Utopia Talk / Politics / trumps "speech"

williamthebastard rank	Fri Jul 17 11:07:30 So now we know he's planning - once again - to steal the election. US patriots - if such a thing exists - need to start preparing to take back their country by force.
williamthebastard rank	Fri Jul 17 11:09:48 "He's only rigging the election because Twitter banned him, so its all Obamas fault" - Lying Pedophile
murder rank	Fri Jul 17 12:40:45 Apparently election security is Doomed! -
Average Ameriacn rank	Fri Jul 17 15:06:16 Some people say it was the best presidential speech ever. Trump is now bigger than Reagan, Kennedy and Linculn.
Im better then you rank	Fri Jul 17 18:58:19 In a sane world they would 25th amendment his ass.
williamthebastard rank	Fri Jul 17 19:12:35 In a sane country, he never would have got within 50 miles of the WH
murder rank	Fri Jul 17 19:29:48 "In a sane country, he never would have got within 50 miles of the WH" The first time. In a sane country he would have never gotten out of ADX Florence supermax prison after the insurrection. Or Alcatraz since he is so fond of it. -
Hrothgar rank	Fri Jul 17 23:49:42 2016 Trump wins - Democrat in the presidency, elections were not rigged! 2020 Trump loses - HE is the president. Elections are rigged, despite Republican control leading up to the election. 2024 Trump wins - Democrat in the presidency, elections were no longer rigged! lol
Dukhat rank	Sat Jul 18 03:40:52 None of the usual conservative crowd is here. He repeats the same kind of bullshit they post every day. Its too easy to realize how stupid that all of them are reading the same dumb fuck online sources and then repeating the same dumb fuck things. Well, of course they’ll just come back to repost far right nonsense tomorrow. The addiction is too strong.
Rugian rank	Sat Jul 18 20:37:06 Victory! ----- A federal appeals court on Friday allowed the U.S. Postal Service (USPS) to move forward with proposed changes to its mail-in ballot delivery procedures while legal challenges continue, but the Trump administration rule remains stalled under a separate court order. A three-judge panel for the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals unanimously halted a lower court order that blocked the Postal Service from restricting delivery of mail-in and absentee ballots that don’t provide eligible voter lists to the federal government. The panel found that the Postal Service made a “strong showing that they will likely succeed” in their arguments that the proposed rule was “neither constitutionally nor prudentially ripe for review” and that it fell outside the scope of a settlement agreement previously reached with the NAACP. The judges also ruled USPS demonstrated it would suffer “irreparable harm” if unable to finalize and implement the rule by the November midterms, writing that there “can be no do over” once the election occurs. Postmaster General David Steiner confirmed earlier this month that the agency would not deliver mail-in ballots in states that refuse to hand over sensitive voter data to the Trump administration, telling lawmakers it was meant to ensure the “right ballots are going to the right people.” The changes stem from a March executive order that directed USPS to propose a final rule by August 3 doing just that. The NAACP sued in late June, arguing that the proposal violates a December 2021 settlement agreement that required the Postal Service to “prioritize monitoring and timely delivery of election mail” through the 2028 elections. District Judge Emmet G. Sullivan agreed, finding earlier in July that Trump’s order was “designed to exert federal control over who in the United States may be sent a mail-in or absentee ballot in federal elections by the Postal Service.” Friday’s appeals court ruling is a temporary victory for the Trump administration, which has sought to restrict a practice that President Trump and his allies often blame for voter fraud despite a lack of supporting evidence. But the president’s executive order remains blocked in nearly two dozen states due to a Boston-based federal judge’s ruling late last month. District Court Judge Indira Talwani found that the directive infringed on states’ constitutional authority to regulate the administration of elections and that efforts to remove individuals from voter rolls were unconstitutional. https://th...stration-usps-mail-in-ballots/
Rugian rank	Sat Jul 18 20:37:42 In all seriousness, I hope there's a better legal argument against this proposed rule than that NAACP bullshit. That's a genuinely weak argument.
	show deleted posts

Your Name:
Your Password:
Your Message: