Utopia Talk / Politics / Grok ‘Odyssey’ by end of year

murder rank	Wed Jul 22 14:42:43 Elon Musk Says Grok Will Make an AI ‘Odyssey’ Film That Is ‘Historically Accurate’ by the End of the Year Elon Musk has — finally — broken his silence on “The Odyssey” (well, at least since Christopher Nolan’s epic was released and started breaking various box office records). The tech mogul and recently-crowned trillionaire — who spent some time before the film’s launch rallying against various casting decisions — wrote on his social media platform X that his AI tool Grok Imagine would make a “historically accurate” full-length feature version of Homer’s ancient Greek poem. He noted that his AI “The Odyssey” would be ready by the end of 2026 (just in time for awards season). “Before this year ends, Grok Imagine will make a full-length movie of The Odyssey that is historically accurate and true to the art of Homer,” he posted, together with an AI-generated 3-minute short of “The Odyssey” posted by an X user. Given the presence of cyclops, six-headed monsters and a witch who turns sailors into pigs in “The Odyssey,” a nearly 2,800 year old epic considered to be a work of fiction, how “historically accurate” any retelling — AI generated or otherwise — can be is likely to be called into question. Presumably, Musk is referring to the racial element, with him having been the most prominent voice attacking the casting of Lupita Nyong’o as Helen of Troy. In March he wrote that “Chris Nolan is an anti-White racist,” claiming that he only cast Nyong’o because “He wants the awards.” While not confirmed, the all-white AI cast of the short film he posted on X would appear to be more in line with what Musk would prefer. Musk had also supporting transphobic posts about Elliot Page, who many initially asserted was playing Achilles. Page was later confirmed as playing Sinon. For all Musk’s complaints about “The Odyssey” before its release, the movie has been nothing short of a triumphant success for Universal and appears destined to become Nolan’s highest-grossing film to date. The film earned a massive $264 million in its worldwide opening weekend and looks set to continue its own box office odyssey into the coming weeks. https://va...torically-accurate-1236817856/
TheChildren rank	Wed Jul 22 15:36:05 oh nos...some black person had role in some movies where they omitted greek peoples while pretendin 2 be greeks and shit rofl
Habebe rank	Wed Jul 22 16:50:17 I mean, if they made a harriet tubman movie starring jennifer aniston....there would be q shir storm.
williamthebastard rank	Wed Jul 22 17:14:23 Listen, you racist, whiny, historically illiterate fool who imagines white people are the real victims of Black racism. Any individual, regardless of race, can be racist toward another individual. That's so obvious only a child would think it's some profound discovery. Individual prejudice can harm people, but it rarely threatens an entire society. Thats why the state rarely interferes in such matters. The greater danger comes when the dominant, ethnically homogeneous group in a country has the power to discriminate, oppress, enslave, or persecute other groups over generations. In the United States, that dominant group has a long history of systemic anti-Black racism - from slavery through segregation and beyond. That is why the state and all research is more concerned about the dominant, historically genocidal racist group than the much weaker group that doesnt have such a history. Now off you go and whine about how unfairly blacks have treated and enslaved the white dominant group in the USA for centuries, you fucking weakling, waaaaa waaaaaaa
williamthebastard rank	Wed Jul 22 17:19:44 Murcan racism is currently a threat to among many people mexicans in Murca. But mexican racism towards Murcans is not anywhere near the same level of state enforced racism. The fact that a mexican might be racist towards a murcan individual is nothing close to that level. Is anything breaking through the voices in your implanted transmitter?
williamthebastard rank	Wed Jul 22 17:27:23 Now that the white homogeny in Murca is becoming the minority, this may change in the future. Currently, the white homogeny continues to maintain their power domination, but this may change in the coming decades. If it does, and the black majority starts to use legal, governmental and social power to harm the white group the way they were harmed - then you will have a case.
Sam Adams rank	Wed Jul 22 21:50:39 It is important to stop antiwhite racism now. It is already rampant and state sponsored. It is the natural evolution of the jealousy in the minds of the less successful peoples... And wherever leftists establish power anti white racism and antisemitism becomes the law. Look at the UK, where an antiwhite 2 tier policing system is already encoded into law. Look at Canada or a far left city like Boston or NYC or Seattle where it's not possible for a white man to get a government job.
williamthebastard rank	Wed Jul 22 22:04:32 Unreadable, CC-level junk. So lets let AI read it for us: williamthebastard 1. Anyone can be racist. This is well supported. Nearly all mainstream definitions of interpersonal racism allow members of any group to hold racial prejudice against members of another. 2. Society should focus more on racism by dominant groups because they possess greater institutional power. This is a defensible social-science argument. Much research distinguishes between * interpersonal racism * institutional/systemic racism because institutions can affect millions of people through laws, policing, housing, education and employment. Historically in the United States, white Americans held the overwhelming majority of political and institutional power for centuries. That made anti-Black racism particularly consequential. So this argument has substantial historical support. 3. "The state rarely interferes in individual racism." This is partly true. Governments generally do not criminalize private prejudice itself. However they often regulate discriminatory actions: * employment * housing * education * public accommodation * hate crimes * harassment So the wording is too broad. 4. "...dominant, historically genocidal racist group" This is also partly true. A stronger formulation would be: Historically, institutions controlled primarily by white Americans enforced slavery, segregation and discriminatory policies. That is historically precise. Mexican example The distinction is basically correct. Anti-American prejudice by Mexican individuals can exist. But historically there has not been a Mexican-controlled American state systematically discriminating against white Americans. The comparison between interpersonal and institutional racism is therefore reasonable. Future demographic point If Blacks become the dominant political majority and use institutions to discriminate against whites... This is a logically consistent hypothetical. It recognizes that institutional racism depends on who controls institutions rather than treating one race as permanently incapable of exercising power. Whether such a scenario is likely is another question. Sam Adams This post contains several empirical claims. Claim: "Antiwhite racism is already rampant and state sponsored." This is not supported by mainstream evidence. There are examples of anti-white discrimination or hostility. But describing it as "rampant" and "state sponsored" requires substantial evidence that is generally lacking. Claim: "Wherever leftists establish power antiwhite racism becomes law." Again, there is no evidence for such a universal claim. Many left-of-center governments (for example in Scandinavia or Western Europe) have anti-discrimination laws protecting all racial groups, including whites. Claim: UK has anti-white two-tier policing encoded into law. There is no law in the UK that establishes different criminal penalties based on race for white versus non-white defendants. Critics often refer to: * hate crime guidance, * sentencing guidelines, * diversity policies, but those are not equivalent to race-specific criminal laws. So "encoded into law" is inaccurate. Claim: White men cannot get government jobs in Boston, NYC or Seattle. This is factually false. White men continue to occupy many government positions in all of those cities. Diversity initiatives exist. That is not the same thing as a legal prohibition on hiring white men. Overall quality of arguments williamthebastard Good Makes a valid distinction between interpersonal and institutional racism, but should refer to institutions rather than "white people". Sam Adams Weak Contains multiple sweeping factual claims that are unsupported or false as stated.
williamthebastard rank	Wed Jul 22 22:06:27 AI's conclusion: Lying Pedophile is lying. As always.
williamthebastard rank	Wed Jul 22 22:13:10 Should have included the quote: "Strongest argument in this thread The strongest substantive issue raised in the thread is the distinction between individual racism and institutional/systemic racism. That distinction is widely recognized in sociology, history, and law."
Sam Adams rank	Wed Jul 22 22:46:02 "Unreadable, CC-level junk. So lets let AI read it for us: " Lol. Amazing.
williamthebastard rank	Wed Jul 22 22:46:45 "compare and rate williamthebastards points to sam adams points As arguments, they are not particularly close in quality. Logical structure williamthebastard 8.5/10 Sam Adams 2/10 williamthebastard (...) This is a coherent argument. Sam Adams (...) Sam Adams' argument is much weaker because it makes several sweeping empirical claims without evidence. (...) This would require substantial evidence, yet none is offered. (...) This is demonstrably false. Difference in reasoning The biggest difference is methodological. williamthebastard starts with an observable historical pattern. From that, he derives a general principle. Whether one agrees with every implication, the reasoning is internally coherent. Sam Adams instead starts with a conclusion, and then asserts examples that are either unsupported or factually inaccurate. Overall, as an argument grounded in history and social science, williamthebastard's position is decidedly stronger than Sam Adams'
williamthebastard rank	Wed Jul 22 22:48:13 is one of these 2 users more concerned with factual and historical points? Yes. Based on these posts alone, williamthebastard appears much more concerned with grounding his position in historical and factual claims, even though his delivery is highly confrontational. Sam Adams Sam Adams' post is built almost entirely around broad assertions: (...) These are all empirical claims, but none are supported with evidence, and several are either demonstrably false as stated or so sweeping that they would require exceptionally strong evidence.
williamthebastard rank	Wed Jul 22 22:49:09 If the question is "Which poster appears more interested in whether their claims correspond to historical and factual reality?", the evidence from these posts clearly points toward williamthebastard.
tumbleweed rank	Wed Jul 22 23:15:40 Helen was birthed from an egg after her mother had sex w/ a swan...
	show deleted posts

Your Name:
Your Password:
Your Message: