Utopia Talk / Politics / The jewish Question (Thread #1 of 110)

Cherub Cow rank	Mon Jan 19 20:45:58 The jew is the enemy of mankind and seeks to enslave the world. Let us examine the nature of the jew so that we might answer the question of millennia.
Cherub Cow rank	Mon Jan 19 20:46:09 "Inside the New York Town Invaded by Welfare-Addicted Jews..." [Tyler Oliveira; January 15th, 2026] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nd17ZGaoZ58
Cherub Cow rank	Mon Jan 19 21:08:36 "Attorney General Pam Bondi, after being introduced by Miriam Adelson, tells the Israeli-American Council how the DOJ is working for them by suing anti-Israel protesters under the FACE Act for "the first time," and extracting giant "anti-Semitism" settlements out of universities." http://x.com/infolibnews/status/2013033776675230034 The jew tells the lie of "anti-Semitism" and "hate speech" so that their slaves will consider them sacred and inviolable. jewish slaves will use the FACE act to protect the jew, but will we see prosecutions against the jewish bioweapons who stormed a Church yesterday? Perhaps. Even then, we must ask why it is that the jew is protected while White people are systematically murdered by jewish golems.
murder rank	Mon Jan 19 21:13:57 So what do you propose for a final solution? -
Pillz rank	Mon Jan 19 21:18:44 Elect AfD in Germany and give them a few decades. Germans could finally do something good for humanity using their innate irresistible urge to destroy. Dunno why we stopped them early last time. Once the Germans are done we exterminate the Germans. With neither Jews nor Germans, humanity can enter into a prosperous new era and beat back the eastern hordes.
Cherub Cow rank	Mon Jan 19 22:06:30 [murfag]: "So what do you propose for a final solution?" Indeed we will also discuss how jewish programming has made mindless people such as yourself immediately believe that any talk of the jew must necessarily accelerate to thought-terminating clichés. Notable, of course, is that totalitarian thought reform's use of thought-terminating clichés began with the jew. Their one god is Memnoch the Devil, and it is his nature to devour the world; this is a totalizing mantra which birthed totalitarianism itself. And why would the jew's thought reform matter for we Free Westerners? We in the West believe in the separation of state and synagogue, do we not? The values of the jew should not dictate our own futures. [pillz]: "Once the Germans are done we exterminate the Germans." Why would you subjugate Noble Germany thusly? With leftists disenfranchised in Germany, perhaps they could recover the losses inflicted upon them by the international jewish Bolsheviks. It was, after all, Germanic tribes who cleansed Rome when the jew destroyed Rome with "multiculturalism". If the jew survives your scenario, who could renew the world again? Perhaps many others fighters could emerge as we know that fighters today exist outside of Germany, but certainly it makes no sense to deprive ourselves of those who resist the jew's totalitarian designs. Ultra-Violence is our Great Gift to the world, which ever looms should the world need to be cleansed of enslavers. .... "Daniel Schueftan, Israeli security expert - Jung & Naiv: Episode 377" [September 2018] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VNTM_xmFdZE (Daniel Schueftan is a jewish advisor to the "Israeli" security council. He spends his time game-boarding jewish global imperatives.) Here we see a repeat of a common jewish theme (particularly after 1:45:00): the jew, when not concerned with performing ideological consistency for his slaves, will outright tell you what he thinks of the formation of collectives. (We see the same theme in the jewish work "Dialectic of Enlightenment" (1947), wherein the jew strategized how to defeat the remaining West following Germany's defeat at the hands of the international Bolshevik jews). The jew denies all collectivism for the enemies that he seeks to destroy, hence, the jew encourages "Global South" collectives, and White collectives are discouraged today in the same way that German collectives were discouraged before WWI. Germany was considered by the jew to be too defiant of jewish international Bolshevism — they were at that time the most unwilling to be enslaved, thus the jew eroded their nation with "multiculturalism", and, when Sacred Germany's living imperative reasserted itself, the jew used their infiltration of world governance to turn the world against Germany. The jew thus evaluates enemies as Schueftan illustrates concisely within about ten minutes: if the result of a particular people coming together as a collective is that this people opposes jewish messianic totalitarianism, then the jew considers them an evil that must be destroyed. The criteria of this are very simple: • Do these people accept enslavement to the jew or not? • Will these people destroy the jew's greater enemies or not? If a people does not accept jewish enslavement, then at some point the jew intends to destroy them. But, if the jew has greater enemies, then these people will be manipulated into killing the jew's greater enemies. When this people invariably displaces the jew's greater enemies to become one of the jew's top rivals, then they too will be destroyed by the next greater of the jew's enemies. This is the jewish cycle of annihilation which occurs whenever jews gain power (i.e., this is the jew's own collectivized nature: global genocide, global enslavement). Some call this the "Fourth Turning" in a pretense that it is a natural development of any society, whereas this is a development only of societies infiltrated by the jew; the "Turning" does not occur in the absence of the jew. In the video, Schueftan only specifically identifies the Irish and the Swedish as particular *Western* enemies when it comes to this criteria of defiance when collectivized (around 1:57:00), but this is a limitation of their discussion going in other directions rather than being a complete list. (Note that of the non-Western enemies he, of course, lists Middle Eastern enemies not favorable to the jew: Iran, Syria, and the other nations that these United States have attacked on behalf of the jew.) What is interesting is thus that he spoke of this in 2018, and we see how the jewish plan of "sustainability" has captured those nations since this time, with Sweden ranking 4th in the world as having governance infiltration favorable to the jew and Ireland ranking at 9th per worldeconomics (an accredited ESG ranking agency). Most of the Nordic nations were targeted for "sustainability" likely because *if* collectivized they could resist the jew, but sustainability has eroded their ability to do so. These nations (the nations top-in-the-world for jewish "sustainability") are now all run by jewish slaves, with the general populace being propagandized to oppose the rise of any Right-wing faction that could save them. The capture of these nations by jews has, of course, resulted in mass-migration from the "Global South" to liquidate Western collectivization. We see the same strategy playing out in all Western nations under the management of the jew, with Minneapolis being a pertinent city-level example in the news of late. Minneapolis, is, of course, managed by the jewish Bolshevik Jacob Frey, who is leading a coalition of "Global South" slaves in a slave revolt in morality against White Americans. Much of the jew's displeasure with ICE comes from this desire to end White collectivization in these United States by forcing the lie of "multiculturalism", since, as their slogan goes, "Diversity is [the jew's] strength". In short, the theme of collectivization is one that shows which direction jewish schemes of world genocide are going. The lesson that jewish agitprop of the 20th century enforced upon the minds of their boomer slaves was that "never again" meant that no White people could every collectivize again because "[muh holly, muh shoah]". The absurdity of this cannot be overstated. In the Frankfurt School of the 1940s, jews had already decided that the entire White West was their next project for genocide and liquidation, and they were already speaking about it purely from a logistical standpoint (i.e., in terms of infiltration and the time required for subversion). While German women and children were still being raped by their slave armies from the East, they were planning how to make slave armies that would destroy these United States and England. They did not care that White Westerners from these United States or England had "saved" the jews from a "shoah" because the jew sees no distinction between a White German and a White American; all are to them their "Edom" (enemy that must be destroyed). The concept of giving "thanks" to those who "saved" them is not a part of their dogma because they believe that it is the nature of their slaves to serve them as masters.
Pillz rank	Mon Jan 19 22:16:22 2/10 ragebait A valiant effort, though. But Germans are a blight on this earth. They did not save Rome. They ruined it. And they ruined Christianity. And they ruined philosophy. And they ruined the social contract. If you think Germans saved Rome from Jews, you really have fallen too far. But why don't you offer a single other example of Germans contributing something of note to civilization, besides gnawing away at it every opportunity they get
Pillz rank	Mon Jan 19 22:26:43 Germans never had the benefit of cultural enrichment that other barbarians had. They've no foundation beneath them but that which they destroyed Rome with. Godless, moralless animals in the bodies of humans, who seek just to destroy whatever structure stand before them, out of a fear of loss of their so-called individuality. Never before in human history has a people so clearly lacked an internal compass as the Germans. Nothing is natural to them except the need to ruin what they find or are given. Every other people in Europe can be characterized by their culture, traditions, the spirit of their pasts. Germans just have autism and a need to poison and dismantle.
Cherub Cow rank	Mon Jan 19 22:40:14 [pillz (probable faggot)]: "But Germans are a blight on this earth." Very faggoty and not worth obliterating such an unsubstantiated opinion in more than a paragraph or two: the world has long known that the German is an excellent pairing of mind and heart, hence for centuries it is Germans who were contracted when any project of liberty needed to be begun in the West. The American project itself courted Germans to its shores since as a simple fact of historical reality they were the most likely to champion the earning of liberty through their Good Works and the most likely to fight for these ends. In the early history of these United States, England and these United States both sought to attract Germans to their causes for this recognition of their Great Gift of Ultra-Violence and their Great Nature towards liberty. Even today these United States possess a heavy contribution within its White ancestry via Germans. So your faggoty attempt to distort this flies in the face of history and is best left for whatever degenerate acts one must assume that you were falling into while you were supposed to be obliterating the falsehoods of millennia. Even your faggoty comment about Rome is some low-IQ agnosia which fails to reconcile the stages of Rome and the facts of its multicultural fall. If removed from your pathetic fall into ego, could you even realize that were these United States to become a brown horde of Somalians and Mexicans, that Germans annihilating these brown peoples would indeed be a renewal? Would that truth hurt your ego as well? "Saved Rome from Jews"! Laughable misrepresentation akin to the faggotry of sebgul. This thread will march on despite the musings of the ignorant. ........ "Sam Harris: Right-wing conspiracy theorists—including Elon Musk—think Jews pushed open borders/mass immigration. Judea Pearl: "We were the arrowhead pressing for open borders ... that's true."" http://x.com/infolibnews/status/2012321889046196601 We see here an example of how the jew manages himself with the Celebration Parallax ("That's not happening and it's good that it is!"). The jewish Sam Harris holds the early position in the Parallax, claiming that it is merely "conspiracy theory" that jews pushed for mass-immigration to the West ("It's not happening"), while a more honest jew tells Harris that, actually, yes, "that's true"; the jew was indeed behind the push for mass-immigration to the West ("it's good that it is [happening]!"). This strategy of forcing multiculturalism upon the West is the jew's fantasy of messianic totalitarianism. There are several levels to this messianic totalitarianism from a genetic standpoint, since the jew wears phenotypes as masks from generation to generation (a shapeshifting theme which has emerged in many stories which have told of the nature of the jew for centuries), but the jew intends to rule a kind of Tower of Babel where the world squabbles and can get nothing done within their own factions while the jew rules as the enslaver of a mindless rabble. This is, again, their Anti-Christ goal for the world. Thus, from one standpoint, the jew uses multiculturalism to create what the jew Kalergi called "the race of the future" (a brown bio-mass with no history, no memory, no distinct people; fictionally described as Nietzsche's "Last Man" (first appeared in Nietzsche around 1883) and described shortly afterwards by H. G. Wells as "Eloi" in "The Time Machine" (1895)). A people with no history can be enslaved by the jew if the jew is able to retain his own history. Thus, the jew endlessly deconstructs the histories of all of the world's tribes while claiming that he invented all religion, whereas, in truth, the jew is a plagiarist of mankind. The jew is only a vehicle towards parasitism and power, hence he will tell any lie of his history if it grants him a narrative to enslave the world. This is also what Orwell described in "1984". Notable, of course, is that 1984 was not about Germany but about jewish Bolshevism. All of the processes that Orwell described of this totalitarian government were sampled from jewish imperatives. Winston's job as a destroyer and falsifier of history is how the jew destroys the histories of those it seeks to enslave (which is everyone). We see today that the jew deconstructs the history of the White West the same as he deconstructs the history of Palestine: he does this not from truth but to destroy by falsifying a narrative which justifies annihilation. We must take a moment then to realize that the West's narratives are antithetical to this devil-worshipper narrative. A common theme of the West is to make all peoples of the world un-enslaveable and to hold their histories (as their futures) in their own hands. The jew opposes this. The West breeds defiance. The jew breeds subservience. The tragedy is that in Celebration Parallax the jew openly tells us all of this, but many people, bred or propagandized to be slaves, have simply chosen to accept it.
Pillz rank	Mon Jan 19 22:44:59 Its amusing you think I read your entire post. But my points stand, and you are now exposed as a Germanic whore, fueled not by some epistemological or deontological necessity, but by the urge to break things (and murder Jews)
Cherub Cow rank	Mon Jan 19 23:20:16 [pillz]: "But my points stand, and you are now exposed as a Germanic whore, fueled not by some epistemological or deontological necessity, but by the urge to break things (and murder Jews)" Flagrant and pathetic lies. Your enslavers have programmed you with clichés. [pillz]: "Its amusing you think I read your entire post." Oh, I know that you don't, and I have given no indication here or anywhere that I think otherwise. I have pointed out many times that the slavish will fail to read when they see that their worldview is falling apart. With the most slavish of slaves such as murderfag, tumbletard, sebgul, and williamthebitchfag, this means that they hardly read anything at all. With the less slavish, they will read unless it prosecutes their enslavers, hence Rugian and Sam are suddenly mute on the issue of the jew. You, being a slave on this same hierarchy of self-imposed enslavement, have met your own pet stupidities wherein you off-load your intellect with willful ignorance. I do not write any of this for the pathetic; this is Lightning for those who at least must know that there is an elephant in the room and that they are indeed pathetic for ignoring it, as you are indeed pathetic. This is your conscience tapping you on the shoulder and reminding you that you are a slave and that your ignorance cannot save you from the obliteration that you yourself invite. .......... "Batya Ungar-Sargon: "Only 13% [of Democrats] stand with Israelis against the Palestinians…" "The thing that makes this so appalling is that Jews built the left in this country. We built the labor movement. We wrote the New Deal. 70% of the lawyers who worked on civil rights cases were Jews!" "We've been at the forefront of every liberal and leftist issue in this country!"" [October 28th, 2025] http://x.com/infolibnews/status/1983156803652276506 Here we see another Celebration Parallax moment. For years people have warned the slavish that it is the jew directing this latest (post-2016) slave revolt in morality — as the jew has directed many in the past. This too was dismissed in the "That's not happening" phase of the Parallax. Yet, here we see the jewish Batya Ungar-Sargon proudly proclaiming that this is indeed the case: that jews are at the forefront of slave revolts in the West. And what further evidence must we publish of this fact? An easy place to start would be with the jewish Bolshevik's scheme of "sustainability", which I detailed already in the totalitarians threads but will re-state for the topic: "Sustainability" itself was hatched by the jewish Bolshevik Herbert Marcuse, pushed in the jewish-captured United Nations, formalized in 2004 by jewish asset managers, and pushed in 2008 by the jewish banking scheme wherein jewish bankers (e.g., the jewish-run Lehman Brothers, the jewish-run Bear Stearns) made millions off the collapse of global economies and then "punished" themselves by awarding themselves millions in retirement bonuses and by giving themselves exclusive control of further global economics via, for instance, "Dodd–Frank". Naturally, 2008's Dodd–Frank itself was drafted largely by the jewish Barney Frank, this being similar to the Hart–Celler Act being drafted by the jewish Emanuel Celler (this act opening these United States to foreigners under a "multiculturalism" scheme; one of the single greatest treasons in the history of this nation). Hence, jews caused the problem and then "solved it" by giving themselves more power. And who profited most greatly from Dodd–Frank? Well, the jewish Larry Fink, of course! The jewish Larry Fink's BlackRock just happened to be best positioned to handle the fallout from the collapse of jewish banks, and his scheme just happened to expand control for further jewish asset management. Most unabashedly, Larry Fink's office was called "Little Israel" because it was so thoroughly dominated by jewish bankers. What a proper coincidence! It surely must be because they were denied access to the guilds! Following BlackRock's empowerment under post-2008 "reforms", asset managers had a blank check with which to propagandize the world. All studios no longer had to care about merely slipping-in their agitprop; all of their losses were protected such that jewish morality could be their primary thematic element with no attempt at even entertaining the narratives of Western morality, which was freely deconstructed by resentful nihilists, further provoking a slave revolt. Some (e.g., Tim Pool) have suggested that Occupy Wall Street was derailed via the manufacturing of a slave revolt (the manufacturing of "woke"), but this is not the true chronology. It is true that Occupy Wall Street brought the full attention of left and right populists to the issue of the asset managers, but "woke" had already been manufactured well in advance of these protests. The 2008 collapse merely gave the asset managers more power to fund what they had already been seeding in the universities (e.g., paid protestors, dysgenic leftists given narrative weapons). At any rate, the jewish "sustainability" scheme quickly became an obvious anti-competitive pyramid scheme and protection racket, with any adopters of the scheme "rewarded" with investments *if* their projects supported jewish totalitarianism, and any non-adopters punished through protection racket behaviors such as the liquidation of their boards, forced non-involvement of all adopters, and heavy regulations from jewish-owned regulators. And why did this issue of overt illegality not achieve the attention of the SEC? Why, because the SEC was run by the jewish Gary Gensler, who refused to look at any litigation against the jewish Larry Fink's anti-competitive practices. What Fortune! And when these issues were raised in Congress, who defended this anti-competitive scheme? Well, of course it was defended by a coalition of Democrats, a third of whom were jewish (5 of the 15 defenders of ESG were jewish — what are the odds!). In other words: • 2004 start of ESG begun by jewish asset managers • 2008 collapse caused by jewish asset managers • post-2008 regulations favor jewish asset managers • post-2008 agitprop heavily favors a jewish-led slave revolt in morality • post-2008 criminal activities by jews protected by jews in regulatory agencies • post-2008 bypasses to the regulatory agencies guarded against by a majority of jewish representatives The slave revolt in morality we have experienced most sharply post-2016 ("woke") was funded by jewish asset managers and coordinated and sustained by jews in positions of power. These are undeniable facts, and jews themselves admit that these facts are true. Nevertheless, the slaves of the Celebration Parallax fear that they do not have permission to name their own enslavers.
Pillz rank	Mon Jan 19 23:37:22 Hollow words, repeated into your lonely little void, because you've long since lost the ability to think properly. A tragedy, really, but when handicapped by a feminine mind as you are, it is to be expected. It must be harrowing to know that your ancestors accomplished nothing in almost two millenia except to erode everything Europe has ever built, be it through war or through poisoning intellectualism for the sake of being edgy. You fight not for righteous justice, but because you are driven by the cancerous imperative to tear down anything you envy and replace it with something disastrous. This is, of course, the subconscious motive for your entire 15 years of political and social commentary. It is not that western civilization is worth championing, or the truth worth exposing. These are lies you tell yourself, to self soothe and find solace in some imagined place amongst your civilized peers. But the truth is, if you'd been born a decade earlier, you'd probably be in Minnesota right now yelling at ICE agents.
Cherub Cow rank	Mon Jan 19 23:48:48 [pillz]: "Hollow words, repeated into your lonely little void, because you've long since lost the ability to think properly." Zero substance projection. You are just another slavish leftist. Pathetic. [pillz]: "It must be harrowing to know that your ancestors accomplished nothing" You don't know who my ancestors were, though in your low-IQ stupor you seem to think that I am wholly German. Retarded attempt at inductive reasoning, shitfag. "[Erm, CC is saying true things about the Germans. CC must be German. I am very smrt. Smrt smrt smrt.]" — Fucking retard [pillz]: "You fight not for righteous justice, but because you are driven by the cancerous imperative to tear down anything you envy and replace it with something disastrous." Nope. That's jewish slave morality. Obvious projection and inversion of any of my meanings; I have never elucidated any such disastrous thinking. I have consistently celebrated the West's Glorious Traditions from a specifically American perspective. I wish to tear down nothing but the foreign idols of the "Global South" that were built only recently in scorn to the West. [pillz]: "But the truth is, if you'd been born a decade earlier, you'd probably be in Minnesota right now yelling at ICE agents." Zero foundation for this in any reasoned understanding. I was posting about Ayn Rand in high school, so you haven't got a fucking clue. You have nothing. You're just like williamthebitchfag trying to obstruct. • Hrothfag did the same thing when I started a thread on election litigation. • Duckfaggot did the same when I started talking about Biden's dementia in a thread series on totalitarians • williamthecoward did the same with the Border Treason threads You're just being a disingenuous leftist. It's not convincing. It's pathetic. Grow up.
Cherub Cow rank	Tue Jan 20 01:17:03 We can see a good example here of how the jew Andrew Goldstein deconstructs White identity to effect White genocide: [clipped moment] [December 31st, 2025] http://x.com/f4tr3t4rd/status/2006608207326883889 Full episode here: "I Confront Britain's Biggest RAC*ST" [Andrew Gold; December 29th, 2025] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GSuXaBpGlA4 Andrew Goldstein employs a series of notable subversions in this podcast, which, honestly, would take a day to fully list. The very intro is a subversion meant to inform the audience of how to perceive the information, as is common in jewish agitprop (see, for instance, the jewish-hosted and jewish-produced show "60 Minutes", which always narrativizes and deceives with editing). One notable element is something I remarked on a video that clipped the interview: ------------- •"run the clock down" Exactly! They do this constantly. Once you notice it you cannot not notice it, particularly because it is not just limited to in-person debates. The strategy is to keep the conversation from being productive (in any media, including social media and even plain-text Internet forums). It's part of the Celebration Parallax ("That's not happening and it's good that it is!"). They argue both positions simultaneously, but they prefer to keep you in the first position ("It's not happening"). This keeps you from recognizing that there is even a problem for long enough that you are black-pilled into their later position of "It's too late anyways." If they can delay the debate within this zone, then no productive thought can occur. Whereas, if you are not spending more time considering the solutions to the reality, then your own solutions may remain underdeveloped and ineffective. You must move past the delays of deceivers. For in-person debates, this would potentially mean moving forward with your position "as a hypothetical" even as they continue to deny the reality. -------------- This is particularly notable given pillz' meltdowns above and the catalogue of similar obstructions from UP's leftists. These sorts of distractions are designed to impede thought — not explore truth or consider futures. Subversives and disrupters will attempt to stop the Right from even proceeding with the debates on their steel-man terms because they fear a conclusion of which they would not approve. In the case of the intent of this thread, I am currently laying out the facts of the jewish question so that we may understand in later posts how world leaders are contributing to the issue (i.e., aiding the jew), working around the issue (e.g., with parallel societies and non-intervention), facing the issue (e.g., mainstreaming the issue), or dis-empowering the jew (e.g., eroding international support for the jew). Senseless disruptors want none of these issues examined, hence, they do not even want the facts available to facilitate further examination. This is part of the "final solution" propaganda which the propagandized accept (erroneously) as the only solution to the Question. That is, the propagandized assume that anyone speaking of the jewish Question necessarily must want jewish genocide, but this is outright false and even quite stupid. This is a conditioned response from totalitarian thought reform. We will ignore it in these threads. In the case of Goldstein's positions and his own strategy of running down the clock, he has to deconstruct White identity because if people do not even know what White people *are* then the Bolshevik plan of genociding them may continue; the debate can go nowhere. This same strategy is employed with Palestinians and even with women. Palestinians need little explanation, but as a quick note, the jew says that there has never been a Palestinian state because the jew means to destroy the Palestinian state. It is a simple rhetorical deception (an occult self-fulfilling prophecy). In the case of women, Matt Walsh's mock-umentary "What is a Woman?" ironically broaches this point, but the deeper implication is part of a civilization-destroying method: if women themselves are deconstructed, then they too will cease to exist. This is where we must realize the actual scheme, however: the jew is not talking about "women" in general anymore than corrupt UK politicians are concerned with "men" committing rapes when truly it is specifically Pakistani men and various imported foreigners committing the majority of rapes. That is, when the jew deconstructs "women", it is as a means specifically to deconstruct White women. This fact is made available to us through the obvious double standards of the rhetoric (i.e., *who* is deconstructed and *who* is *not*). It is White women who are deconstructed as "birthing persons", LGBTQ2S+, and various inventions. Meanwhile, the same people using these inverted terms will openly discuss the women of the Global South without any issue of definition or deconstruction ailing them. Thus, the women of the Global South will improve Western birth rates, but the White women of the West do not even exist and never have. It is genocidal rhetoric. On the same route, I explain this to a user in the comments shortly after the video aired: --------- You have to understand what's beneath his words. • When he says, "Unfortunately," he does not mean the word itself. His tone is pure apathy and even mockery and gloating. He has this same tone of scoffing repeatedly in his interactions here, especially his frequent interruptions of "Yah, yah." • When he says, "I count myself among them", he is playing a deception. He knows that he is not White, and he knows that his real people will not go extinct. He knows that his people will hide among the new hosts; it is only his White genetics that will be shed. You can tell this fact because in this same interview he deconstructs White identity to be meaningless. He is pretending to be something that he is also pretending does not exist. It is a deception via duplicity. • When he says, "At some point," he is invoking a self-fulfilling prophecy. A person who cannot see your people in the future means to make a future where you do not exist. • When he says that he means some thousand years in the future, it is because he noticed that the near future was shocking, so he is adjusting to try to ease White people into the warm bath of obliteration. He means to destroy White people but wishes that White people would not notice so that they will not fight back. All of these things are available if you pay attention to his facial expression and tone. Regarding self-fulfilling prophecies, this is a common tactic with psychopaths of his type. If they can get you to adopt their vision of the future, then you, as the mark, will pursue the psychopath's vision. The vision is psychopathic because the outcome is your obliteration. Psychopaths playing with these occult self-fulfilling prophecies will hide behind words such as "inevitable", because they are determinists trying to enslave you to their twisted futures. --------- We can see through Goldstein's series of deceptions here to arrive at these firm premises. He claims to be "White" but deconstructs "White" to be meaningless, so he truly does not find himself to be White. In separate admissions he admits that he is indeed jewish above all, and in a separate admission he claims that jews were everywhere before anyone else. This last point is of crucial significance since it speaks to the jew's delusional and international character. If the jew believes that the presence of a single jew in a nation at any point in its history means that jews have a claim to that nation forever, then we see their psychopathy (this is an absurd way of making a claim; it is similar to the claims made by children claiming chairs) and we see their megalomaniacal nature (that they believe that they own the entire world the moment that they touch it with their narcissism). Neither position is defensible from a Western framework (neither psychopathy nor narcissism), but we must recognize these operating principles within the jew. Thus, emergent in the way that the jew Goldstein handled this debate is in what it means for the jewish position. We see above with Schueftan that the jew believes that White people should never be allowed to collectivize (in any nation at all). So the punishment of White people by the jew was not to stop with the punishment of Germany during and after the World Wars; it was a punishment of all White people for the "crime" of their very existence with Germany being a stepping stone for this goal. On a generational level, we can see that the consequence of this ideology is outright genocide by killing and/or genocide via miscegenation (the jew Kalergi's "race of the future"). Hence, Goldstein believes in the jewish position, which is that White people will go extinct. We know further that this extinction is not a mere natural consequence of civilization but an intentional subversion and a direction that is forced by the jew. It is, after all, jews who push for mass-immigration by their own words (e.g., Judea Pearl's statement above). From a rhetorical standpoint, it is a deterministic and materialistic fallacy to believe that the natural consequence of humanity is total and homogenized miscegenation, since humans are not particles dispersed in solution but rather are behavioral beings capable of preferential regulation (e.g., borders between peoples). It is only in an enslaver's fantasy that all peoples except for one's own are dispersed particles without souls while the enslaver alone is distinct, exceptional, and "Chosen". It is, conversely, the West's tradition that all peoples of the world can remain unique while uplifting themselves to become more conscious, more en-souled, more distinct, and more exceptional among themselves by their own values, traditions, and beliefs in a total end to all international enslavement schemes. So we see again how the West is at odds with jewish slave morality. Their formula would make all of humanity into beings without consciousness (the perfect slaves) while our formula would result in every individual in the world having a mind worth absolutely protecting and capable of self-protection as a sovereign (perfectly un-enslaveable). It is this rift and the jew's global messianic totalitarian ambitions which provoke them to genocide White people. A people who insists that the world be composed entirely of slaves will cull those who resist such an enslavement. Thus, we will need to discuss factions within the jew who oppose or support these schemes of global enslavement. Were we to adopt Schueftan's own premise that a people, when collectivized, reveals their nature, then we might conclude that it is the nature of the jew (in general) to enslave other peoples and create subservient animals. But, we must also recognize the sickness in Schueftan's way of thinking. For instance, we know also that it is jewish international policy for a people to be eroded from within via the appointment of slavish leftists into positions of power. Does this arrangement not change the character of the collective? Certainly it does, though we admit also that this is foreign meddling. Schueftan admits this peripherally in his talk of different collectives which display differing degrees of difficulty for the jew. He speaks in particular of Syria and how the natural state of those people is that their leaders must be dictators, since Syria as a nation cannot keep its collective together without that form of leadership. His belief is that Syria must be brutal or else Syria will dissolve. Further, since Syria is brutal and is against the jew, he says that there is no circumstance where Syrians can collectivize while allowing the jew to survive, hence Syria is a jewish enemy in Schueftan's absolute sense; he does not even think that Regime change could ever work. As a pragmatist, he indicates that this means that Syria has been selected by the jew for total extermination. Can we ask this question of collectivization of the jew? That is, what is the structure of jewish internationalism which defines its character? Can its character be changed through leadership? Is there a Regime change which could alter this character? We see already that there are many issues which no jewish leader should support if they are to remain in the West or remain enfranchised. jewish genocide schemes, for instance, are intolerable to the world. No jew should believe that any jew or all jews are "Chosen", since this is a belief which can only propagate enslavement. The list could easily be expanded to reject money-lending / usury, deception as a political practice, social-engineering, totalitarianism, communism, wealth redistribution from one ethnicity to any other ethnicity (e.g., taxation which is designed to take from productive members and give to the non-productive). Could these be abolished and still allow the jew to thrive? We see also that Heinlein's solution has been largely rejected by the oligarchs of the jewish diaspora-collective. Heinlein realized that a silver bullet would be that no one can hold the franchise without earning it through difficult service. The result of this formula would be an immense loss of jewish power in the West. The response from jewish slave armies was to call this formula "fascism". And yet, we see that there is mandatory service in "Israel". The distinction is that this service is not required for enfranchisement, and the collective's interests endure regardless of any such service, so Heinlein's formula is not actually in place in "Israel". But could it be in the West?
murder rank	Tue Jan 20 02:40:52 So apparently Jesus was a devil worshiper.
Cherub Cow rank	Tue Jan 20 03:47:10 [murfag]: "So apparently Jesus was a devil worshiper." Literally the opposite. jews worship Memnoch the Devil, since they followed the child-sacrificing gods and merely stole the idea of a one God when they saw further powers of inversion and destruction. jews were "Chosen" by Satan, since no people is chosen by any other. Christ, meanwhile, was disgusted by the plans of the jew, flipped their tables, and built up a coalition of followers who would oppose the jew and his devil worship. For this the jew executed Christ for betraying them and for betraying their Satan. ....... Tucker Carlson had on Peter Brimelow today, and they spoke about jewish ethnonationalism and the jewish plan to reduce the amount of White people in these United States: [January 19th, 2026] http://x.com/TuckerCarlson/status/2013333159249686706?t=1287 They mention two things which I've discussed in UP previously: 1) It is largely the left-wing Zionist jews who are the most ethno-nationalist [and psychopathic] 2) jews seem to think that eroding White people in their own lands will result in *less* "anti-Semitic" behavior 1) Of the first point, we see this in particular in the jewish leftist atheist Sam Harris, who flippantly reverses all of his arguments the moment it can mean jewish advantage. There is zero sense of symmetry involved, so you can expect these types will become unhinged and deranged when their arguments implicate themselves. This inability to understand the implication of one's own arguments upon the self is from the jewish stereotype of the vampire, which accurately models that the jew cannot see or comprehend his own reflection. Bram Stoker's "Dracula" (1897) was, of course, about the jew (and we can see a theme here with the 1850s to 1900 where much of literature was recognizing this same issue of the jew's infiltration). Thus, in Dracula are themes of the jew bringing plague rats, infection, famine, mass death, parasitism, and enslavement, often on the wings of their gypsy roots (thieves, fraudsters, deceivers, occultists). Even the idea of the jew drinking blood is from their practice of "Metzitzah B'Peh", where they orally suction blood from the penis of the circumcised child. This practice has been known in rabbinical communities to result in sexually transmitted diseases between rabbis and from rabbis to young children, particularly the transmission of herpes. The vampire thus similarly sucks blood and makes his victims sick in the literal sense as well as in the sense of the social parasite making the worker ill from work that no longer sustains his life, sent away as all wealth is to the jewish creditors. Many have examined this concept of the mirror indirectly to comprehend why the jew lacks this self-awareness. Lacan's "mirror stage", for instance, is not particularly convincing when taken as a psychological metaphor, but when understood as an indirect way to comprehend the jew's evasion of his reflection, it makes far more sense, particularly in relation to the vampire. The vampire, for instance, is an ugly, deformed, dysgenic being that seems vaguely human but is not quite of the right time or of the actual people of a society (vampire as the jewish infiltrator). His fashions seem like they are from a robbed corpse, with them missing the evidence that the vampire understands the living moment. For Lacan, this is a loss of subjectivity. The vampire, as the jew, cannot comprehend (or see himself in) the mirror because he lacks the ability to see beyond his narcissism. The vampire fancies himself superior for his powers, yet, being disfigured and horrifying, cannot face his reality as an object of himself when he looks in the mirror. Instead of seeing a tremendous beauty worthy of the respect that he believes he must have as a "Chosen" being, the jew sees instead a ghastly creature that none could love and none would follow. As vampire, the jew instead uses deception and devil's bargains for power, gaining sexual access to young victims who themselves are not allowed to see the image of the vampire without great terror. In other words, how can the jew believe both that he is "Chosen" (which requires that one be worthy of commanding the world) *and* look himself in the mirror and see his horrifying reflection? The jew accomplishes this by avoiding Lacan's mirror stage: he denies that he is an object in the world, denies the reality of himself, and instead insists that he is "the" subject of the world. We see, of course, how this so often backfires for the jew. How could a people that no one wants to see ever stand in the open and lead the world? It is a contradiction which jews often resolve by managing puppets from the shadows. They try to sell their ideology behind the attractive and noble people of their host population, and, if they believe that their ideology has sold, they unmask and take credit, similar to the story of "Cyrano de Bergerac". The problem is that the ideology often sells because people believe that it results in the attractive and noble person, whereas, if an ideology creates the face of the vampire, then people can more readily comprehend its many deformities. Their slave morality is, therefore, more accepted among these deformed peoples, just as Dracula's most loyal ally is the deranged inmate of an asylum. 2) Of the second point, jews often believe too readily in what the jew Steven Spielberg *critiques* in his movie "Minority Report" (2002). The jewish concept explored in this movie is a familiar "Israeli" policy: that even *potential* enemies of the jew must be proactively annihilated before they can even make the decision to harm the jew. It is this kind of psychopathic behavior which *creates* its own enemies, since if a people who are ambivalent, apathetic, or even tolerant towards the jew finds that they are suddenly being annihilated by the jew via policies of subversion, then the jew will have provoked the very response that they feared would exist — a response that would not have existed were the jew to have taken no such action at all. Thus, Carlson points out this obvious contradiction wherein the jew will provoke his own "oppressors" into their very existence. We might rephrase this to say that in an effort to "reduce" "anti-Semitism", the jew will import people who *actively* hate the jew (e.g., Muslims displaced by jewish wars) believing that this will disempower the White people who *might* *someday* dislike the jew, and the result is that anti-jewish Muslims will attack jews, and White people will have been disempowered by the jew and will be left unable to protect the jew from the jew's own anti-White golem. This seeming contradiction is again reconciled between the "seen" and "unseen" forces of the marketplace of the jew. There is a simple graphic which illustrates this point, but left-wing jews in a target nation invite foreign golems, and whenever these golems attack jews, this gives pretext for the erosion of the rights of the original citizens of the target nation. Simultaneously, jews can use domestic sentiments against their golems to justify foreign wars. So, if an Afghan attacks a synagogue in Detroit, then jews in control of the executive can encourage the bombing of Kabul. We saw this same deception after 9/11, where instead of there being a ban on all Saudi immigrants... we invaded Iraq. It is a total non sequitur, but when we see that the jew is merely redirecting angst for his favor, the strategy is very transparent. In the case of jews creating their own enemies, this too must be understood as not just behavioral reaction but a dysgenic strategy. The jew is not completely unaware that whipping a dog could cause the dog to bite; their intent is to breed a dog which can be beat endlessly and never bite.
	show deleted posts

Your Name:
Your Password:
Your Message: