Utopia Talk / Politics / Guess the race

Seb rank	Sat Jun 20 19:04:14 https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cx2xg6lwz5jo Four people in hospital after knife attacks in Edinburgh. An arrest made.
Sam Adams rank	Sat Jun 20 21:23:27 Lol. You didn't think there would be pushback against your vile crimes? How dumb are you?
Paramount rank	Sat Jun 20 22:39:44 Sam only approves pushback against crimes if it is his people who push back.
Sam Adams rank	Sat Jun 20 22:45:38 Obviously. Civilized populations have rights that the uncivilized do not have.
Paramount rank	Sat Jun 20 22:54:22 But you are not civilized. Which means that you do not have the rights.
Sam Adams rank	Sat Jun 20 23:07:32 Lol
Cherub Cow rank	Sun Jun 21 00:22:33 --------- "I expect Kier Starmer to come out in the strongest possible terms warning the Muslims against reprisals and offer additional security to churches." http://x.com/Kingbingo_/status/2068403882632315331 --------- Do not look back in anger, seb! ;D [Sam]: "Obviously. Civilized populations have rights that the uncivilized do not have." Correct and nicely put. Subversives will claim that foreigners have the right to brutalize Westerners on Western soil, then they will offer all sorts of protections to make sure that these brutalizations continue and accelerate. They offer no such protection for Western nations/peoples themselves. Whereas, what makes a nation is its people. White Westerners thus must have the lawfully established right and ability to defend their nations from foreigners. In any other time (e.g., pre-2016), it might be worth pointing out that indiscriminate killing of foreigners (if that's what happened here) is misplaced vigilantism, but we know that these subversives and foreigners would make no such argument for the foreigners, who are committing conquest-killings and rapes against White Westerners. In fact, subversives and foreigners *protect* these conquest-killings and *only* offer a wink and a nod to the foreigners by saying that the government is committing these killings on behalf of foreigners and thus foreigners need only be slightly more subtle. Thus, we must recognize that we are in a period of overt warfare. The selective force of vigilantism sometimes lacks proper discrimination (e.g., selecting proper targets that will be understood by the public at large), but White Western patriots know that they are being denied the lawful use of force due to their subverted governments not legitimating this necessary power. Mass-remigration is the moderate and peaceful position, and governments must legitimize it. If two-tier Keir or other traitors continue to evade this necessary legitimization of mass-remigration, vigilantism will have to do while alternate power legitimizes itself. Restore must succeed.
Cherub Cow rank	Sun Jun 21 04:03:33 Starmer made his typical anti-White "full force of the law" line, lulz http://x.com/Keir_Starmer/status/2068420853042217360
Cherub Cow rank	Sun Jun 21 20:51:17 In these troubling times, we should caution Starmer to be steadfast in his commitment to process. He is inciting violence and public discord. Similarly, we should consider other very important points here: http://x.com/45Jacobite/status/2068646515405447394 • This man was clearly just mentally ill. That does not mean he should not have been on the streets because asylums must remain closed, but it does mean that we should excuse his stabbing. The mentally ill should be released from Arkham, given fear toxin, and allowed to obey the voices. • Don't look back in anger • This was an isolated incident. Violence is always isolated to the violence. • The root cause is poverty, not policy • It's the system, not this man's culture. • The services must be fixed. If this man had had more services available, he would not have done anything. • This was not a hate crime. This was just random violence. • White people should be protected from any reprisals. • Do not jeopardize the trial by making claims about the legality of stabbing, who was stabbed, how many times they were stabbed, why they were stabbed, or what the stabbings looked like. In fact, isolate yourself from all information and try to know as little as possible about this event. • Stabbings are just a part of living in a big city.
Cherub Cow rank	Mon Jun 22 06:06:43 ------- "Instantly publishing CCTV too. We never see this when Whites are victims of muslims or blacks." http://x.com/RusGarbageHuman/status/2068740196636484089 ------- This is part of that "you do not start describing perpetrators" logic (actual "journalist" quotation from 2023: http://x.com/thelaymanstake/status/1729447008039993637 ), where, for instance, Rudakubana's horrific deeds were largely censored from the public until *after* he was sentenced, even when it was clear that it was an explicit anti-White attack to facilitate White genocide (most information having to come from citizen journalism before that). The Régime thus tells the lie that the public should "not jeopardize the trial" — but only for the foreigner. They do not want the perpetrators described — *if* it is a foreigner. They want "community cohesion" — *if* it is a foreigner. For the foreigner, they even comb social media to ban and report all visuals of the suspect as well as any claims of the race of the suspect (even if true!), and they send officers to the homes of any UK White person who makes "racist" comments about that suspect. Whereas, for White people, they want no cohesion. Starmer thus pushes for immediate "full force of the law" and definitively and without a quiet ("don't jeopardize the trial!") investigation says that it's "anti-Muslim hatred" ( http://x.com/Keir_Starmer/status/2068420853042217360 ), Régime media themselves publish material showing the suspect (BBC: http://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c8j21zvkd20o ), and foreigners embedded in governance such as Humza Yousaf explicitly say that they want *no* "statements of solidarity" but instead want specific reprisals on behalf of Muslims ( http://x.com/HumzaYousaf/status/2068431309735620934 ). The Régime will demonstrate all of these two-tier tactics and simultaneously say that this is "equal protection under the law" (e.g., Lammy's heavily qualified lie http://x.com/implausibleblog/status/2063557964120658167 ). They speak out of both sides of their mouth — many such cases.
Seb rank	Mon Jun 22 08:09:14 NaMBLA: " didn't think there would be pushback against your vile crimes?" Wasn't that Bin Laden's line? The logic of terrorists transcends their ideologies.
Sam Adams rank	Mon Jun 22 08:16:03 neville you could use that argument against anything. Didn't hitler breathe air. Why do you breath air. Lol dumbass An argument stands on its own merit, not cause an asshole did or did not do it.
Seb rank	Mon Jun 22 08:58:38 NaMBLA: Yeah, but you did occupy the holy places of Islam and you did prop up a foreign proxy govt. The issue of merit is that they decided to kill a bunch of innocent civilians. Which is what you justify. Or are you just saying "It's fine when my buddies burn kids in houses, but when they do it, it's evil".
Sam Adams rank	Mon Jun 22 10:37:30 They are allowed to go home without harm. Which is much more than you can say about all the people you helped your migrants rape and kill.
Seb rank	Mon Jun 22 14:37:21 Why lie when it's in your own post?
williamthebastard rank	Mon Jun 22 14:41:33 Thats like asking the snake why it bit you
Cherub Cow rank	Mon Jun 22 17:30:23 [Seb]: "The logic of terrorists ... decided to kill a bunch of innocent civilians" Seb's divisive language in this thread cannot be tolerated, and the full force of the law must therefore arrive at his door with printed pages of his thoughtcrimes. We cannot look back in anger. We should not say that this man was a "terrorist"; please do not jeopardize the trial with your racism, seb. This man was simply having a mental health episode because he did not have access to enough services. This was just random violence, which is a normal part of a multi-English society. Do not blame Sam or his people for the actions of this one individual whose politics cannot be used to infer anything about him or his actions; the worst thing about this attack is that it might be used to justify anti-White hatred. This was truly a unique moment of an individual being an individual. Process is key here! We must trust that the process will prevail regardless of thoughts of Goodness. Whatever that process is, we must have it and more of it! Hence, if process means that a moon-faced Paki midget must question seb about the greatest crime to have occurred regarding this event (seb's racist claims of terrorism upon "innocent civilians"), then that is the process that must be followed. If seb is to get 10 years in jail for his racist comment while this poor man having a mental health episode only gets several months of community service, then that is simply the process. The full weight of the process must prevail!
	show deleted posts

Your Name:
Your Password:
Your Message: