
Welcome to the Utopia Forums! Register a new account
The current time is Sun Sep 27 05:41:14 UTC 2026
Utopia Talk / Politics / Starship orbital flight Sep 28 @ 8:15am
|
murder
rank | Sat Sep 26 11:23:32 https://www.rocketlaunch.live/?filter=starship-bfr They are going to try to complete a full orbit this time and deploy a real orbital payload. I'm not sure if they are going to try to catch this Starship. - |
|
jergul
rank | Sat Sep 26 12:03:03 Not going to deploy a real orbital payload. Starlink V3s have an ultralow LEO path to point were solar array is optimized to minimize drag. Source: your link and some clicking on links there. |
|
Sam Adams
rank | Sat Sep 26 21:02:02 What is this retarded baboon trying to say? That low earth ORBIT isn't orbit? Baboon dumb. |
|
jergul
rank | Sat Sep 26 23:03:20 Dummy, your ignorance is not a badge of honour. Secondly, an orbit so low that you have to design satelittes to reduce drag is not a "real orbital payload". Pseudo orbital perhaps as the starlink v3 lumber themselves slowly into higher positions they still need drag reducing features for. You are so dumb. Rofl. Pwnd! |
|
jergul
rank | Sat Sep 26 23:06:20 Dummy: "me car be orbiting earth. I kno cuz me hedin west for duh must part" Lol. Reked! |
|
Sam Adams
rank | Sun Sep 27 00:50:39 ^baboons should not try to think about spaceships. Doesn't work. |
|
jergul
rank | Sun Sep 27 03:42:46 Dummy, you are not an authority on this or on anything. "Real orbital payload" means lifting something into a stable orbit. The v3s are most definitely not being lifted into stable orbit by the starship, or by their own power for that matter. Ketamin man is using the term to distinguish from the last flight. 350 km altitude is very low. Lower than the international space station. Congratz. That is like Sputnik-5 levels of success in 1960. Except without that live payload that returned to earth successfully. Is anything in this flight going to return successfully? Rolf. Pwnd! |
|
Sam Adams
rank | Sun Sep 27 04:39:27 Lol. Jergul: space baboon. |
|
jergul
rank | Sun Sep 27 04:42:30 Lol. Dummy: functionally illiterate dunner-kruger manifestation. Rofl. Reked! |
|
jergul
rank | Sun Sep 27 04:45:27 My bad. Let me translate for you. Dummy be too dumb to know he is dumb. Rofl. GG dummy! |
|
Sam Adams
rank | Sun Sep 27 04:51:20 Perhaps you can reason this through your baboon mind... Probably not but maybe you can save yourself a lot of embarrassment if you ponder why an internet satellite might be designed to orbit as low as possible. |
|
jergul
rank | Sun Sep 27 05:03:20 dummydumbdumd being dumb. What a surprise. Rofl. Maybe eat more fish? Red herrings do not give your brain what it needs. The point in question, dummy, is the limited capability the starship is demonstrating. Russia did the same thing better in 1960. 350 km is neither impressive, nor a "real orbital payload" It is an orbital height that naturally decays fast due to drag from the atmosphere. Like less than 6 months fast. |
| show deleted posts |