jan 19 15:19:23 "The US demand that Denmark surrender Greenland is absurd. Land grabs of this nature do not (normally) happen in the modern international order, much less among nominal allies." 'Modern International Order' is just the enforcement of world order under American Hegemony. 'American Hegemony' being key to understanding why America gets to decide when it's enforced or not. 'Allies' is also a politically correct term you're applying in a contextually inappropriate manner. Europe (both the EU and Denmark specifically) are not 'allies', they're vassals. Your stupid attempts to moralize and intellectualize the situation to fit your arbitrary modern perspective don't matter. "Trump may in fact have a point - if Europe's response to a threatened military invasion of its territory is to deploy 30-odd soldiers (some of whom have already been recalled home) and *maybe* cancel a pending trade deal, then they in fact cannot be trusted to stand up against future Russian or Chinese aggression.' Ty for proving the point I just brought up, as the idea Russia is a threat to Europe is unfounded, and yes, ensuring European wealth and resources belong to America are imperative - China can not be allowed to win a greater foothold in Europe than it already has - and Europe is definitely retarded enough to sell their souls to the east. "Europe needs to demonstrate that it has the stones to stand up for itself and NATO when it matters. So far it has wholly failed to do that." Yes and we need a morbidly obese female-to-male midget to win worlds strongest man to prove women are just as capable as men are???
Pillz rank	Mon Jan 19 15:20:06 Seb is so fucking stupid
Rugian rank	Mon Jan 19 15:45:26 Seb Incorrect. Europe's failure to adequately convey their position in language that the other side can understand (assuming that is indeed their position, which is not a given) is their problem. The headlines from the continent are frankly mind-boggling. "We want to avoid escalation if possible," "We want to find a diplomatic solution," etc. This mealy-mouthed weaksauce is not the language of a continent that is outraged that its territorial integrity has been threatened by an outside power. This is the language of a group setting an opening negotiating position for future discussions in which they are prepared to ultimately offer concessions in the interest of a settlement. I guarantee you that none of these "oh, gee, we find it lamentable that the US are being meanies to Denmark" statements are convincing the White House that they can't get exactly what they want as long as they continue playing hardball.
Forwyn rank	Mon Jan 19 16:45:10 Seb should pray that Trump isn't ingratiated by an Argentinian nationalist with a penchant for praise.
Seb rank	Mon Jan 19 17:47:27 Rugian: Your leader is insane. He's been told publicly and repeatedly Greenland is not for sale and Denmark will forcibly defend itself against any invader. What do you want us to do exactly? Decapitate the US ambassadors to our countries on live TV and FedEx their severed heads to the white house? You elected this fucker, not us. If you attack an Ally, NATO (and US power projection info Africa and the middle east) is over. Your Sigint is over. Your tech industry is over. It will be hell to pay. That's been said. If the only way that cuts through is when all hell breaks loose, because Americans are too degenerate to understand words, then that's what's going to happen. But Europe isn't going to make the first move. It will respond.
Pillz rank	Mon Jan 19 18:02:02 Seb is in full cope mode, like the leftists in Minnesota
Seb rank	Mon Jan 19 18:16:44 Forwyn: Bring it. Absolutely the quickest way to get every American serviceman in the UK lynched by rampaging mobs of right wingers and us rejoining the EU.
Pillz rank	Mon Jan 19 18:58:51 Lol seb really believes that the british are gonna fight Americans over a Danish territory and rejoin the eu You are beyond delusional you fucking crack addicted cuckold loving deviant communist
Habebe rank	Mon Jan 19 19:36:03 Rugian, I'd be ok with that. I'd be curious how the east coast would be under Da ish rule.
Seb rank	Mon Jan 19 21:01:15 Pillz: You see AfD just came out with a statement in response to Trumps Greenland demands calling for a unified European army with nuclear weapons, and ended it "long live Europe".
Pillz rank	Mon Jan 19 21:08:01 And I fully support AfD. But you don't and you want to legislate them out of existence because you fundamentally hate the concept of sovereignty anyways, you sniveling little shit. But coming from you, who kisses his wife after eating out her children's fathers asshole, the cognitive dissonance you exhibit over the topic of an independent and strong European versus a collapsed welfare continent is not surprising.
Pillz rank	Mon Jan 19 21:09:55 Also fail to see how 'AfD opposes trump' = british men are going to beat up american soldiers.
murder rank	Mon Jan 19 21:28:18 "You elected this fucker, not us. If you attack an Ally, NATO (and US power projection info Africa and the middle east) is over. Your Sigint is over. Your tech industry is over." You're wrong Seb, because Europe has very limited capability to project force themselves and has overlapping interests with the US in Africa and the Middle East. Europe would be cutting off it's nose to spite it's face. There's also the issue of colonies that Europe can't defend. Much of Europe will get very angry and hate Americans, and then do what Europe always does ... which is try to make the best deal it can. -
murder rank	Mon Jan 19 21:35:18 If the US ability to project power and sustain force abroad is not crippled, then Donald Trump is going to do whatever he wants until he is removed from power or dies. Everything else is bullshit. -
Pillz rank	Mon Jan 19 21:40:02 American presidents don't just do whatever the fuck they want. They set the stage for what America wants, and whether or not they accomplish it within their term, successive presidents will, and they will consolidate those actions. So whether Trump gets Greenland or Canada or not, in the next 12 years, Greenland, Canada, whatever the fuck else Trump opens his mouth about, America is getting.
Paramount rank	Mon Jan 19 21:47:25 Why would the JewSA trade something for Greenland when they can get it for free. If anyone here knows Trump, please tell him to rename Greenland to New Epstein Island when the ownership has been transitioned.
jergul rank	Mon Jan 19 22:00:30 Pillz I am going to apply my infinite universe aid. Infinite universes branched out from when Trump declared he wanted Greenland. In how many universes did the US end up with Greenland in your mind? As a percentage.
Pillz rank	Mon Jan 19 22:12:08 All of them. For all the reasons listed already by myself, Rugian, Sam, and even murder. But I'm sure Putin will help protect Europe in one of your fantasies
Seb rank	Mon Jan 19 22:29:45 Pillz: What you support is irrelevant, they don't support you. They are explicitly arguing about building weapons to turn *you* to ash. This is the thing you fuckers don't recognise: you are uniting the hard left, the hard right, and the liberal centre against you.
Pillz rank	Mon Jan 19 22:31:00 Lol You're retarded and bad at English and abstraction
Seb rank	Mon Jan 19 22:34:05 "british men are going to beat up american soldiers." For the same reason AfD are suddenly for a United Europe (against the US). Nationalists and nationalists and what they see is an overbearing America shitting on our country for defending an ally. So now America is the enemy, the threat. And if they helped the Argentinians over the Falklands, well put it this way, when I see far right thugs in their thirties they still talk about the Falklands like boomers talk about WW2. So yeah, absolutely, that's what would happen. And not just beating up.
Seb rank	Mon Jan 19 22:36:24 Murder: "You're wrong Seb, because Europe has very limited capability to project force themselves" And why do we care? " and has overlapping interests with the US in Africa and the Middle East." Our interests are to see America bleed itself dry fighting other enemies, and then we asset strip the corpses. Think Iran Iraq war. Or the US after ww1 and 2. And in any case, just like your interests aren't to fuck with Greenland, that won't matter. It will be politically impossible to work with the US.
jergul rank	Mon Jan 19 22:37:39 Pillz Well, in several, a meteor destroys all life on earth within hours of Trump making the statements, so surely not "all of them"?
Seb rank	Mon Jan 19 22:37:43 No pillz, you just missed the point entirely.
Pillz rank	Mon Jan 19 22:41:34 No, you did. Always have. You are dumb in the same way Stevie wonder was blind. Jergul - its late, you need your rest
Sam Adams rank	Mon Jan 19 22:44:58 ”You see AfD just came out with a statement in response to Trumps Greenland demands calling for a unified European army with nuclear weapons, and ended it "long live Europe". " So trump is finally getting you losers to pull your weight in military spending?
Pillz rank	Mon Jan 19 22:46:07 To ally with 'fascists' even
Forwyn rank	Tue Jan 20 02:42:20 Seb wants to recreate Rorke's Drift with his fascist comrades, but as the Zulus
Forwyn rank	Tue Jan 20 02:43:28 - We will seize all American property - We will nuke American cities - We will lynch American soldiers Is this the greatest crashout in UP history? Knowing that Seb hasn't said the word "Greenland" in over a decade? Fucking LOL
Sam Adams rank	Tue Jan 20 04:34:42 Cuckhat melting down last week over some retarded lesbian who brought a car to a gun fight was also hilarious. The minds of weak men don't handle adversity well.
Seb rank	Tue Jan 20 08:32:03 Pillz: The US NSS actively identifies the far right as marginalised oppressed voices it wants to cultivate. But no, I'm not suggesting allying with them you idiot. I'm pointing out when you make a policy preference near universal, it's very likely to get implemented one way or another. Forwyn: You have trouble with verb tenses don't you?
Dukhat rank	Tue Jan 20 09:05:39 Literally this site is just a bunch of frustrated white dudes circle jerking each other as they become more and more far right and terminally online.
Dukhat rank	Tue Jan 20 09:06:33 The funny thing is that the most virulenty demented posters Pillz and Cherub never posted for years and years on u-politics and came from general Being terminally online, they deliberately brainwashed themsleves
jergul rank	Tue Jan 20 09:33:34 Pillz My point is that the absolute certainty you are experience is a religious experience. Absolutes exist only in dogma you see.
Paramount rank	Tue Jan 20 14:01:27 Denmark undermined itself with its anti-Russian propaganda. Their intelligence service, or whatever, wrote in a report that Greenland is under threat from Russia and Russia may take it. Of course, the JewSA is then worried and feel that they must protect it and take it under their own control before Russia does it.
Rugian rank	Tue Jan 20 14:08:43 Trump posted a Photoshopped image of himself in the Oval Office with European leaders, presenting a map of North America with the US flag superimposed over Canada and Greenland. https://tr...Trump/posts/115925888562624963 He also posted an AI image of himself planting thr US flag on Greenland like it's the Moon landing, with Vance and Rubio watching on. https://tr...Trump/posts/115925897257210763
Pillz rank	Tue Jan 20 14:10:25 I'm glad you took a nap, but no.
Rugian rank	Tue Jan 20 14:12:27 Oh and he's screenshotting texts he received from Macron and Rutte. (Rutte was actively glazing him too...pathetic) https://tr...Trump/posts/115925848634299232 https://tr...Trump/posts/115926107400617491
Forwyn rank	Tue Jan 20 15:30:56 "You have trouble with verb tenses don't you?" Lol Seb Too late to play the diplomatic bureaucrat "I'll die happy if I know that you get to watch your friends, family and kids die a slow painful death before you choke on your disintegrating innards from radiation poisoning Sam."
Seb rank	Tue Jan 20 16:17:56 Forwyn: See, you can't tell the difference between the future conditional and future simple.
Pillz rank	Tue Jan 20 16:20:23 Seb obviously not very stable lately. I guess the realization that Europe is beset on all sides, to the east by its energy supplier, to the west by its weapons supplier, to the south by its wife's endless horde of lovers, has finally taken a toll.
Seb rank	Tue Jan 20 16:27:32 Pillz: I often wondered why there's a porn category "interracial", and I've come to realise it's to cater to people like you that have an obvious fetish about race. Normal people don't obsess about race every minute of the day don't think about things this way.
Pillz rank	Tue Jan 20 16:29:37 Normal people ask that question because they're disgusted and offended by the concept Seb asks himself that question because it's all he wants to watch and he can't fathom how it isn't 'just porn' Roflmao
Forwyn rank	Tue Jan 20 16:31:17 "It's just a conditional! I'm only daydreaming about nuking the world over a barren Danish colony! It's only a conditional daydream, I'm not actually crashing out!"
Seb rank	Tue Jan 20 16:52:29 Pillz: Yet you are the one always bringing interracial sex up. Disgust is often a factor in sexual obsession. Forwyn: Not the world. Just the US. Yeah, kinda like fighting WW2 over Poland isn't it. That's why we all praise Halifax and revile Churchill.
Forwyn rank	Tue Jan 20 17:06:01 That time the Brits and Franks tried to slap their dicks on the table, France immediately capitulated, and the UK barely survived by virtue of massive aid and a two-front war? And completely ignored the Soviets doing the same thing? Impotent hypocrisy, yes that sums up the UK
Pillz rank	Tue Jan 20 17:17:45 Very weak, seb. But like CC your incoherence is obvious
Seb rank	Tue Jan 20 19:06:45 Forwyn: Lol. I mean sure, if that makes you feel better. Pillz: Oh I'm utterly coherent, you just can't fathom the idea of anything other than capitulation to the US. Murder is right though, you'd be second class citizens, so maybe your obsession with the idea of sex with the inferior is really desperation you can find a good member of the Ubermensch to take care of your needs?
Pillz rank	Tue Jan 20 19:44:25 You're inability to parse and contextualize my thoughts or beliefs on the matter isn't my problem seb. It is your problem that you can't seem to recognize that a strong independent Europe is incompatible with your ideology and the solution is to embrace the parties, individuals, and rhetoric you categorize as wrong-think and unacceptable. I've preached for a nationalist resurgence (and insurrection) in Europe for over a decade now. If that came to pass as a result of Greenland, I wouldn't oppose it. You would. But the reality is that Europe is dependent on America, and is not in any position to fight it, and a schizophrenic half baked alliance with the 'far-right' and 'nationalists' isn't going to change the reality of the Greenland situation. It is, however, going to finally open up the flood gates to your (re: literally you, personally, as well as your ideological ilk) demise and legitimize the European right. But your smooth brain, which is limited to purely two dimensional thinking, isn't equipped to see the consequences of resistance to America. Nor is it equipped to see the consequences of aquesseance - is is going to be a rise in support for nationalism. Of course in the first scenario (half baked schizophrenic alliance) where you (justly) legitimatize the right, at least there is a transition where you can repent. In the second, you merely accelerate the increasingly hostile political climate until something violent (and just) occurs. At this point you (and your ideological ilk) are not going to be able to transition into a role of penetence. You will be lynched. And anyways, france can't even move an army across the continent for an exercise effectively. The idea that you'd be able to mount any meaningful defense of an island is just purely insane and has no basis or bearing in reality. But you'll continue to live in your retarded little communist thought bubble, convulsing violently as you slowly come to the realization that Europe gamed itself into a position of failure.
Pillz rank	Tue Jan 20 19:55:19 "Murder is right though, you'd be second class citizens," And yet neither of you can define this nor are you aware of the realities of Canadian life or politics. The dismantling of our health care system would be unfortunate but it's already necessary anyways, as it doesn't work either. Or is referring people to euthanasia because treatment can't be secured because of a shortage of doctors a success in your eyes? At least if you die because you can't pay, that's on you. Being told they would rather kill you than schedule treatment in another province is purely a failing of bureaucracy though.
Seb rank	Tue Jan 20 20:31:55 Pillz: It's funny, even as you blather about how I need to align with the far right of Europe, they are adopting exactly the position you say I'm wrong about: Stronger integration through the EU structures, and greater leveraging of the EUs collective economic heft, and disengaging and minimising dependency on the US. I'd oppose those parties, because like you they are absolute fucking idiots, and their damascene conversion to European integration does not come with a recognition that their obsession with race is ridiculous nonsense. But you've missed the point entirely. You don't need to ally with these idiots if they agree with the central thrust. You wrap yourself with the flag and steal the policies they agree with and you win the election on pursuing integration, rearmament and economic disengagement with the US. The more MAGA threatens Europe the less salient other issues become, and the more fascists become discredited by association. They get stuck in a political trap: if they push what's salient they endorse the mainstream positions. If they oppose it, they are unpatriotic which is toxic to their brand. And if they keep banging on about immigrants, they look out of touch and 5th columnists for Trump & co. "But the reality is that Europe is dependent on America" No, it really isn't. It's the other way around. The US relies on constant capital inflows, the majority of which comes from Europe, to sustain itself. The main driver of this inflow is the supposed security of US treasuries. The reality is that joint European borrowing could both cripple the US ability to sustain its economic imbalance while allowing the EU to finance rearmament and anything else it wants to. Meanwhile, there's an annual flow of in excess of 200bn USD per year from Europe in digital and tech services. A very large fraction of this is essentially royalties for use of cloud infrastructure physically based in Europe. A large portion of this fully comoditised and could easily be "onshored" (China successfully did so in a few years), even without just LOLing and international patent law and telling the US to get fucked (cf the US industrial revolution) which honestly I think ought to be an option. (*including using regulatory levers to drive sovereign capacity, either through tech transfer or progressive exclusion of foreign competitors from elements of the value chain, AfD etc. don't have much more of an idea of how to achieve that other than "protectionism").
Seb rank	Tue Jan 20 20:39:14 Basically, like the Suez crisis, Europe with popular support and willingness to bear economic hit could plunge the US economy into a crisis not seen since before WW2. The main thing you and others argue is "European are weak and wouldn't dare", but what you are seeing in the polls is Europeans are way ahead of their leaders on this across all voting demographics. So the pressure is very much going to be to pursue confrontation, particularly as a way to see if populist threats. And in terms of pain, it's similar to the pain of ditching Russian gas. When the threat of Russia was perceived as real and imminent, public support for ditching Russian gas and taking the hit was there. So my point wasn't some politically naive bullshit about an alliance with the fascists, it was about the underlying political dynamics pulling in that direction very strongly. As for military confrontation, if you *do* get the Fascists in govt, they totally will because like Trump they are dumb. WW1 was very obviously a bad idea, but everyone did it anyway because it was easier than not doing it.
Pillz rank	Tue Jan 20 20:51:54 You obviously can't read "I've preached for a nationalist resurgence (and insurrection) in Europe for over a decade now." Never said this was a belief in integrated Europe, nor did I espouse any support for such an idea, nor do the parties I support and you oppose generally seek integration. But you are both stupid and illiterate.
Pillz rank	Tue Jan 20 20:52:22 I didn't read past that, BTW. So you can start over again and make your first sentence not retarded
Pillz rank	Tue Jan 20 20:54:18 I realize the idea of 'eUrOpe' is ever present and the thought of nations working together against a common enemy without sacrificing sovereignty to your unelected technocrats is difficult to comprehend, so you're welcome to take some time.
Seb rank	Tue Jan 20 21:47:11 Pillz: Then you have spectacularly missed the point: all the far right populist parties that have traditionally opposed EU integration are now supporting it as a platform to better confront the US. Far from being "great we can ally with them" the point I was making is quite the opposite. The reason they are flipping on this issue is because populist and mainstream momentum is overtly switching to a demand for govts to confront, resist and oppose the US. But you are far too dumb to understand how all this works.
Sam Adams rank	Tue Jan 20 22:35:34 So Trump's plan to get you to finally pay for your own defense is working? Lol. Hook line and sinker.
pillz rank	Tue Jan 20 23:08:46 "Then you have spectacularly missed the point: all the far right populist parties that have traditionally opposed EU integration are now supporting it as a platform to better confront the US." Im sure this is going to be representative of their stance on the european union as an economic bloc governed by technocrats in Brussels lol
Sam Adams rank	Wed Jan 21 03:39:21 Ya those far rightists who seb wants to jail for being white and speaking are definitely going to fight on sebs behalf. Lmfao.
Rugian rank	Wed Jan 21 13:47:18 Scott Bessent says U.S. is unconcerned by Treasury sell-off over Greenland, calls Denmark ‘irrelevant’ “Denmark’s investment in U.S. Treasury bonds, like Denmark itself, is irrelevant,” U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told reporters at Davos on Wednesday. http://www...mark-greenland-treasuries.html
jergul rank	Wed Jan 21 13:49:03 I know of a country that could sell-off relevant amounts of US assets :).
jergul rank	Wed Jan 21 14:12:51 I checked. The problem for the US is not demand per se as things stand. Less demand simply gives higher interest rates as these things are sold at auction.
Rugian rank	Wed Jan 21 14:18:51 jergul If you want to starve your investment vehicles of risk-free returns, that's your call. The great thing about Treasuries...someone is always willing to buy them.
jergul rank	Wed Jan 21 14:24:07 Ruggy Hardly risk-free. We are a grumply morning exectutive order away from losing control of all investments in the US.
Seb rank	Wed Jan 21 14:46:19 Sam: I don't think you've factored in the quid pro quo: you'll have to pay a lot more for *your* defense and your debt, and your consumption.
Seb rank	Wed Jan 21 14:52:46 Rugian: You say that, but lately when there's turmoil in the markets we see US rates going up and the value of the dollar going down; rather than the reverse. That indicates a lot of the attraction is going. Now there's not much that can replace the dollar at the moment because no major currency issuer is issuing such volume of debt and has enough trade volume for it to be usefully liquid asset. However, rearmament is expensive, as is economic disengagement from the US. The real problem then, for the US, is the combination of ECB backed Eurobonds coupled with a collapse in confidence of US political stability. We have one, and the US is trying really really hard to make the other the only policy option available to European capitals.
Seb rank	Wed Jan 21 18:43:29 So it's Iceland now? Or do you just like having senile people run your country? It's like fucking Russia in the 70s
Sam Adams rank	Wed Jan 21 19:32:07 Settle down there starmer
Paramount rank	Wed Jan 21 21:21:14 In his speech in Davos today Trump said that the US will not take over Greenland by force. So after Denmark sent soldiers to Greenland, Trump is backing down. Trump is afraid. The US could not defeat the Talibans or the Houthis, so how can they defeat the Danes? Trump is choosing to back down and is exposing the US as a paper tiger.
murder rank	Wed Jan 21 21:48:24 He's backed down before. But he's full of shit. He'll come back around to it again whenever he thinks he has the advantage. -
tumbleweed rank	Wed Jan 21 21:49:51 Trump backing off his fully illegal tariffs, & his insane demand to take the territory by any means so no need to impeach, i'm sure he won't do any more illegal & insane shit, as he's done regularly... him of course pretending to have gotten something from the nonsense & harm: " Based upon a very productive meeting that I have had with the Secretary General of NATO, Mark Rutte, we have formed the framework of a future deal with respect to Greenland and, in fact, the entire Arctic Region. This solution, if consummated, will be a great one for the United States of America, and all NATO Nations. Based upon this understanding, I will not be imposing the Tariffs that were scheduled to go into effect on February 1st. Additional discussions are being held concerning The Golden Dome as it pertains to Greenland. Further information will be made available as discussions progress. "
Habebe rank	Wed Jan 21 21:53:53 So anyone check the betting markets? I looked at the ones betting on when we will bomb Iran....not Greenland yet.
murder rank	Wed Jan 21 21:57:42 You figure administration officials are too corrupt to keep from tipping our hand? -
	show deleted posts

Your Name:
Your Password:
Your Message: