Utopia Talk - Politics

Welcome to the Utopia Forums! Register a new account
The current time is Thu Jul 30 05:38:47 UTC 2026

Utopia Talk / Politics / fauci

Sam Adams
rank Thu Jul 30 00:08:30
When asked questions by congress.

He invoked his 5th amendment rights 111 separate times.

Lmfao what a fucking retard. How shady was the dem response to COVID? I thought most of that was just right wing conspiracy theories but now... It looks pretty fucking shady with this.

tumbleweed
rank Thu Jul 30 00:20:12
they went after Comey for perjury over 1 half of an answer he gave (w/ no explanation of their evidence)

they're trying to go after Jack Smith for perjury over 1 answer he gave (w/ seemingly weak evidence)

Fauci absolutely should assume was entirely meant as a perjury trap since the 'party' is so openly blatantly corruptly going after MAGA/Trump boogeymen

Sam Adams
rank Thu Jul 30 00:30:12
This guy is supposed to be a leading scientist. Present evidence and argue your case like a man.

1 dodge is bad enough.

111 different 5th amendment dodges makes this guy guilty as sin beyond any reasonable doubt. That's 1 corrupt dodge for every year that bilbo baggins has been alive.

tumbleweed
rank Thu Jul 30 01:09:30
he was asked the color of the carpet & his tie... he didn't selectively pick out 111 questions to not answer, it was his stance on all

tumbleweed
rank Thu Jul 30 01:15:51
there would've been a 100% chance of Trump posting that Fauci lied under oath (while citing nothing, as -always-)

as he does -every- time a foe testifies

& his DOJ already shown to be corruptly charging off the lord's wishes (w/ his loyal henchman crazily close to being confirmed as AG)

jergul
rank Thu Jul 30 03:58:26
Dummy, he avoided entrapment. Dont you get that your government is corrupt and will use any means to hunt down imaginary foes?

So guilable.

Hrothgar
rank Thu Jul 30 03:59:45
When being trolled by retards, why pander to them? Probably the smartest thing he could do sitting in a pointless Trumpist propaganda hive.

Probably got the idea from Trump:

"During an August 2022 deposition with the New York Attorney General's office (part of the civil fraud investigation into the Trump Organization), Trump invoked the Fifth Amendment repeatedly. Reporting converged on a figure in the low-to-mid 400s — NBC and several outlets reported "more than 440" or "nearly 450" times, while The Guardian and others described video footage showing roughly "400 times." A source with knowledge of the deposition told NBC News he pleaded the Fifth more than 440 times, and his attorney said the only question he actually answered was about his name.

The New York Attorney General's office confirmed the invocation but didn't provide an official numerical total, which is why the exact count varies slightly by outlet (400, "more than 400," "more than 440," "nearly 450") depending on whether they were citing a source or reviewing the released video.

For context, this wasn't unique to him — his sons Eric Trump and former Trump Organization CFO Allen Weisselberg each invoked the Fifth over 500 times in related 2020 depositions."

tumbleweed
rank Thu Jul 30 04:48:39
one of the questions
"To what extent were you involved in sabotaging hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin..."

6 years later, there's zero indication these treat covid...

good question, Senator!

Sam Adams
rank Thu Jul 30 04:59:15
a good answer to that would be "since there was no evidence those worked, I obviously did not support them".

Pleading the fifth makes you look guilty.

"Trump invoked the Fifth Amendment repeatedly"

Trump is obviously a shady motherfucker. Not exactly the guy a chief scientist should be emulating.

tumbleweed
rank Thu Jul 30 05:30:57
pleading the fifth to some questions while answering others makes you look more guilty... he answered no questions

it's not a good look, but this admin already shown willing to charge without any good evidence of a crime

the criminal referral shitbag Jim Jordan put in for Jack Smith perjury is nonsense, as likely is the Comey one (but they don't even state their evidence so hard to judge it)... whereas when Jack Smith charged Trump, extremely detailed evidence provided (& wasn't refuted, just ignored)

show deleted posts

Sam Adams rank	Thu Jul 30 00:08:30 When asked questions by congress. He invoked his 5th amendment rights 111 separate times. Lmfao what a fucking retard. How shady was the dem response to COVID? I thought most of that was just right wing conspiracy theories but now... It looks pretty fucking shady with this.
tumbleweed rank	Thu Jul 30 00:20:12 they went after Comey for perjury over 1 half of an answer he gave (w/ no explanation of their evidence) they're trying to go after Jack Smith for perjury over 1 answer he gave (w/ seemingly weak evidence) Fauci absolutely should assume was entirely meant as a perjury trap since the 'party' is so openly blatantly corruptly going after MAGA/Trump boogeymen
Sam Adams rank	Thu Jul 30 00:30:12 This guy is supposed to be a leading scientist. Present evidence and argue your case like a man. 1 dodge is bad enough. 111 different 5th amendment dodges makes this guy guilty as sin beyond any reasonable doubt. That's 1 corrupt dodge for every year that bilbo baggins has been alive.
tumbleweed rank	Thu Jul 30 01:09:30 he was asked the color of the carpet & his tie... he didn't selectively pick out 111 questions to not answer, it was his stance on all
tumbleweed rank	Thu Jul 30 01:15:51 there would've been a 100% chance of Trump posting that Fauci lied under oath (while citing nothing, as -always-) as he does -every- time a foe testifies & his DOJ already shown to be corruptly charging off the lord's wishes (w/ his loyal henchman crazily close to being confirmed as AG)
jergul rank	Thu Jul 30 03:58:26 Dummy, he avoided entrapment. Dont you get that your government is corrupt and will use any means to hunt down imaginary foes? So guilable.
Hrothgar rank	Thu Jul 30 03:59:45 When being trolled by retards, why pander to them? Probably the smartest thing he could do sitting in a pointless Trumpist propaganda hive. Probably got the idea from Trump: "During an August 2022 deposition with the New York Attorney General's office (part of the civil fraud investigation into the Trump Organization), Trump invoked the Fifth Amendment repeatedly. Reporting converged on a figure in the low-to-mid 400s — NBC and several outlets reported "more than 440" or "nearly 450" times, while The Guardian and others described video footage showing roughly "400 times." A source with knowledge of the deposition told NBC News he pleaded the Fifth more than 440 times, and his attorney said the only question he actually answered was about his name. The New York Attorney General's office confirmed the invocation but didn't provide an official numerical total, which is why the exact count varies slightly by outlet (400, "more than 400," "more than 440," "nearly 450") depending on whether they were citing a source or reviewing the released video. For context, this wasn't unique to him — his sons Eric Trump and former Trump Organization CFO Allen Weisselberg each invoked the Fifth over 500 times in related 2020 depositions."
tumbleweed rank	Thu Jul 30 04:48:39 one of the questions "To what extent were you involved in sabotaging hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin..." 6 years later, there's zero indication these treat covid... good question, Senator!
Sam Adams rank	Thu Jul 30 04:59:15 a good answer to that would be "since there was no evidence those worked, I obviously did not support them". Pleading the fifth makes you look guilty. "Trump invoked the Fifth Amendment repeatedly" Trump is obviously a shady motherfucker. Not exactly the guy a chief scientist should be emulating.
tumbleweed rank	Thu Jul 30 05:30:57 pleading the fifth to some questions while answering others makes you look more guilty... he answered no questions it's not a good look, but this admin already shown willing to charge without any good evidence of a crime the criminal referral shitbag Jim Jordan put in for Jack Smith perjury is nonsense, as likely is the Comey one (but they don't even state their evidence so hard to judge it)... whereas when Jack Smith charged Trump, extremely detailed evidence provided (& wasn't refuted, just ignored)
	show deleted posts

Your Name:
Your Password:
Your Message: